Developing healthcare leaders for the 21st century: understanding and maximising leadership in pre-registration healthcare curricula in the West Midlands, UK

L. Jones, L. Torney, S. Baxter, R. Dudley, D. Johnson, A. O'Brien, P. Owen, A. Taylor, A. Turner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: Effective and influential leadership within healthcare organisations is essential to ensure high standards and quality of care. To deliver this, healthcare providers and educators need to encourage leadership in professionals from the outset of their careers. Additionally, significant monies are spent on leadership development after initial qualification. Enhancement of leadership teaching and experience within the pre-registration curriculum could, therefore, lead to future cost savings as well as improved patient care. Collaboration between three UK Universities allowed an opportunity for perspectives to be gathered from six stakeholder groups relating to the curriculum, academic environment and clinical environment. Purpose: The project sought to enhance understanding of what a range of different stakeholders believed “excellent leadership” looked like, and explore how leadership was taught in pre-registration healthcare education, so enabling the development of best practice for preparing future healthcare leaders. Methods: Separate focus groups were held locally in the three University areas for each of the stakeholder groups: students; university lecturers; clinical and commissioning staff across nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, paramedic science and dietetic professions as well as service users and carers. Each focus group was facilitated by the same researcher and lasted approximately one hour. A semi-structured approach incorporating six questions was used. Audio-taped discussions were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was undertaken using content coding. This was validated by an approach of co-reading and agreement of themes within the research team. Results: Findings highlighted varying definitions of leadership and what participants perceived to be excellent or effective leadership. Participants commented on current methods of teaching leadership in undergraduate healthcare education, and how these methods could be enhanced. The value of multi-disciplinary learning, and good role-modelling in practice was identified as key to providing students with the essential leadership skills relevant to all healthcare professionals. Additionally, it was noted that leadership in healthcare education, although present, was not always recognised by as such by students, who did not necessarily appreciate leadership as a professional skill required by graduates. This was echoed by various participant groups including service users and carers, university educators and senior practice staff. Conclusion(s): The teaching of leadership should be “re-badged” and incorporated more overtly within all pre-registration health professional programmes. In addition, the relevance of leadership needs to be clarified and re-enforced within the academic as well as clinical setting. Good role modelling in practice is key to facilitating the development of early leadership skills. Implications: The results will inform the three participating universities and local healthcare providers on enhancing effective methods of incorporating leadership skills and qualities development in undergraduate curricula, and allow for sharing and communication of good practice, across the wider health economy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e691-e692
    JournalPhysiotherapy
    Volume101
    Issue numberSupplement 1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2015

    Fingerprint

    Curriculum
    Delivery of Health Care
    Teaching
    Students
    Focus Groups
    Education
    Health Personnel
    Caregivers
    Allied Health Personnel
    Dietetics
    Cost Savings
    Quality of Health Care
    Occupational Therapy
    Nursing Staff
    Health
    Midwifery
    Standard of Care
    Practice Guidelines
    Reading
    Patient Care

    Bibliographical note

    This paper is not available on the repository

    Keywords

    • Leadership
    • Healthcare
    • Pre-registration education

    Cite this

    Developing healthcare leaders for the 21st century: understanding and maximising leadership in pre-registration healthcare curricula in the West Midlands, UK. / Jones, L.; Torney, L.; Baxter, S.; Dudley, R.; Johnson, D.; O'Brien, A.; Owen, P.; Taylor, A.; Turner, A.

