Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise

M. J. Price, I. G. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the repeatability of a currently recommended protocol for determination of VO2 peak during upper body exercise involving a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (Hale et al. 1988), (2) whether employing a higher crank rate (70 rev min- 1) elicits higher VO2 peak values; (3) whether including an additional exercise stage 5 min after volitional exhaustion would elicit higher VO2 peak values. Twenty subjects (mean ± SD) age, height and body mass were 22·8 ± 1·8 years, 176 ± 5·0 cm and 77·5 ± 4·0 kg, respectively) visited the laboratory on three separate occassions. Subjects performed a different test to determine upper body VO2 peak on each visit. The tests were continuous and incremental in nature and were performed on a Monark cycle ergometer (Model 814E) adapted for arm exercise. Test 1 required subjects to exercise at a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (60RPM-1). Test 2 was identical to test 1 (60RPM-2) but after 5 min recovery from the test subjects performed a further exercise stage (60RPM-F). Test 3 employed a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (70RPM). Five minutes after volitional exhaustion a further exercise stage was performed (70RPM-F). The levels of agreement for the 60 rev min- 1 protocol were ± 0.50 1 min- 1. All VO2 peak values achieved were within these limits. However, a higher VO2 peak was achieved by employing a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (p< 0.05). The VO2 peak achieved for 60RPM-F was similar to 60RPM whereas the VO2 peak for 70RPM-F tended to be less than that for 70RPM (p = 0.064). The results of this study suggest that the 60 rev min- 1 protocol can reliably determine VO2 peak, however it would appear to be more appropriate to employ a 70 rev min- 1 protocol as higher values were attained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-499
Number of pages9
JournalErgonomics
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Exercise equipment
Body Height
Oxygen
Recovery
test subject
Values
caN protocol

Keywords

  • Arm crank ergometry
  • Peak oxygen uptake

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise. / Price, M. J.; Campbell, I. G.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.04.1997, p. 491-499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Price, M. J. ; Campbell, I. G. / Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise. In: Ergonomics. 1997 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 491-499.
@article{20a68c39035144fc8f98f579634dab54,
title = "Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the repeatability of a currently recommended protocol for determination of VO2 peak during upper body exercise involving a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (Hale et al. 1988), (2) whether employing a higher crank rate (70 rev min- 1) elicits higher VO2 peak values; (3) whether including an additional exercise stage 5 min after volitional exhaustion would elicit higher VO2 peak values. Twenty subjects (mean ± SD) age, height and body mass were 22·8 ± 1·8 years, 176 ± 5·0 cm and 77·5 ± 4·0 kg, respectively) visited the laboratory on three separate occassions. Subjects performed a different test to determine upper body VO2 peak on each visit. The tests were continuous and incremental in nature and were performed on a Monark cycle ergometer (Model 814E) adapted for arm exercise. Test 1 required subjects to exercise at a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (60RPM-1). Test 2 was identical to test 1 (60RPM-2) but after 5 min recovery from the test subjects performed a further exercise stage (60RPM-F). Test 3 employed a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (70RPM). Five minutes after volitional exhaustion a further exercise stage was performed (70RPM-F). The levels of agreement for the 60 rev min- 1 protocol were ± 0.50 1 min- 1. All VO2 peak values achieved were within these limits. However, a higher VO2 peak was achieved by employing a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (p< 0.05). The VO2 peak achieved for 60RPM-F was similar to 60RPM whereas the VO2 peak for 70RPM-F tended to be less than that for 70RPM (p = 0.064). The results of this study suggest that the 60 rev min- 1 protocol can reliably determine VO2 peak, however it would appear to be more appropriate to employ a 70 rev min- 1 protocol as higher values were attained.",
keywords = "Arm crank ergometry, Peak oxygen uptake",
author = "Price, {M. J.} and Campbell, {I. G.}",
year = "1997",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/001401397188116",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "491--499",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determination of peak oxygen uptake during upper body exercise

AU - Price, M. J.

AU - Campbell, I. G.

PY - 1997/4/1

Y1 - 1997/4/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the repeatability of a currently recommended protocol for determination of VO2 peak during upper body exercise involving a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (Hale et al. 1988), (2) whether employing a higher crank rate (70 rev min- 1) elicits higher VO2 peak values; (3) whether including an additional exercise stage 5 min after volitional exhaustion would elicit higher VO2 peak values. Twenty subjects (mean ± SD) age, height and body mass were 22·8 ± 1·8 years, 176 ± 5·0 cm and 77·5 ± 4·0 kg, respectively) visited the laboratory on three separate occassions. Subjects performed a different test to determine upper body VO2 peak on each visit. The tests were continuous and incremental in nature and were performed on a Monark cycle ergometer (Model 814E) adapted for arm exercise. Test 1 required subjects to exercise at a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (60RPM-1). Test 2 was identical to test 1 (60RPM-2) but after 5 min recovery from the test subjects performed a further exercise stage (60RPM-F). Test 3 employed a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (70RPM). Five minutes after volitional exhaustion a further exercise stage was performed (70RPM-F). The levels of agreement for the 60 rev min- 1 protocol were ± 0.50 1 min- 1. All VO2 peak values achieved were within these limits. However, a higher VO2 peak was achieved by employing a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (p< 0.05). The VO2 peak achieved for 60RPM-F was similar to 60RPM whereas the VO2 peak for 70RPM-F tended to be less than that for 70RPM (p = 0.064). The results of this study suggest that the 60 rev min- 1 protocol can reliably determine VO2 peak, however it would appear to be more appropriate to employ a 70 rev min- 1 protocol as higher values were attained.

AB - The purpose of this study was to determine (1) the repeatability of a currently recommended protocol for determination of VO2 peak during upper body exercise involving a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (Hale et al. 1988), (2) whether employing a higher crank rate (70 rev min- 1) elicits higher VO2 peak values; (3) whether including an additional exercise stage 5 min after volitional exhaustion would elicit higher VO2 peak values. Twenty subjects (mean ± SD) age, height and body mass were 22·8 ± 1·8 years, 176 ± 5·0 cm and 77·5 ± 4·0 kg, respectively) visited the laboratory on three separate occassions. Subjects performed a different test to determine upper body VO2 peak on each visit. The tests were continuous and incremental in nature and were performed on a Monark cycle ergometer (Model 814E) adapted for arm exercise. Test 1 required subjects to exercise at a crank rate of 60 rev min-1 (60RPM-1). Test 2 was identical to test 1 (60RPM-2) but after 5 min recovery from the test subjects performed a further exercise stage (60RPM-F). Test 3 employed a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (70RPM). Five minutes after volitional exhaustion a further exercise stage was performed (70RPM-F). The levels of agreement for the 60 rev min- 1 protocol were ± 0.50 1 min- 1. All VO2 peak values achieved were within these limits. However, a higher VO2 peak was achieved by employing a crank rate of 70 rev min- 1 (p< 0.05). The VO2 peak achieved for 60RPM-F was similar to 60RPM whereas the VO2 peak for 70RPM-F tended to be less than that for 70RPM (p = 0.064). The results of this study suggest that the 60 rev min- 1 protocol can reliably determine VO2 peak, however it would appear to be more appropriate to employ a 70 rev min- 1 protocol as higher values were attained.

KW - Arm crank ergometry

KW - Peak oxygen uptake

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031127962&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/001401397188116

DO - 10.1080/001401397188116

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 491

EP - 499

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 4

ER -