Development of a Resource for Health Professionals to Raise Advance Care Planning Topics During Kidney Care Consultations: A Multiple User-Centered Design

Anna Winterbottom, Helen Hurst, Fliss E M Murtagh, Hilary L Bekker, Paula Ormandy, Barnaby Hole, Lynne Russon, Emma Murphy, Keith Bucknall, Andrew Mooney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Planning and delivering treatment pathways that integrate end-of-life care, frailty assessment, and enhanced supportive care is a service priority. Despite this, people with kidney failure are less likely to have an advance care plan and receive hospice and palliative care compared with other chronic illness populations. This is linked to health professionals feeling unskilled initiating conversations around future treatment and care options. This article describes research underpinning the development of a guide for kidney health professionals discussing end-of-life and advance care planning options with people with kidney failure and family members. 

Study Design: The study comprised 2 parts: an initial cross-sectional qualitative approach using in-depth interviews with older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers followed by resource development with input from multiple stakeholders. 

Setting & Participants: Older adults with kidney failure and (bereaved) carers recruited from 2 renal units in the North of England and by online advertisements with national United Kingdom-based kidney patient charities. Resource development included input from co-applicants, independent advisory committee, patient and public involvement team, multidisciplinary health professionals and academics in the United Kingdom and Denmark. 

Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. 

Results: Twenty-seven people were interviewed: older adults with kidney failure (n = 18), carers (n = 5), bereaved carers (n = 4). Five themes are described: the context within which end-of-life conversations take place, preferences for end-of-life treatment and care, family members’ role and needs in supporting people with kidney failure at the end-of-life, expectations and experience of dialysis treatment, and beliefs and experiences of death and dying. 

Limitations: Participants were mainly White, British, and receiving hemodialysis. 

Conclusions: People with (lived) experience of kidney failure informed a guide which aims to build on health professionals existing skills and improve confidence having conversations about future treatment and care. Kidney teams have expressed interest implementing the guide in practice and within their broader communications training packages.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100874
Number of pages10
JournalKidney Medicine
Volume6
Issue number9
Early online date18 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Funder

The project developing the “Difficult Conversations: Talking with People About Kidney Failure, End-of-Life and Advance Care Planning: A Guide for Health Professionals” was funded by Kidney Care UK and the British Renal Society (now UK Kidney Association; ref 19-001; 2021-2022).

Funding

The project developing the “Difficult Conversations: Talking with People About Kidney Failure, End-of-Life and Advance Care Planning: A Guide for Health Professionals” was funded by Kidney Care UK and the British Renal Society (now UK Kidney Association; ref 19-001; 2021-2022).

FundersFunder number
Kidney Care UK19-001; 2021-2022

    Keywords

    • Advance care planning
    • end-of-life care
    • health care professionals
    • kidney failure
    • palliative care

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a Resource for Health Professionals to Raise Advance Care Planning Topics During Kidney Care Consultations: A Multiple User-Centered Design'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this