Development and validation of the Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ)

Philipp Daniel Romeike, Manuel Fleschhut, Ann-Marie Nienaber, Gerhard Schewe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we present the multidimensional Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ), which is based on social-exchange and institutional theory. Our aim was to develop and validate a widely applicable leadership inventory that accounts for comparable criterion variance as transformational leadership. While transformational leadership scales emphasize charismatic or visionary behavior, the basis for the LMCQ is the belief that perceptions of control legitimacy are essential and lead to high-quality social-exchange relationships between supervisors and subordinates. To build the dimensions comprising the LMCQ, an exploratory study (study 1, 38 respondents) was conducted to investigate which kinds of socioemotional benefits actually drive subordinates' perceptions of control legitimacy. The interview data were used to compile an initial item pool that was condensed as a subsequent step (study 2, 494 respondents). Lastly, the resulting measurement instrument representing six dimensions of legitimacy-enhancing supervisory behavior was validated (study 3, 936 respondents).

Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003

© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-59
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Management Journal
Volume35
Issue number1
Early online date3 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Monitoring
Questionnaire
Legitimacy
Transformational leadership
Exchange relationships
Supervisors
Social exchange theory
Control mechanism
Exploratory study
Attribution
Editing
Institutional theory
Social exchange
Peer review
License
Quality control

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003

© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Social exchanges
  • Institutional theory
  • Trust
  • Commitment
  • Validation

Cite this

Development and validation of the Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ). / Romeike, Philipp Daniel; Fleschhut, Manuel; Nienaber, Ann-Marie; Schewe, Gerhard.

In: European Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 02.2017, p. 46-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Romeike, Philipp Daniel ; Fleschhut, Manuel ; Nienaber, Ann-Marie ; Schewe, Gerhard. / Development and validation of the Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ). In: European Management Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 35, No. 1. pp. 46-59.
@article{90d9bbe1b6584d58b110e556fdb138f2,
title = "Development and validation of the Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ)",
abstract = "In this paper, we present the multidimensional Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ), which is based on social-exchange and institutional theory. Our aim was to develop and validate a widely applicable leadership inventory that accounts for comparable criterion variance as transformational leadership. While transformational leadership scales emphasize charismatic or visionary behavior, the basis for the LMCQ is the belief that perceptions of control legitimacy are essential and lead to high-quality social-exchange relationships between supervisors and subordinates. To build the dimensions comprising the LMCQ, an exploratory study (study 1, 38 respondents) was conducted to investigate which kinds of socioemotional benefits actually drive subordinates' perceptions of control legitimacy. The interview data were used to compile an initial item pool that was condensed as a subsequent step (study 2, 494 respondents). Lastly, the resulting measurement instrument representing six dimensions of legitimacy-enhancing supervisory behavior was validated (study 3, 936 respondents).Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003{\circledC} 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
keywords = "Social exchanges, Institutional theory, Trust, Commitment, Validation",
author = "Romeike, {Philipp Daniel} and Manuel Fleschhut and Ann-Marie Nienaber and Gerhard Schewe",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003 {\circledC} 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "46--59",
journal = "European Management Journal",
issn = "0263-2373",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of the Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ)

AU - Romeike, Philipp Daniel

AU - Fleschhut, Manuel

AU - Nienaber, Ann-Marie

AU - Schewe, Gerhard

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003 © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2017/2

Y1 - 2017/2

N2 - In this paper, we present the multidimensional Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ), which is based on social-exchange and institutional theory. Our aim was to develop and validate a widely applicable leadership inventory that accounts for comparable criterion variance as transformational leadership. While transformational leadership scales emphasize charismatic or visionary behavior, the basis for the LMCQ is the belief that perceptions of control legitimacy are essential and lead to high-quality social-exchange relationships between supervisors and subordinates. To build the dimensions comprising the LMCQ, an exploratory study (study 1, 38 respondents) was conducted to investigate which kinds of socioemotional benefits actually drive subordinates' perceptions of control legitimacy. The interview data were used to compile an initial item pool that was condensed as a subsequent step (study 2, 494 respondents). Lastly, the resulting measurement instrument representing six dimensions of legitimacy-enhancing supervisory behavior was validated (study 3, 936 respondents).Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

AB - In this paper, we present the multidimensional Legitimate Monitoring and Control Questionnaire (LMCQ), which is based on social-exchange and institutional theory. Our aim was to develop and validate a widely applicable leadership inventory that accounts for comparable criterion variance as transformational leadership. While transformational leadership scales emphasize charismatic or visionary behavior, the basis for the LMCQ is the belief that perceptions of control legitimacy are essential and lead to high-quality social-exchange relationships between supervisors and subordinates. To build the dimensions comprising the LMCQ, an exploratory study (study 1, 38 respondents) was conducted to investigate which kinds of socioemotional benefits actually drive subordinates' perceptions of control legitimacy. The interview data were used to compile an initial item pool that was condensed as a subsequent step (study 2, 494 respondents). Lastly, the resulting measurement instrument representing six dimensions of legitimacy-enhancing supervisory behavior was validated (study 3, 936 respondents).Publisher Statement: NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in European Management Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in European Management Journal, [35, 1, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

KW - Social exchanges

KW - Institutional theory

KW - Trust

KW - Commitment

KW - Validation

U2 - 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 46

EP - 59

JO - European Management Journal

JF - European Management Journal

SN - 0263-2373

IS - 1

ER -