(Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making

Alex Franklin, T. Marsden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Why, despite a recent surge in the UK in “sustainable communities” policy discourse, do so many community-led sustainability initiatives remain fragmented, marginal and disconnected from local government strategies? How can community- and government-led sustainability initiatives be better integrated such that they add significantly to a denser matrix and cluster of sustainable places? These questions, we argue, lie at the heart of current sustainable place-making debates. With particular reference to two spatial scales of analysis and action, the small town of Stroud, England and the city of Cardiff, Wales, we explore the twin processes of disconnection and connection between community sustainability activists and local state actors. We conclude that whilst there will always remain a need for community groups to protect the freedom which comes from acting independently, for community activists and policy-makers alike, there are nevertheless a series of mutual benefits to be had from co-production. However, in setting out these benefits we also emphasise the dual need for local government to play a much more nuanced, integrative and facilitatory role, in addition to, but separate from, its more traditional regulatory role.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)940-956
JournalLocal Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability
Volume20
Issue number8
Early online date24 Jan 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

sustainability
local government
community
small town
coproduction
matrix
need
policy
discourse
Group
freedom
city
analysis

Keywords

  • sustainable communities
  • connected communities
  • local government
  • sustainability
  • intermediaries

Cite this

(Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making. / Franklin, Alex; Marsden, T.

In: Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, Vol. 20, No. 8, 24.01.2015, p. 940-956.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{639572d0078b4c9599d684a6272493c7,
title = "(Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making",
abstract = "Why, despite a recent surge in the UK in “sustainable communities” policy discourse, do so many community-led sustainability initiatives remain fragmented, marginal and disconnected from local government strategies? How can community- and government-led sustainability initiatives be better integrated such that they add significantly to a denser matrix and cluster of sustainable places? These questions, we argue, lie at the heart of current sustainable place-making debates. With particular reference to two spatial scales of analysis and action, the small town of Stroud, England and the city of Cardiff, Wales, we explore the twin processes of disconnection and connection between community sustainability activists and local state actors. We conclude that whilst there will always remain a need for community groups to protect the freedom which comes from acting independently, for community activists and policy-makers alike, there are nevertheless a series of mutual benefits to be had from co-production. However, in setting out these benefits we also emphasise the dual need for local government to play a much more nuanced, integrative and facilitatory role, in addition to, but separate from, its more traditional regulatory role.",
keywords = "sustainable communities, connected communities, local government, sustainability, intermediaries",
author = "Alex Franklin and T. Marsden",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/13549839.2013.879852",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "940--956",
journal = "Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability",
issn = "1354-9839",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making

AU - Franklin, Alex

AU - Marsden, T.

PY - 2015/1/24

Y1 - 2015/1/24

N2 - Why, despite a recent surge in the UK in “sustainable communities” policy discourse, do so many community-led sustainability initiatives remain fragmented, marginal and disconnected from local government strategies? How can community- and government-led sustainability initiatives be better integrated such that they add significantly to a denser matrix and cluster of sustainable places? These questions, we argue, lie at the heart of current sustainable place-making debates. With particular reference to two spatial scales of analysis and action, the small town of Stroud, England and the city of Cardiff, Wales, we explore the twin processes of disconnection and connection between community sustainability activists and local state actors. We conclude that whilst there will always remain a need for community groups to protect the freedom which comes from acting independently, for community activists and policy-makers alike, there are nevertheless a series of mutual benefits to be had from co-production. However, in setting out these benefits we also emphasise the dual need for local government to play a much more nuanced, integrative and facilitatory role, in addition to, but separate from, its more traditional regulatory role.

AB - Why, despite a recent surge in the UK in “sustainable communities” policy discourse, do so many community-led sustainability initiatives remain fragmented, marginal and disconnected from local government strategies? How can community- and government-led sustainability initiatives be better integrated such that they add significantly to a denser matrix and cluster of sustainable places? These questions, we argue, lie at the heart of current sustainable place-making debates. With particular reference to two spatial scales of analysis and action, the small town of Stroud, England and the city of Cardiff, Wales, we explore the twin processes of disconnection and connection between community sustainability activists and local state actors. We conclude that whilst there will always remain a need for community groups to protect the freedom which comes from acting independently, for community activists and policy-makers alike, there are nevertheless a series of mutual benefits to be had from co-production. However, in setting out these benefits we also emphasise the dual need for local government to play a much more nuanced, integrative and facilitatory role, in addition to, but separate from, its more traditional regulatory role.

KW - sustainable communities

KW - connected communities

KW - local government

KW - sustainability

KW - intermediaries

U2 - 10.1080/13549839.2013.879852

DO - 10.1080/13549839.2013.879852

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 940

EP - 956

JO - Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability

JF - Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability

SN - 1354-9839

IS - 8

ER -