Disorganised host community touristic-event spaces: Revealing Rio’s fault lines at the 2016 Olympic Games

Mike Duignan, David McGillivray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We investigate the live staging spatial-organisational requirements of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, exploring the extent to which the project sequestrated, territorialised and commodified public space. Relatedly, we examine the role of new legal, regulatory and securitised event conditions in affording an effective and efficient ‘Olympic takeover’. We do this by drawing on i) official Rio 2016 planning documents, ii) observations of the live Olympic-city spatial effects, and iii) interviews with key informants. Findings reveal that Rio’s specially created Olympic event zones sought to transform visitor flows and circulations across the city, appropriating and regulating public space in-line with a desired tourist aesthetic. Rio’s public civic space became reimagined and controlled for commercial exploitation by Olympic sponsors, supporters and suppliers– facilitated by the creation of areas of exclusivity. And yet, we also reveal how the Rio Olympic city simultaneously emerged disorganised, open and fluid in places– a(temporary) break in the (neoliberal) economic logic we have come to expect. We argue that localised conditions affecting Rio afforded closer connectivity between event visitor economies and host communities. While these gains remain marginal and largely symbolic, they demonstrate that with effective planning, the Olympic host city need not only serve corporate interests.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)692-711
Number of pages20
JournalLeisure Studies
Volume38
Issue number5
Early online date27 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Olympic Games
public space
event
planning
staging
supplier
exploitation
tourist
aesthetics
economy
interview
economics
Faultlines
Olympics
esthetics
connectivity
transform
fluid
city

Keywords

  • Mega sport events
  • Urban space
  • spatial territorialisation
  • commercial exploitation
  • Rio 2016 Olympic Games
  • exceptional legislation
  • visitor economy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Disorganised host community touristic-event spaces: Revealing Rio’s fault lines at the 2016 Olympic Games. / Duignan, Mike; McGillivray, David.

In: Leisure Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2019, p. 692-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c0d8fa0fd19847c3aaa481dec3bc6fd5,
title = "Disorganised host community touristic-event spaces: Revealing Rio’s fault lines at the 2016 Olympic Games",
abstract = "We investigate the live staging spatial-organisational requirements of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, exploring the extent to which the project sequestrated, territorialised and commodified public space. Relatedly, we examine the role of new legal, regulatory and securitised event conditions in affording an effective and efficient ‘Olympic takeover’. We do this by drawing on i) official Rio 2016 planning documents, ii) observations of the live Olympic-city spatial effects, and iii) interviews with key informants. Findings reveal that Rio’s specially created Olympic event zones sought to transform visitor flows and circulations across the city, appropriating and regulating public space in-line with a desired tourist aesthetic. Rio’s public civic space became reimagined and controlled for commercial exploitation by Olympic sponsors, supporters and suppliers– facilitated by the creation of areas of exclusivity. And yet, we also reveal how the Rio Olympic city simultaneously emerged disorganised, open and fluid in places– a(temporary) break in the (neoliberal) economic logic we have come to expect. We argue that localised conditions affecting Rio afforded closer connectivity between event visitor economies and host communities. While these gains remain marginal and largely symbolic, they demonstrate that with effective planning, the Olympic host city need not only serve corporate interests.",
keywords = "Mega sport events, Urban space, spatial territorialisation, commercial exploitation, Rio 2016 Olympic Games, exceptional legislation, visitor economy",
author = "Mike Duignan and David McGillivray",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/02614367.2019.1633679",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "692--711",
journal = "Leisure Studies",
issn = "0261-4367",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disorganised host community touristic-event spaces: Revealing Rio’s fault lines at the 2016 Olympic Games

AU - Duignan, Mike

AU - McGillivray, David

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - We investigate the live staging spatial-organisational requirements of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, exploring the extent to which the project sequestrated, territorialised and commodified public space. Relatedly, we examine the role of new legal, regulatory and securitised event conditions in affording an effective and efficient ‘Olympic takeover’. We do this by drawing on i) official Rio 2016 planning documents, ii) observations of the live Olympic-city spatial effects, and iii) interviews with key informants. Findings reveal that Rio’s specially created Olympic event zones sought to transform visitor flows and circulations across the city, appropriating and regulating public space in-line with a desired tourist aesthetic. Rio’s public civic space became reimagined and controlled for commercial exploitation by Olympic sponsors, supporters and suppliers– facilitated by the creation of areas of exclusivity. And yet, we also reveal how the Rio Olympic city simultaneously emerged disorganised, open and fluid in places– a(temporary) break in the (neoliberal) economic logic we have come to expect. We argue that localised conditions affecting Rio afforded closer connectivity between event visitor economies and host communities. While these gains remain marginal and largely symbolic, they demonstrate that with effective planning, the Olympic host city need not only serve corporate interests.

AB - We investigate the live staging spatial-organisational requirements of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games, exploring the extent to which the project sequestrated, territorialised and commodified public space. Relatedly, we examine the role of new legal, regulatory and securitised event conditions in affording an effective and efficient ‘Olympic takeover’. We do this by drawing on i) official Rio 2016 planning documents, ii) observations of the live Olympic-city spatial effects, and iii) interviews with key informants. Findings reveal that Rio’s specially created Olympic event zones sought to transform visitor flows and circulations across the city, appropriating and regulating public space in-line with a desired tourist aesthetic. Rio’s public civic space became reimagined and controlled for commercial exploitation by Olympic sponsors, supporters and suppliers– facilitated by the creation of areas of exclusivity. And yet, we also reveal how the Rio Olympic city simultaneously emerged disorganised, open and fluid in places– a(temporary) break in the (neoliberal) economic logic we have come to expect. We argue that localised conditions affecting Rio afforded closer connectivity between event visitor economies and host communities. While these gains remain marginal and largely symbolic, they demonstrate that with effective planning, the Olympic host city need not only serve corporate interests.

KW - Mega sport events

KW - Urban space

KW - spatial territorialisation

KW - commercial exploitation

KW - Rio 2016 Olympic Games

KW - exceptional legislation

KW - visitor economy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068218649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02614367.2019.1633679

DO - 10.1080/02614367.2019.1633679

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 692

EP - 711

JO - Leisure Studies

JF - Leisure Studies

SN - 0261-4367

IS - 5

ER -