    In: Physiotherapy, Vol. 101, No. Supplement 1, 05.2015, p. e691-e692.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jones, L, Torney, L, Baxter, S, Dudley, R, Johnson, D, O'Brien, A, Owen, P, Taylor, A & Turner, A 2015, 'Developing healthcare leaders for the 21st century: understanding and maximising leadership in pre-registration healthcare curricula in the West Midlands, UK' Physiotherapy, vol. 101, no. Supplement 1, pp. e691-e692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3538
    Jones, L. ; Torney, L. ; Baxter, S. ; Dudley, R. ; Johnson, D. ; O'Brien, A. ; Owen, P. ; Taylor, A. ; Turner, A. / Developing healthcare leaders for the 21st century: understanding and maximising leadership in pre-registration healthcare curricula in the West Midlands, UK. In: Physiotherapy. 2015 ; Vol. 101, No. Supplement 1. pp. e691-e692.
    @article{56701441d3484cbea3282b4d913b2947,
    title = "Developing healthcare leaders for the 21st century: understanding and maximising leadership in pre-registration healthcare curricula in the West Midlands, UK",
    abstract = "Background: Effective and influential leadership within healthcare organisations is essential to ensure high standards and quality of care. To deliver this, healthcare providers and educators need to encourage leadership in professionals from the outset of their careers. Additionally, significant monies are spent on leadership development after initial qualification. Enhancement of leadership teaching and experience within the pre-registration curriculum could, therefore, lead to future cost savings as well as improved patient care. Collaboration between three UK Universities allowed an opportunity for perspectives to be gathered from six stakeholder groups relating to the curriculum, academic environment and clinical environment. Purpose: The project sought to enhance understanding of what a range of different stakeholders believed “excellent leadership” looked like, and explore how leadership was taught in pre-registration healthcare education, so enabling the development of best practice for preparing future healthcare leaders. Methods: Separate focus groups were held locally in the three University areas for each of the stakeholder groups: students; university lecturers; clinical and commissioning staff across nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, paramedic science and dietetic professions as well as service users and carers. Each focus group was facilitated by the same researcher and lasted approximately one hour. A semi-structured approach incorporating six questions was used. Audio-taped discussions were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was undertaken using content coding. This was validated by an approach of co-reading and agreement of themes within the research team. Results: Findings highlighted varying definitions of leadership and what participants perceived to be excellent or effective leadership. Participants commented on current methods of teaching leadership in undergraduate healthcare education, and how these methods could be enhanced. The value of multi-disciplinary learning, and good role-modelling in practice was identified as key to providing students with the essential leadership skills relevant to all healthcare professionals. Additionally, it was noted that leadership in healthcare education, although present, was not always recognised by as such by students, who did not necessarily appreciate leadership as a professional skill required by graduates. This was echoed by various participant groups including service users and carers, university educators and senior practice staff. Conclusion(s): The teaching of leadership should be “re-badged” and incorporated more overtly within all pre-registration health professional programmes. In addition, the relevance of leadership needs to be clarified and re-enforced within the academic as well as clinical setting. Good role modelling in practice is key to facilitating the development of early leadership skills. Implications: The results will inform the three participating universities and local healthcare providers on enhancing effective methods of incorporating leadership skills and qualities development in undergraduate curricula, and allow for sharing and communication of good practice, across the wider health economy.",
    keywords = "Leadership, Healthcare, Pre-registration education",
    author = "L. Jones and L. Torney and S. Baxter and R. Dudley and D. Johnson and A. O'Brien and P. Owen and A. Taylor and A. Turner",
    note = "This paper is not available on the repository",
    year = "2015",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3538",
    language = "English",
    volume = "101",
    pages = "e691--e692",
    journal = "Physiotherapy",
    issn = "0031-9406",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "Supplement 1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Developing healthcare leaders for the 21st century: understanding and maximising leadership in pre-registration healthcare curricula in the West Midlands, UK

    AU - Jones, L.

    AU - Torney, L.

    AU - Baxter, S.

    AU - Dudley, R.

    AU - Johnson, D.

    AU - O'Brien, A.

    AU - Owen, P.

    AU - Taylor, A.

    AU - Turner, A.

