Demonstration and evaluation in design: debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments

Aysar Ghassan, Cyriel Diels, Alan Barrett

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Rooted in face-to-face teaching, the ‘top-down’ master-apprentice model is the dominant pedagogical approach in design education. Through reflecting on the results from two case studies, we discuss possible advantages and limitations of extending the master-apprentice model to asynchronous Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) with regards two overarching principles of design education— demonstration of skills and evaluation of the aesthetics of students’ designs. This debate is important as universities are predicted to increase their use of VLEs. Case study one describes an online system through which practical skills are demonstrated to students via a ‘master-apprentice style’ approach. Learners’ qualitative feedback suggests this method is beneficial. This infers that the master apprentice method may aid tutors to demonstrate practical skills in VLEs. Case study two describes an empirical investigation in which a homogeneous group of design educators (i.e. design experts) evaluate the aesthetic qualities of transport designs. In identifying a low level of agreement, these results query research which argues that experts are capable of delivering objective evaluations in terms of aesthetics. The results of case study two question how successfully the master-apprentice model can be applied to evaluate aesthetics in VLEs as such environments can lack an opportunity for nuances in communication between tutors and students to be propagated. We conclude by arguing the results presented in this paper may be related to inherent differences between demonstration and evaluation in design. We call for research on how best these constructs may be negotiated in the design of future VLEs.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations
    EditorsErik Bohemia, Arthur Eger, Wouter Eggink, Ahmed Kovacevic, Brian Parkinson, Wessel Wits
    PublisherDesign Society
    Pages203-208
    ISBN (Print)978-1-904670-56-8
    Publication statusPublished - 2014
    Event16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design - University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
    Duration: 4 Sep 20145 Sep 2014

    Publication series

    NameE&PDE
    PublisherDesign Society

    Conference

    Conference16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design
    CountryNetherlands
    CityEnschede
    Period4/09/145/09/14

    Fingerprint

    apprentice
    learning environment
    aesthetics
    evaluation
    tutor
    expert
    student
    research results
    education
    educator
    university
    communication
    lack
    Teaching
    Group

    Bibliographical note

    The full text of this item is not currently available from the repository.
    This paper was published in the proceedings of the 16th Engineering and Product Design Education conference, copyright © the Design Society.

    Keywords

    • design education
    • asynchronous communication
    • online tutorials
    • design evaluation

    Cite this

    Ghassan, A., Diels, C., & Barrett, A. (2014). Demonstration and evaluation in design: debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments. In E. Bohemia, A. Eger, W. Eggink, A. Kovacevic, B. Parkinson, & W. Wits (Eds.), DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations (pp. 203-208). (E&PDE). Design Society.

    Demonstration and evaluation in design : debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments. / Ghassan, Aysar; Diels, Cyriel; Barrett, Alan.

    DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations. ed. / Erik Bohemia; Arthur Eger; Wouter Eggink; Ahmed Kovacevic; Brian Parkinson; Wessel Wits. Design Society, 2014. p. 203-208 (E&PDE).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

    Ghassan, A, Diels, C & Barrett, A 2014, Demonstration and evaluation in design: debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments. in E Bohemia, A Eger, W Eggink, A Kovacevic, B Parkinson & W Wits (eds), DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations. E&PDE, Design Society, pp. 203-208, 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design, Enschede, Netherlands, 4/09/14.
    Ghassan A, Diels C, Barrett A. Demonstration and evaluation in design: debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments. In Bohemia E, Eger A, Eggink W, Kovacevic A, Parkinson B, Wits W, editors, DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations. Design Society. 2014. p. 203-208. (E&PDE).
    Ghassan, Aysar ; Diels, Cyriel ; Barrett, Alan. / Demonstration and evaluation in design : debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments. DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations. editor / Erik Bohemia ; Arthur Eger ; Wouter Eggink ; Ahmed Kovacevic ; Brian Parkinson ; Wessel Wits. Design Society, 2014. pp. 203-208 (E&PDE).
    @inproceedings{2c5aab4f6eb14ea3ab4f83b2089b47ea,
    title = "Demonstration and evaluation in design: debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments",
    abstract = "Rooted in face-to-face teaching, the ‘top-down’ master-apprentice model is the dominant pedagogical approach in design education. Through reflecting on the results from two case studies, we discuss possible advantages and limitations of extending the master-apprentice model to asynchronous Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) with regards two overarching principles of design education— demonstration of skills and evaluation of the aesthetics of students’ designs. This debate is important as universities are predicted to increase their use of VLEs. Case study one describes an online system through which practical skills are demonstrated to students via a ‘master-apprentice style’ approach. Learners’ qualitative feedback suggests this method is beneficial. This infers that the master apprentice method may aid tutors to demonstrate practical skills in VLEs. Case study two describes an empirical investigation in which a homogeneous group of design educators (i.e. design experts) evaluate the aesthetic qualities of transport designs. In identifying a low level of agreement, these results query research which argues that experts are capable of delivering objective evaluations in terms of aesthetics. The results of case study two question how successfully the master-apprentice model can be applied to evaluate aesthetics in VLEs as such environments can lack an opportunity for nuances in communication between tutors and students to be propagated. We conclude by arguing the results presented in this paper may be related to inherent differences between demonstration and evaluation in design. We call for research on how best these constructs may be negotiated in the design of future VLEs.",
    keywords = "design education, asynchronous communication, online tutorials, design evaluation",
    author = "Aysar Ghassan and Cyriel Diels and Alan Barrett",
    note = "The full text of this item is not currently available from the repository. This paper was published in the proceedings of the 16th Engineering and Product Design Education conference, copyright {\circledC} the Design Society.",
    year = "2014",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-904670-56-8",
    series = "E&PDE",
    publisher = "Design Society",
    pages = "203--208",
    editor = "Erik Bohemia and Arthur Eger and Wouter Eggink and Ahmed Kovacevic and Brian Parkinson and Wessel Wits",
    booktitle = "DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Demonstration and evaluation in design

