Diesel engine emissions with oxygenated fuels: A comparative study into cold-start and hot-start operation

A. Zare, M.N. Nabi, T.A. Bodisco, F.M. Hossain, M.M. Rahman, T. Chu Van, Z.D. Ristovski, R.J. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As biofuels are increasingly represented in the fuel market, the use of these oxygenated fuels should be evaluated under various engine operating conditions, such as cold-start. However, to-date quantification has been mostly done under hot-start engine operation. By using a custom test designed for this study, a comparative investigation was performed on exhaust emissions during cold- and hot-start with diesel and three oxygenated fuels based on waste cooking biodiesel and triacetin. This study used a six-cylinder, turbocharged, after-cooled diesel engine with a common rail injection system. The results during cold-start with diesel showed lower NOx (up to 15.4%), PN (up to 48%), PM 1 (up to 44%) and PM 2.5 (up to 63%). However, the oxygenated fuels during cold-start showed a significant increase in NOx (up to 94%), PN (up to 27 times), PM 1 (up to 7.3 times) and PM 2.5 (up to 5 times) relative to hot-start. The use of oxygenated fuels instead of diesel during hot-start decreased the PN, PM 2.5 and PM 1 (up to 91%) while, during cold-start, it only decreased PM 1 and PM 2.5 at some engine operating modes and increased PN significantly up to 17 times. In both cold- and hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels resulted in an increase in NOx emission. For cold-start this was up to 125%, for hot-start it was up to 13.9%. In comparison with hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels during cold-start increased nucleation mode particles significantly, which are harmful. This should be taken into consideration, since cold-start operation is an inevitable part of the daily driving schedule for a significantly high portion of vehicles, especially in cities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)997-1008
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
Volume162
Early online date13 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Sep 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

diesel engine
Diesel engines
comparative study
diesel
Engines
engine
Cooking
Biofuels
Engine cylinders
Biodiesel
cold
Diesel engine
Comparative study
exhaust emission
Rails
Nucleation
biofuel
nucleation
market

Keywords

  • Cold-start
  • Biodiesel
  • Fuel oxygen content
  • PM
  • PN
  • Particle size distribution

Cite this

Diesel engine emissions with oxygenated fuels : A comparative study into cold-start and hot-start operation. / Zare, A.; Nabi, M.N.; Bodisco, T.A.; Hossain, F.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Chu Van, T.; Ristovski, Z.D.; Brown, R.J.

In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 162, 20.09.2017, p. 997-1008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zare, A. ; Nabi, M.N. ; Bodisco, T.A. ; Hossain, F.M. ; Rahman, M.M. ; Chu Van, T. ; Ristovski, Z.D. ; Brown, R.J. / Diesel engine emissions with oxygenated fuels : A comparative study into cold-start and hot-start operation. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017 ; Vol. 162. pp. 997-1008.
@article{c732e308d9ad4707bee1b00951ac0a2b,
title = "Diesel engine emissions with oxygenated fuels: A comparative study into cold-start and hot-start operation",
abstract = "As biofuels are increasingly represented in the fuel market, the use of these oxygenated fuels should be evaluated under various engine operating conditions, such as cold-start. However, to-date quantification has been mostly done under hot-start engine operation. By using a custom test designed for this study, a comparative investigation was performed on exhaust emissions during cold- and hot-start with diesel and three oxygenated fuels based on waste cooking biodiesel and triacetin. This study used a six-cylinder, turbocharged, after-cooled diesel engine with a common rail injection system. The results during cold-start with diesel showed lower NOx (up to 15.4{\%}), PN (up to 48{\%}), PM 1 (up to 44{\%}) and PM 2.5 (up to 63{\%}). However, the oxygenated fuels during cold-start showed a significant increase in NOx (up to 94{\%}), PN (up to 27 times), PM 1 (up to 7.3 times) and PM 2.5 (up to 5 times) relative to hot-start. The use of oxygenated fuels instead of diesel during hot-start decreased the PN, PM 2.5 and PM 1 (up to 91{\%}) while, during cold-start, it only decreased PM 1 and PM 2.5 at some engine operating modes and increased PN significantly up to 17 times. In both cold- and hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels resulted in an increase in NOx emission. For cold-start this was up to 125{\%}, for hot-start it was up to 13.9{\%}. In comparison with hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels during cold-start increased nucleation mode particles significantly, which are harmful. This should be taken into consideration, since cold-start operation is an inevitable part of the daily driving schedule for a significantly high portion of vehicles, especially in cities.",
keywords = "Cold-start, Biodiesel, Fuel oxygen content, PM, PN, Particle size distribution",
author = "A. Zare and M.N. Nabi and T.A. Bodisco and F.M. Hossain and M.M. Rahman and {Chu Van}, T. and Z.D. Ristovski and R.J. Brown",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.052",
language = "English",
volume = "162",
pages = "997--1008",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diesel engine emissions with oxygenated fuels