    N1 - This paper is not available on the repository

    PY - 2015/5

    Y1 - 2015/5

    N2 - Background: Effective and influential leadership within healthcare organisations is essential to ensure high standards and quality of care. To deliver this, healthcare providers and educators need to encourage leadership in professionals from the outset of their careers. Additionally, significant monies are spent on leadership development after initial qualification. Enhancement of leadership teaching and experience within the pre-registration curriculum could, therefore, lead to future cost savings as well as improved patient care. Collaboration between three UK Universities allowed an opportunity for perspectives to be gathered from six stakeholder groups relating to the curriculum, academic environment and clinical environment. Purpose: The project sought to enhance understanding of what a range of different stakeholders believed “excellent leadership” looked like, and explore how leadership was taught in pre-registration healthcare education, so enabling the development of best practice for preparing future healthcare leaders. Methods: Separate focus groups were held locally in the three University areas for each of the stakeholder groups: students; university lecturers; clinical and commissioning staff across nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, paramedic science and dietetic professions as well as service users and carers. Each focus group was facilitated by the same researcher and lasted approximately one hour. A semi-structured approach incorporating six questions was used. Audio-taped discussions were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was undertaken using content coding. This was validated by an approach of co-reading and agreement of themes within the research team. Results: Findings highlighted varying definitions of leadership and what participants perceived to be excellent or effective leadership. Participants commented on current methods of teaching leadership in undergraduate healthcare education, and how these methods could be enhanced. The value of multi-disciplinary learning, and good role-modelling in practice was identified as key to providing students with the essential leadership skills relevant to all healthcare professionals. Additionally, it was noted that leadership in healthcare education, although present, was not always recognised by as such by students, who did not necessarily appreciate leadership as a professional skill required by graduates. This was echoed by various participant groups including service users and carers, university educators and senior practice staff. Conclusion(s): The teaching of leadership should be “re-badged” and incorporated more overtly within all pre-registration health professional programmes. In addition, the relevance of leadership needs to be clarified and re-enforced within the academic as well as clinical setting. Good role modelling in practice is key to facilitating the development of early leadership skills. Implications: The results will inform the three participating universities and local healthcare providers on enhancing effective methods of incorporating leadership skills and qualities development in undergraduate curricula, and allow for sharing and communication of good practice, across the wider health economy.

    AB - Background: Effective and influential leadership within healthcare organisations is essential to ensure high standards and quality of care. To deliver this, healthcare providers and educators need to encourage leadership in professionals from the outset of their careers. Additionally, significant monies are spent on leadership development after initial qualification. Enhancement of leadership teaching and experience within the pre-registration curriculum could, therefore, lead to future cost savings as well as improved patient care. Collaboration between three UK Universities allowed an opportunity for perspectives to be gathered from six stakeholder groups relating to the curriculum, academic environment and clinical environment. Purpose: The project sought to enhance understanding of what a range of different stakeholders believed “excellent leadership” looked like, and explore how leadership was taught in pre-registration healthcare education, so enabling the development of best practice for preparing future healthcare leaders. Methods: Separate focus groups were held locally in the three University areas for each of the stakeholder groups: students; university lecturers; clinical and commissioning staff across nursing, midwifery, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, paramedic science and dietetic professions as well as service users and carers. Each focus group was facilitated by the same researcher and lasted approximately one hour. A semi-structured approach incorporating six questions was used. Audio-taped discussions were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was undertaken using content coding. This was validated by an approach of co-reading and agreement of themes within the research team. Results: Findings highlighted varying definitions of leadership and what participants perceived to be excellent or effective leadership. Participants commented on current methods of teaching leadership in undergraduate healthcare education, and how these methods could be enhanced. The value of multi-disciplinary learning, and good role-modelling in practice was identified as key to providing students with the essential leadership skills relevant to all healthcare professionals. Additionally, it was noted that leadership in healthcare education, although present, was not always recognised by as such by students, who did not necessarily appreciate leadership as a professional skill required by graduates. This was echoed by various participant groups including service users and carers, university educators and senior practice staff. Conclusion(s): The teaching of leadership should be “re-badged” and incorporated more overtly within all pre-registration health professional programmes. In addition, the relevance of leadership needs to be clarified and re-enforced within the academic as well as clinical setting. Good role modelling in practice is key to facilitating the development of early leadership skills. Implications: The results will inform the three participating universities and local healthcare providers on enhancing effective methods of incorporating leadership skills and qualities development in undergraduate curricula, and allow for sharing and communication of good practice, across the wider health economy.

    KW - Leadership

    KW - Healthcare

    KW - Pre-registration education

    U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3538

    DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.3538

    M3 - Article

    VL - 101

    SP - e691-e692

    JO - Physiotherapy

    JF - Physiotherapy

    SN - 0031-9406

    IS - Supplement 1

    ER -