    T2 - debating the use of the master-apprentice model in virtual learning environments

    AU - Ghassan, Aysar

    AU - Diels, Cyriel

    AU - Barrett, Alan

    N1 - The full text of this item is not currently available from the repository. This paper was published in the proceedings of the 16th Engineering and Product Design Education conference, copyright © the Design Society.

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Rooted in face-to-face teaching, the ‘top-down’ master-apprentice model is the dominant pedagogical approach in design education. Through reflecting on the results from two case studies, we discuss possible advantages and limitations of extending the master-apprentice model to asynchronous Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) with regards two overarching principles of design education— demonstration of skills and evaluation of the aesthetics of students’ designs. This debate is important as universities are predicted to increase their use of VLEs. Case study one describes an online system through which practical skills are demonstrated to students via a ‘master-apprentice style’ approach. Learners’ qualitative feedback suggests this method is beneficial. This infers that the master apprentice method may aid tutors to demonstrate practical skills in VLEs. Case study two describes an empirical investigation in which a homogeneous group of design educators (i.e. design experts) evaluate the aesthetic qualities of transport designs. In identifying a low level of agreement, these results query research which argues that experts are capable of delivering objective evaluations in terms of aesthetics. The results of case study two question how successfully the master-apprentice model can be applied to evaluate aesthetics in VLEs as such environments can lack an opportunity for nuances in communication between tutors and students to be propagated. We conclude by arguing the results presented in this paper may be related to inherent differences between demonstration and evaluation in design. We call for research on how best these constructs may be negotiated in the design of future VLEs.

    AB - Rooted in face-to-face teaching, the ‘top-down’ master-apprentice model is the dominant pedagogical approach in design education. Through reflecting on the results from two case studies, we discuss possible advantages and limitations of extending the master-apprentice model to asynchronous Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) with regards two overarching principles of design education— demonstration of skills and evaluation of the aesthetics of students’ designs. This debate is important as universities are predicted to increase their use of VLEs. Case study one describes an online system through which practical skills are demonstrated to students via a ‘master-apprentice style’ approach. Learners’ qualitative feedback suggests this method is beneficial. This infers that the master apprentice method may aid tutors to demonstrate practical skills in VLEs. Case study two describes an empirical investigation in which a homogeneous group of design educators (i.e. design experts) evaluate the aesthetic qualities of transport designs. In identifying a low level of agreement, these results query research which argues that experts are capable of delivering objective evaluations in terms of aesthetics. The results of case study two question how successfully the master-apprentice model can be applied to evaluate aesthetics in VLEs as such environments can lack an opportunity for nuances in communication between tutors and students to be propagated. We conclude by arguing the results presented in this paper may be related to inherent differences between demonstration and evaluation in design. We call for research on how best these constructs may be negotiated in the design of future VLEs.

    KW - design education

    KW - asynchronous communication

    KW - online tutorials

    KW - design evaluation

    M3 - Conference proceeding

    SN - 978-1-904670-56-8

    T3 - E&PDE

    SP - 203

    EP - 208

    BT - DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations

    A2 - Bohemia, Erik

    A2 - Eger, Arthur

    A2 - Eggink, Wouter

    A2 - Kovacevic, Ahmed

    A2 - Parkinson, Brian

    A2 - Wits, Wessel

    PB - Design Society

    ER -