Do low-paid workers benefit from the urban escalator? Evidence from British cities

Sanne Velthuis, Paul Sissons, Nigel Berkeley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cities are characterised as places of increased human capital accumulation, dynamic labour markets and faster wage growth: in short, places where workers can get ahead. Studies suggest that urban workers can benefit from faster learning and from better job matching. This article assesses the extent to which cities act as escalators for workers in low-wage jobs using panel data from Great Britain covering the period 2009–2014. When defining low pay using a standard national wage threshold, workers in London, the largest city, are significantly more likely to make a transition from low- to higher-paid employment than workers in non-urban areas. However, the use of a national wage threshold to measure progression from low pay is sensitive to geographic variations in wage levels. When using an alternative, occupation-based definition of low pay there is little to no evidence of faster wage growth in London or other large British cities, suggesting that low-paid workers do not benefit significantly from faster learning or more efficient job matching in cities. The findings, once adjusted for differences in the wage distribution, fail to identify an urban escalator effect for those in low-paid employment, suggesting that there is a fairly consistent set of underlying factors shaping progression from low pay across geographies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1664-1680
Number of pages17
JournalUrban Studies
Volume56
Issue number8
Early online date28 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

wage
worker
evidence
wage level
learning
capital accumulation
low wage
large city
panel data
human capital
geographical variation
city
labor market
occupation
geography

Keywords

  • Low Pay
  • Progression
  • Local labour markets
  • Cities
  • Wage growth
  • cities
  • low pay
  • wage growth
  • progression
  • agglomeration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Do low-paid workers benefit from the urban escalator? Evidence from British cities. / Velthuis, Sanne; Sissons, Paul; Berkeley, Nigel.

In: Urban Studies, Vol. 56, No. 8, 06.2019, p. 1664-1680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9ac2f930619a43f3b5a02f4820555b09,
title = "Do low-paid workers benefit from the urban escalator? Evidence from British cities",
abstract = "Cities are characterised as places of increased human capital accumulation, dynamic labour markets and faster wage growth: in short, places where workers can get ahead. Studies suggest that urban workers can benefit from faster learning and from better job matching. This article assesses the extent to which cities act as escalators for workers in low-wage jobs using panel data from Great Britain covering the period 2009–2014. When defining low pay using a standard national wage threshold, workers in London, the largest city, are significantly more likely to make a transition from low- to higher-paid employment than workers in non-urban areas. However, the use of a national wage threshold to measure progression from low pay is sensitive to geographic variations in wage levels. When using an alternative, occupation-based definition of low pay there is little to no evidence of faster wage growth in London or other large British cities, suggesting that low-paid workers do not benefit significantly from faster learning or more efficient job matching in cities. The findings, once adjusted for differences in the wage distribution, fail to identify an urban escalator effect for those in low-paid employment, suggesting that there is a fairly consistent set of underlying factors shaping progression from low pay across geographies.",
keywords = "Low Pay, Progression, Local labour markets, Cities, Wage growth, cities, low pay, wage growth, progression, agglomeration",
author = "Sanne Velthuis and Paul Sissons and Nigel Berkeley",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0042098018773657",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1664--1680",
journal = "Urban Studies",
issn = "0042-0980",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do low-paid workers benefit from the urban escalator? Evidence from British cities

AU - Velthuis, Sanne

AU - Sissons, Paul

AU - Berkeley, Nigel

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Cities are characterised as places of increased human capital accumulation, dynamic labour markets and faster wage growth: in short, places where workers can get ahead. Studies suggest that urban workers can benefit from faster learning and from better job matching. This article assesses the extent to which cities act as escalators for workers in low-wage jobs using panel data from Great Britain covering the period 2009–2014. When defining low pay using a standard national wage threshold, workers in London, the largest city, are significantly more likely to make a transition from low- to higher-paid employment than workers in non-urban areas. However, the use of a national wage threshold to measure progression from low pay is sensitive to geographic variations in wage levels. When using an alternative, occupation-based definition of low pay there is little to no evidence of faster wage growth in London or other large British cities, suggesting that low-paid workers do not benefit significantly from faster learning or more efficient job matching in cities. The findings, once adjusted for differences in the wage distribution, fail to identify an urban escalator effect for those in low-paid employment, suggesting that there is a fairly consistent set of underlying factors shaping progression from low pay across geographies.

AB - Cities are characterised as places of increased human capital accumulation, dynamic labour markets and faster wage growth: in short, places where workers can get ahead. Studies suggest that urban workers can benefit from faster learning and from better job matching. This article assesses the extent to which cities act as escalators for workers in low-wage jobs using panel data from Great Britain covering the period 2009–2014. When defining low pay using a standard national wage threshold, workers in London, the largest city, are significantly more likely to make a transition from low- to higher-paid employment than workers in non-urban areas. However, the use of a national wage threshold to measure progression from low pay is sensitive to geographic variations in wage levels. When using an alternative, occupation-based definition of low pay there is little to no evidence of faster wage growth in London or other large British cities, suggesting that low-paid workers do not benefit significantly from faster learning or more efficient job matching in cities. The findings, once adjusted for differences in the wage distribution, fail to identify an urban escalator effect for those in low-paid employment, suggesting that there is a fairly consistent set of underlying factors shaping progression from low pay across geographies.

KW - Low Pay

KW - Progression

KW - Local labour markets

KW - Cities

KW - Wage growth

KW - cities

KW - low pay

KW - wage growth

KW - progression

KW - agglomeration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049824440&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0042098018773657

DO - 10.1177/0042098018773657

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1664

EP - 1680

JO - Urban Studies

JF - Urban Studies

SN - 0042-0980

IS - 8

ER -