TY - JOUR
T1 - Deploying traditional and smartphone app survey methods in measuring door-to-door travel satisfaction in eight European cities
AU - Susilo, Yusak O.
AU - Woodcock, Andree
AU - Liotopoulos, Fotis
AU - Duarte, Andre
AU - Osmond, Jane
AU - Abenoza, Roberto F.
AU - Anghel, Lucian Emanuel
AU - Herrero, Dolores
AU - Fornari, Federico
AU - Tolio, Virginie
AU - O'Connell, Eileen
AU - Markucevičiūte, Ieva
AU - Kritharioti, Chrysoula
AU - Pirra, Miriam
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This study describes the lessons learned from designing, deploying and analysing the results from different travel satisfaction survey tools which measures the travellers' door-to-door travel satisfaction. The travel satisfaction measurement survey tools tested consisted of two types of smartphone applications (a satellite navigation app and a game app), an on-line survey, a paper-based semi-structured questionnaire and a focus group questionnaire. Each of the measurement tools comprised the same set of basic questions, but in different formats, aimed at exploring the pros and cons of each tool among different groups of travellers. The data collection was carried out at eight different European cities and five FIA motorist networks. 5,275 valid responses were gathered from the survey. Further analysis results show that different survey methods performed better in different sites. The satisfaction that was gathered via main trip leg does not necessarily correspond with overall satisfaction of the door-to-door journey. The results of this study highlight the need for more inclusive, complete, door-to-door, travel survey measurements.
AB - This study describes the lessons learned from designing, deploying and analysing the results from different travel satisfaction survey tools which measures the travellers' door-to-door travel satisfaction. The travel satisfaction measurement survey tools tested consisted of two types of smartphone applications (a satellite navigation app and a game app), an on-line survey, a paper-based semi-structured questionnaire and a focus group questionnaire. Each of the measurement tools comprised the same set of basic questions, but in different formats, aimed at exploring the pros and cons of each tool among different groups of travellers. The data collection was carried out at eight different European cities and five FIA motorist networks. 5,275 valid responses were gathered from the survey. Further analysis results show that different survey methods performed better in different sites. The satisfaction that was gathered via main trip leg does not necessarily correspond with overall satisfaction of the door-to-door journey. The results of this study highlight the need for more inclusive, complete, door-to-door, travel survey measurements.
KW - Door-to-door journey
KW - multimodal measurement
KW - on-line survey
KW - paper-based survey
KW - smartphone app survey
KW - travel satisfaction
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/deploying-traditional-smartphone-app-survey-methods-measuring-doortodoor-travel-satisfaction-eight-e
U2 - 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.434
DO - 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.434
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85019397791
SN - 2352-1457
VL - 25
SP - 2257
EP - 2275
JO - Transportation Research Procedia
JF - Transportation Research Procedia
T2 - World Conference on Transport Research
Y2 - 10 July 2016 through 15 July 2016
ER -