Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units

  • William R Thomson
  • , Zudin Puthucheary
  • , Panayiotis Stavrinou
  • , Dalia Barghouthy
  • , Shreekant Champanerkar
  • , Douglas Findlay
  • , Sarah Gordon
  • , David McWilliams
  • , Kate Tantam
  • , Helen Woodward
  • , Timothy J Stephens
    • Barts Health NHS Trust
    • Queen Mary University of London
    • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    • Grange University Hospital
    • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
    • Royal Victoria Hospital
    • Queen's University Belfast
    • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    • Plymouth University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    52 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: The ICU Liberation Bundle was developed to improve outcomes for patients admitted to critical care. Despite a lack of Bundle adoption in the UK, the individual evidence-based practices (EBPs) within the bundle are defined as standards of care by the UK Intensive Care Society. There are limited data on the delivery of these EBPs.

    Objective: To evaluate current delivery of the EBPs of the ICU Liberation bundle in a sample of hospitals in the UK National Health Service (NHS) presenting delivery of EBP's between hospitals, their stability of delivery across multiple weeks and in comparison to US hospitals in the original ICU Liberation Bundle study.

    Methods: Multi-centre service evaluation, using modified definitions of compliance from the ICU Liberation Bundle study. We sampled six representative units from across the UK; data collection totalled 1116 patient days. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

    Results: Across all six units, patients received a median of 42.9% (IQR 40%-60%) of all possible bundle EBPs. Unit bundle proportional compliance (number of components completed/eligible number of components) ranged from 40.0% (IQR 28.6%-50.0%) to 71.4% (IQR 57.1%-80.0%). Units completed spontaneous awakening trials most regularly in 80.1% of eligible patients (149/186). Delirium assessments were the least adhered to EBP with only 32.2% (359/1116) of patients receiving at least two validated delirium assessments per day. Full bundle compliance was lower in the UK cohort in comparison to the original trial (4% vs 8%).

    Discussion: We identified substantial variation in the delivery of seven evidence-based practices that are considered standards of care in the UK. Variation existed between hospitals and within each hospital over time. These data begin to describe the current state of EBP adherence in a selection of critical care units.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)137-145
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of the Intensive Care Society
    Volume26
    Issue number2
    Early online date22 Nov 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2025

    Bibliographical note

    This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

    Keywords

    • Standards of care
    • evaluation
    • ICU liberation bundle
    • quality of care

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this