Death salience moderates the effect of trauma on religiosity

Zoe Morris Trainor, Jonathan Jong, Matthias Bluemke, Jamin Halberstadt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown contradictory evidence for the relationship between religiosity and trauma; exposure to traumatic life events has been associated with both increases and decreases in religiosity over time. On the basis of a long theoretical tradition of linking death and religious belief and recent empirical evidence that thoughts of death may increase religiosity, we tested whether one determinant of trauma's influence on religion is the degree to which it makes death salient. METHOD: Using longitudinal data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a unique population-representative birth cohort, we tested whether the relationship between trauma and religiosity depends on whether the trauma involves death. Participants reported their private, ceremonial, and public religious behaviors at ages 26 and 32 and, at age 32, whether they had experienced any of 23 traumatic life events since age 26. RESULTS: Experiencing the death of a loved one (but not an equally traumatic event not involving death) predicted a future increase in private religious behavior (e.g., prayer) among those already practicing such behaviors, and an increase in the importance of religious ceremonies among those with relatively little prior interest in them. On the other hand, experiencing a death-unrelated trauma predicted a future reduction in public displays of religiosity among those previously so inclined. CONCLUSION: The study represents a significant step in understanding religious responses to trauma, and emphasizes the importance of considering not only the nature of a trauma, but also the dimensions and practices of a victim's religiosity prior to it. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-646
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Religion
Parturition
Health
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Death salience moderates the effect of trauma on religiosity. / Morris Trainor, Zoe; Jong, Jonathan; Bluemke, Matthias; Halberstadt, Jamin.

In: Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy, Vol. 11, No. 6, 01.09.2019, p. 639-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morris Trainor, Zoe ; Jong, Jonathan ; Bluemke, Matthias ; Halberstadt, Jamin. / Death salience moderates the effect of trauma on religiosity. In: Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy. 2019 ; Vol. 11, No. 6. pp. 639-646.
@article{9d7cd1ec7c75473eb3ecd7ed8eae3c7e,
title = "Death salience moderates the effect of trauma on religiosity",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown contradictory evidence for the relationship between religiosity and trauma; exposure to traumatic life events has been associated with both increases and decreases in religiosity over time. On the basis of a long theoretical tradition of linking death and religious belief and recent empirical evidence that thoughts of death may increase religiosity, we tested whether one determinant of trauma's influence on religion is the degree to which it makes death salient. METHOD: Using longitudinal data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a unique population-representative birth cohort, we tested whether the relationship between trauma and religiosity depends on whether the trauma involves death. Participants reported their private, ceremonial, and public religious behaviors at ages 26 and 32 and, at age 32, whether they had experienced any of 23 traumatic life events since age 26. RESULTS: Experiencing the death of a loved one (but not an equally traumatic event not involving death) predicted a future increase in private religious behavior (e.g., prayer) among those already practicing such behaviors, and an increase in the importance of religious ceremonies among those with relatively little prior interest in them. On the other hand, experiencing a death-unrelated trauma predicted a future reduction in public displays of religiosity among those previously so inclined. CONCLUSION: The study represents a significant step in understanding religious responses to trauma, and emphasizes the importance of considering not only the nature of a trauma, but also the dimensions and practices of a victim's religiosity prior to it. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).",
author = "{Morris Trainor}, Zoe and Jonathan Jong and Matthias Bluemke and Jamin Halberstadt",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/tra0000430",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "639--646",
journal = "Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy",
issn = "1942-9681",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Death salience moderates the effect of trauma on religiosity

AU - Morris Trainor, Zoe

AU - Jong, Jonathan

AU - Bluemke, Matthias

AU - Halberstadt, Jamin

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown contradictory evidence for the relationship between religiosity and trauma; exposure to traumatic life events has been associated with both increases and decreases in religiosity over time. On the basis of a long theoretical tradition of linking death and religious belief and recent empirical evidence that thoughts of death may increase religiosity, we tested whether one determinant of trauma's influence on religion is the degree to which it makes death salient. METHOD: Using longitudinal data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a unique population-representative birth cohort, we tested whether the relationship between trauma and religiosity depends on whether the trauma involves death. Participants reported their private, ceremonial, and public religious behaviors at ages 26 and 32 and, at age 32, whether they had experienced any of 23 traumatic life events since age 26. RESULTS: Experiencing the death of a loved one (but not an equally traumatic event not involving death) predicted a future increase in private religious behavior (e.g., prayer) among those already practicing such behaviors, and an increase in the importance of religious ceremonies among those with relatively little prior interest in them. On the other hand, experiencing a death-unrelated trauma predicted a future reduction in public displays of religiosity among those previously so inclined. CONCLUSION: The study represents a significant step in understanding religious responses to trauma, and emphasizes the importance of considering not only the nature of a trauma, but also the dimensions and practices of a victim's religiosity prior to it. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - OBJECTIVE: Previous research has shown contradictory evidence for the relationship between religiosity and trauma; exposure to traumatic life events has been associated with both increases and decreases in religiosity over time. On the basis of a long theoretical tradition of linking death and religious belief and recent empirical evidence that thoughts of death may increase religiosity, we tested whether one determinant of trauma's influence on religion is the degree to which it makes death salient. METHOD: Using longitudinal data from the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study, a unique population-representative birth cohort, we tested whether the relationship between trauma and religiosity depends on whether the trauma involves death. Participants reported their private, ceremonial, and public religious behaviors at ages 26 and 32 and, at age 32, whether they had experienced any of 23 traumatic life events since age 26. RESULTS: Experiencing the death of a loved one (but not an equally traumatic event not involving death) predicted a future increase in private religious behavior (e.g., prayer) among those already practicing such behaviors, and an increase in the importance of religious ceremonies among those with relatively little prior interest in them. On the other hand, experiencing a death-unrelated trauma predicted a future reduction in public displays of religiosity among those previously so inclined. CONCLUSION: The study represents a significant step in understanding religious responses to trauma, and emphasizes the importance of considering not only the nature of a trauma, but also the dimensions and practices of a victim's religiosity prior to it. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071763382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/tra0000430

DO - 10.1037/tra0000430

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 639

EP - 646

JO - Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy

JF - Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy

SN - 1942-9681

IS - 6

ER -