(Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making

Alex Franklin, T. Marsden

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    39 Citations (Scopus)
    183 Downloads (Pure)


    Why, despite a recent surge in the UK in “sustainable communities” policy discourse, do so many community-led sustainability initiatives remain fragmented, marginal and disconnected from local government strategies? How can community- and government-led sustainability initiatives be better integrated such that they add significantly to a denser matrix and cluster of sustainable places? These questions, we argue, lie at the heart of current sustainable place-making debates. With particular reference to two spatial scales of analysis and action, the small town of Stroud, England and the city of Cardiff, Wales, we explore the twin processes of disconnection and connection between community sustainability activists and local state actors. We conclude that whilst there will always remain a need for community groups to protect the freedom which comes from acting independently, for community activists and policy-makers alike, there are nevertheless a series of mutual benefits to be had from co-production. However, in setting out these benefits we also emphasise the dual need for local government to play a much more nuanced, integrative and facilitatory role, in addition to, but separate from, its more traditional regulatory role.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)940-956
    JournalLocal Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability
    Issue number8
    Early online date24 Jan 2014
    Publication statusPublished - 2015


    • sustainable communities
    • connected communities
    • local government
    • sustainability
    • intermediaries


    Dive into the research topics of '(Dis)connected communities and sustainable place-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this