T2 - A comparative study into cold-start and hot-start operation

AU - Zare, A.

AU - Nabi, M.N.

AU - Bodisco, T.A.

AU - Hossain, F.M.

AU - Rahman, M.M.

AU - Chu Van, T.

AU - Ristovski, Z.D.

AU - Brown, R.J.

PY - 2017/9/20

Y1 - 2017/9/20

N2 - As biofuels are increasingly represented in the fuel market, the use of these oxygenated fuels should be evaluated under various engine operating conditions, such as cold-start. However, to-date quantification has been mostly done under hot-start engine operation. By using a custom test designed for this study, a comparative investigation was performed on exhaust emissions during cold- and hot-start with diesel and three oxygenated fuels based on waste cooking biodiesel and triacetin. This study used a six-cylinder, turbocharged, after-cooled diesel engine with a common rail injection system. The results during cold-start with diesel showed lower NOx (up to 15.4%), PN (up to 48%), PM 1 (up to 44%) and PM 2.5 (up to 63%). However, the oxygenated fuels during cold-start showed a significant increase in NOx (up to 94%), PN (up to 27 times), PM 1 (up to 7.3 times) and PM 2.5 (up to 5 times) relative to hot-start. The use of oxygenated fuels instead of diesel during hot-start decreased the PN, PM 2.5 and PM 1 (up to 91%) while, during cold-start, it only decreased PM 1 and PM 2.5 at some engine operating modes and increased PN significantly up to 17 times. In both cold- and hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels resulted in an increase in NOx emission. For cold-start this was up to 125%, for hot-start it was up to 13.9%. In comparison with hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels during cold-start increased nucleation mode particles significantly, which are harmful. This should be taken into consideration, since cold-start operation is an inevitable part of the daily driving schedule for a significantly high portion of vehicles, especially in cities.

AB - As biofuels are increasingly represented in the fuel market, the use of these oxygenated fuels should be evaluated under various engine operating conditions, such as cold-start. However, to-date quantification has been mostly done under hot-start engine operation. By using a custom test designed for this study, a comparative investigation was performed on exhaust emissions during cold- and hot-start with diesel and three oxygenated fuels based on waste cooking biodiesel and triacetin. This study used a six-cylinder, turbocharged, after-cooled diesel engine with a common rail injection system. The results during cold-start with diesel showed lower NOx (up to 15.4%), PN (up to 48%), PM 1 (up to 44%) and PM 2.5 (up to 63%). However, the oxygenated fuels during cold-start showed a significant increase in NOx (up to 94%), PN (up to 27 times), PM 1 (up to 7.3 times) and PM 2.5 (up to 5 times) relative to hot-start. The use of oxygenated fuels instead of diesel during hot-start decreased the PN, PM 2.5 and PM 1 (up to 91%) while, during cold-start, it only decreased PM 1 and PM 2.5 at some engine operating modes and increased PN significantly up to 17 times. In both cold- and hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels resulted in an increase in NOx emission. For cold-start this was up to 125%, for hot-start it was up to 13.9%. In comparison with hot-start, the use of oxygenated fuels during cold-start increased nucleation mode particles significantly, which are harmful. This should be taken into consideration, since cold-start operation is an inevitable part of the daily driving schedule for a significantly high portion of vehicles, especially in cities.

KW - Cold-start

KW - Biodiesel

KW - Fuel oxygen content

KW - PM

KW - PN

KW - Particle size distribution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85027861037&partnerID=MN8TOARS

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/diesel-engine-emissions-oxygenated-fuels-comparative-study-coldstart-hotstart-operation

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.052

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.052

M3 - Article

VL - 162

SP - 997

EP - 1008

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -