Abstract
This paper examines the possible effects of corporate governance (GC) on audit quality (AQ) among the FTSE 350 companies. Using a sample of 180 companies from 2012 to 2017 (i.e. 1080 firm-year observations) a binary logistic model has been employed to investigate the CG-AQ nexus. This analysis was supported by conducting a probit logistic model as a sensitivity analysis. Our findings are associative of a heterogeneous impact of CG on AQ post the implementation of the 2012 CG reforms in the UK. For example, although institutional ownership and management ownership can predict AQ, board independence, non-executive directors and audit committee are not attributed to AQ in the UK. This implies that corporate compliance with good CG practices has a limited impact on the decision to select a Big4 auditor in the UK. Despite the limitations of our study, we hope it can motivate further investigations in this area.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 51–60 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of Disclosure and Governance |
Volume | 17 |
Early online date | 4 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2020 |
Bibliographical note
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00074-1Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
Keywords
- Corporate governance
- Audit quality
- Auditor selection
- Audit quality Auditor selection FTSE 350
- UK
- FTSE 350
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Accounting
- Business and International Management
- Finance
- Strategy and Management