Disabled Dance: Grounding the Practice in the Law of Cultural Heritage

Shawn Harmon, Charlotte Waelde, Sarah Whatley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The arts, including dance, hold great importance in society. The InVisible Difference project seeks to extend thinking and alter practice around the making, status, ownership, and value of work by contemporary dance choreographers, focusing on that made and performed by differently-abled individuals. This paper considers the position of disabled dance in law and society by asking the overarching question: Is disabled dance a part of our 'cultural heritage'? This is an important question because it will, or ought to, have both legal and social consequences for this art-form moving forward. First, we examine the legal definition of 'cultural heritage' as it has developed in international human rights law and practice. Second, we consider whether disabled dance does or could fit into that definition and therefore claim the protections and potential benefits of that capture. Finally, we consider what might be done under the directive legal instruments that bear on this setting, focusing on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Current Legal Issues
Volume20
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

dance
cultural heritage
Law
art
social effects
human rights
disability
human being
Values
Society

Keywords

  • law
  • international law
  • human rights
  • cultural heritage
  • culture
  • dance
  • marginalisation

Cite this

Disabled Dance: Grounding the Practice in the Law of Cultural Heritage. / Harmon, Shawn; Waelde, Charlotte; Whatley, Sarah.

In: European Journal of Current Legal Issues, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{203272a67f8a4f2eb359b5a20b25209e,
title = "Disabled Dance: Grounding the Practice in the Law of Cultural Heritage",
abstract = "The arts, including dance, hold great importance in society. The InVisible Difference project seeks to extend thinking and alter practice around the making, status, ownership, and value of work by contemporary dance choreographers, focusing on that made and performed by differently-abled individuals. This paper considers the position of disabled dance in law and society by asking the overarching question: Is disabled dance a part of our 'cultural heritage'? This is an important question because it will, or ought to, have both legal and social consequences for this art-form moving forward. First, we examine the legal definition of 'cultural heritage' as it has developed in international human rights law and practice. Second, we consider whether disabled dance does or could fit into that definition and therefore claim the protections and potential benefits of that capture. Finally, we consider what might be done under the directive legal instruments that bear on this setting, focusing on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)",
keywords = "law, international law, human rights, cultural heritage, culture, dance, marginalisation",
author = "Shawn Harmon and Charlotte Waelde and Sarah Whatley",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "European Journal of Current Legal Issues",
issn = "2059-0881",
publisher = "Open Journal Systems",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disabled Dance: Grounding the Practice in the Law of Cultural Heritage

AU - Harmon, Shawn

AU - Waelde, Charlotte

AU - Whatley, Sarah

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The arts, including dance, hold great importance in society. The InVisible Difference project seeks to extend thinking and alter practice around the making, status, ownership, and value of work by contemporary dance choreographers, focusing on that made and performed by differently-abled individuals. This paper considers the position of disabled dance in law and society by asking the overarching question: Is disabled dance a part of our 'cultural heritage'? This is an important question because it will, or ought to, have both legal and social consequences for this art-form moving forward. First, we examine the legal definition of 'cultural heritage' as it has developed in international human rights law and practice. Second, we consider whether disabled dance does or could fit into that definition and therefore claim the protections and potential benefits of that capture. Finally, we consider what might be done under the directive legal instruments that bear on this setting, focusing on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)

AB - The arts, including dance, hold great importance in society. The InVisible Difference project seeks to extend thinking and alter practice around the making, status, ownership, and value of work by contemporary dance choreographers, focusing on that made and performed by differently-abled individuals. This paper considers the position of disabled dance in law and society by asking the overarching question: Is disabled dance a part of our 'cultural heritage'? This is an important question because it will, or ought to, have both legal and social consequences for this art-form moving forward. First, we examine the legal definition of 'cultural heritage' as it has developed in international human rights law and practice. Second, we consider whether disabled dance does or could fit into that definition and therefore claim the protections and potential benefits of that capture. Finally, we consider what might be done under the directive legal instruments that bear on this setting, focusing on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)

KW - law

KW - international law

KW - human rights

KW - cultural heritage

KW - culture

KW - dance

KW - marginalisation

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - European Journal of Current Legal Issues

JF - European Journal of Current Legal Issues

SN - 2059-0881

IS - 3

ER -