Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland

Charis Rice, Ian Somerville

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the implications of consociationalism for government communication in Northern Ireland. Our study used qualitative data, from 33 semi-structured interviews with key actors in the government communication process: Government Information Officers (GIOs), Ministerial Special Advisers (SpAds) and political journalists. We use contemporary Northern Ireland as a strategic case study to investigate how these unelected elite actors experience the consociational system in their professional roles and relationships, and to ascertain what impacts they perceive it to have on the government communication sphere. While the strengths and benefits of consociationalism as a form of political accommodation have been assessed through the lens of various disciplines, namely political science, we propose that a communication focus has much to offer the debate. We demonstrate that major limitations of the consociational model are evident if we focus on the communication sphere in the stable post-conflict phase.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationConsociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe
Subtitle of host publicationArend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation
EditorsMichaelina Jakala, Durukhan Kuzu, Matt Qvortrup
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages103-127
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-67098-0
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-67097-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

dialogue
democracy
communication
journalist
political science
accommodation
elite
interview
experience

Cite this

Rice, C., & Somerville, I. (2018). Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland. In M. Jakala, D. Kuzu, & M. Qvortrup (Eds.), Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe: Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation (pp. 103-127). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0_6

Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland. / Rice, Charis; Somerville, Ian.

Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe: Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation. ed. / Michaelina Jakala; Durukhan Kuzu; Matt Qvortrup. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. p. 103-127.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Rice, C & Somerville, I 2018, Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland. in M Jakala, D Kuzu & M Qvortrup (eds), Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe: Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 103-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0_6
Rice C, Somerville I. Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland. In Jakala M, Kuzu D, Qvortrup M, editors, Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe: Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation. Palgrave Macmillan. 2018. p. 103-127 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0_6
Rice, Charis ; Somerville, Ian. / Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland. Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe: Arend Lijphart’s Theory of Political Accommodation. editor / Michaelina Jakala ; Durukhan Kuzu ; Matt Qvortrup. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. pp. 103-127
@inbook{4651a78cab8c4432929a407924597892,
title = "Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "This chapter explores the implications of consociationalism for government communication in Northern Ireland. Our study used qualitative data, from 33 semi-structured interviews with key actors in the government communication process: Government Information Officers (GIOs), Ministerial Special Advisers (SpAds) and political journalists. We use contemporary Northern Ireland as a strategic case study to investigate how these unelected elite actors experience the consociational system in their professional roles and relationships, and to ascertain what impacts they perceive it to have on the government communication sphere. While the strengths and benefits of consociationalism as a form of political accommodation have been assessed through the lens of various disciplines, namely political science, we propose that a communication focus has much to offer the debate. We demonstrate that major limitations of the consociational model are evident if we focus on the communication sphere in the stable post-conflict phase.",
author = "Charis Rice and Ian Somerville",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-67097-3",
pages = "103--127",
editor = "Jakala, {Michaelina } and Durukhan Kuzu and Matt Qvortrup",
booktitle = "Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Dialogue, Democracy and Government Communication: Consociationalism in Northern Ireland

AU - Rice, Charis

AU - Somerville, Ian

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This chapter explores the implications of consociationalism for government communication in Northern Ireland. Our study used qualitative data, from 33 semi-structured interviews with key actors in the government communication process: Government Information Officers (GIOs), Ministerial Special Advisers (SpAds) and political journalists. We use contemporary Northern Ireland as a strategic case study to investigate how these unelected elite actors experience the consociational system in their professional roles and relationships, and to ascertain what impacts they perceive it to have on the government communication sphere. While the strengths and benefits of consociationalism as a form of political accommodation have been assessed through the lens of various disciplines, namely political science, we propose that a communication focus has much to offer the debate. We demonstrate that major limitations of the consociational model are evident if we focus on the communication sphere in the stable post-conflict phase.

AB - This chapter explores the implications of consociationalism for government communication in Northern Ireland. Our study used qualitative data, from 33 semi-structured interviews with key actors in the government communication process: Government Information Officers (GIOs), Ministerial Special Advisers (SpAds) and political journalists. We use contemporary Northern Ireland as a strategic case study to investigate how these unelected elite actors experience the consociational system in their professional roles and relationships, and to ascertain what impacts they perceive it to have on the government communication sphere. While the strengths and benefits of consociationalism as a form of political accommodation have been assessed through the lens of various disciplines, namely political science, we propose that a communication focus has much to offer the debate. We demonstrate that major limitations of the consociational model are evident if we focus on the communication sphere in the stable post-conflict phase.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0_6

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-67098-0_6

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-67097-3

SP - 103

EP - 127

BT - Consociationalism and Power-Sharing in Europe

A2 - Jakala, Michaelina

A2 - Kuzu, Durukhan

A2 - Qvortrup, Matt

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -