Do culture, sentiment, and cognitive dissonance explain the ‘above suspicion’ anomalies?

Ali Altanlar, Jiaqi Guo, Phil Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate how cognitive dissonance arising from interactions between sentiment and culture affects momentum and post-earnings-announcement-drift (PEAD). We focus on differing views relating to change between western and East Asian cultures. Building on Hong and Stein's heterogeneous trader model and recognizing westerners’ (easterners’) belief in continuation (reversal), we propose cognitive dissonance arises in different circumstances and to differing degrees in the two cultures, resulting in it being a key driver of the anomalies. Results support our hypotheses, suggesting sentiment and culture interact to impact cognitive dissonance, explaining differences in the anomalies across countries evident in prior literature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1168-1195
Number of pages28
JournalEuropean Financial Management
Volume25
Issue number5
Early online date10 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords

  • cognitive dissonance
  • culture
  • investor sentiment
  • momentum
  • post-earnings-announcement-drift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do culture, sentiment, and cognitive dissonance explain the ‘above suspicion’ anomalies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this