Disclosure of medical errors in Oman: Public preferences and perceptions of current practice

M.I.K. Norrish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)


Objectives: This study aimed to provide insight into the preferences for and perceptions of medical error disclosure (MED) by members of the public in Oman. Methods: Between January and June 2012, an online survey was used to collect responses from 205 members of the public across five governorates of Oman. Results: A disclosure gap was revealed between the respondents’ preferences for MED and perceived current MED practices in Oman. This disclosure gap extended to both the type of error and the person most likely to disclose the error. Errors resulting in patient harm were found to have a strong influence on individuals’ perceived quality of care. In addition, full disclosure was found to be highly valued by respondents and able to mitigate for a perceived lack of care in cases where medical errors led to damages. Conclusion: The perceived disclosure gap between respondents’ MED preferences and perceptions of current MED practices in Oman needs to be addressed in order to increase public confidence in the national health care system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e283-e287
JournalSultan Qaboos University Medical Journal : SQUMJ
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

This article is published in an open access publication and is free to view and download at: http://web.squ.edu.om/squmj/index.asp


Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure of medical errors in Oman: Public preferences and perceptions of current practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this