Defending the faith(s)? Democracy and hereditary right in England

Jackie Abell, Clifford Stevenson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The persistence of traditional monarchies in modern societies, which are otherwise characterized by democratic and egalitarian values, remains a paradox in the social sciences. In part this is attributable to the lack of psychological investigation into the relationship between subject and sovereign, and in particular the ways in which the political and social values of the citizenry shape understandings of a hereditary monarch's right to represent a national community. Adopting the qualitative analysis methods of discursive psychology and grounded theory, the current study examines vernacular accounts of nationhood and monarchy in England in both formalized conversational interviews (n = 60) and impromptu street interviews (n = 56). Focusing on accounts of Prince Charles's recent proposal to change the role of the monarch, from “Defender of the (Christian) Faith” to “Defender of Faiths,” those in favor treated it as a positive step towards reflecting a diverse (religious) community, bringing the monarchy into line with current concerns of pluralism and upholding values of personal choice and individual rights. Participants who rejected the proposed change in title construed it as antithetical to these values in terms of reflecting personal stake and interest, an abuse of power, or an imposition on other faiths. In all accounts, the prime concern was in safeguarding the political and social values of the citizenry. In conclusion it is argued that the study of subjects' relationship to the monarch, its function and legitimacy, can provide an opportunity to examine how values can characterize a national community and facilitate national diversity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)485-504
    Number of pages20
    JournalPolitical Psychology
    Volume32
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2011

    Fingerprint

    Democracy
    England
    faith
    Social Values
    democracy
    Interviews
    Psychology
    Cultural Diversity
    Values
    Illegitimacy
    monarchy
    Social Sciences
    religious community
    subject of study
    interview
    grounded theory
    pluralism
    community
    persistence
    Faith

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology(all)
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Defending the faith(s)? Democracy and hereditary right in England. / Abell, Jackie; Stevenson, Clifford.

    In: Political Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 15.02.2011, p. 485-504.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abell, Jackie ; Stevenson, Clifford. / Defending the faith(s)? Democracy and hereditary right in England. In: Political Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 485-504.
    @article{d71351f812124d4c9f7f9f402b910de2,
    title = "Defending the faith(s)?: Democracy and hereditary right in England",
    abstract = "The persistence of traditional monarchies in modern societies, which are otherwise characterized by democratic and egalitarian values, remains a paradox in the social sciences. In part this is attributable to the lack of psychological investigation into the relationship between subject and sovereign, and in particular the ways in which the political and social values of the citizenry shape understandings of a hereditary monarch's right to represent a national community. Adopting the qualitative analysis methods of discursive psychology and grounded theory, the current study examines vernacular accounts of nationhood and monarchy in England in both formalized conversational interviews (n = 60) and impromptu street interviews (n = 56). Focusing on accounts of Prince Charles's recent proposal to change the role of the monarch, from “Defender of the (Christian) Faith” to “Defender of Faiths,” those in favor treated it as a positive step towards reflecting a diverse (religious) community, bringing the monarchy into line with current concerns of pluralism and upholding values of personal choice and individual rights. Participants who rejected the proposed change in title construed it as antithetical to these values in terms of reflecting personal stake and interest, an abuse of power, or an imposition on other faiths. In all accounts, the prime concern was in safeguarding the political and social values of the citizenry. In conclusion it is argued that the study of subjects' relationship to the monarch, its function and legitimacy, can provide an opportunity to examine how values can characterize a national community and facilitate national diversity.",
    author = "Jackie Abell and Clifford Stevenson",
    year = "2011",
    month = "2",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00813.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "485--504",
    journal = "Political Psychology",
    issn = "0162-895X",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Defending the faith(s)?

    T2 - Democracy and hereditary right in England

    AU - Abell, Jackie

    AU - Stevenson, Clifford

    PY - 2011/2/15

    Y1 - 2011/2/15

    N2 - The persistence of traditional monarchies in modern societies, which are otherwise characterized by democratic and egalitarian values, remains a paradox in the social sciences. In part this is attributable to the lack of psychological investigation into the relationship between subject and sovereign, and in particular the ways in which the political and social values of the citizenry shape understandings of a hereditary monarch's right to represent a national community. Adopting the qualitative analysis methods of discursive psychology and grounded theory, the current study examines vernacular accounts of nationhood and monarchy in England in both formalized conversational interviews (n = 60) and impromptu street interviews (n = 56). Focusing on accounts of Prince Charles's recent proposal to change the role of the monarch, from “Defender of the (Christian) Faith” to “Defender of Faiths,” those in favor treated it as a positive step towards reflecting a diverse (religious) community, bringing the monarchy into line with current concerns of pluralism and upholding values of personal choice and individual rights. Participants who rejected the proposed change in title construed it as antithetical to these values in terms of reflecting personal stake and interest, an abuse of power, or an imposition on other faiths. In all accounts, the prime concern was in safeguarding the political and social values of the citizenry. In conclusion it is argued that the study of subjects' relationship to the monarch, its function and legitimacy, can provide an opportunity to examine how values can characterize a national community and facilitate national diversity.

    AB - The persistence of traditional monarchies in modern societies, which are otherwise characterized by democratic and egalitarian values, remains a paradox in the social sciences. In part this is attributable to the lack of psychological investigation into the relationship between subject and sovereign, and in particular the ways in which the political and social values of the citizenry shape understandings of a hereditary monarch's right to represent a national community. Adopting the qualitative analysis methods of discursive psychology and grounded theory, the current study examines vernacular accounts of nationhood and monarchy in England in both formalized conversational interviews (n = 60) and impromptu street interviews (n = 56). Focusing on accounts of Prince Charles's recent proposal to change the role of the monarch, from “Defender of the (Christian) Faith” to “Defender of Faiths,” those in favor treated it as a positive step towards reflecting a diverse (religious) community, bringing the monarchy into line with current concerns of pluralism and upholding values of personal choice and individual rights. Participants who rejected the proposed change in title construed it as antithetical to these values in terms of reflecting personal stake and interest, an abuse of power, or an imposition on other faiths. In all accounts, the prime concern was in safeguarding the political and social values of the citizenry. In conclusion it is argued that the study of subjects' relationship to the monarch, its function and legitimacy, can provide an opportunity to examine how values can characterize a national community and facilitate national diversity.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00813.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00813.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 485

    EP - 504

    JO - Political Psychology

    JF - Political Psychology

    SN - 0162-895X

    IS - 3

    ER -