Research output per year
Research output per year
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | CD005627 |
| Journal | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews |
| Volume | 2013 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Jul 2013 |
Supported by the Medical Research Coun cil (Ref GO701771) and NHS Research Scotland (NRS) through NHS Tayside. No mention of any research pro tocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Randomisation using a random-number table. Allocation using sealed, opaque envelopes (information not published) Supported by a grant (HD 24112) from the National Institutes of Health. Study guided by a research protocol and previous validation studies. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Supported by a grant (R18-DK067334) from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and a grant from the Kaiser Garfield Foundation. No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were slightly different between groups at baseline Supported by a grant from the Nation- alScienceCouncil,Taiwan (NSC 93-2314- B-182-079). No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Some outcomes of relevance were not de scribed (e.g. weight loss) Supported by a Research Incentive Grant awarded by Boston College. No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Supported by the NIH, NICHD, R01, D39102 grant to DK. To guide interven tion development, 8 focus groups (n = 38 women) of women, who were WIC participants but not eligible for the study, were held prior to the intervention. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline for the entire population (n = 151). However, participants and drop outs were slightly different Supported by a Pilot Feasibility Grant from the Obesity Nutrition Research Center (DK46204). No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The intervention group was significantly older and had a greater percentage of married women, compared to control group Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HD 34222) and the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service. No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Randomised controlled trial. The randomisation was stratified by parity because loss of bone density during lactation may be different between primiparous and multiparous women 20 healthy (free from chronic disease), non-smoking, sedentary, exclusively breastfeeding women with a BMI of 25-30 kg/m2 at 3 weeks postpartum. Supported by a grant from the North Car olina Agricultural Research Service. No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Supported by NIH grant (HD 24112). No mention of any research protocol published a priori. But the study seems to be guided by a previous short-term intervention study in lactating women. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline Study supported by the American Heart Association Heartland Affiliate, award 0051330Z. No mention of any research protocol published a priori. The characteristics of participants were not significantly different between groups at baseline
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review