Deaf and hearing children's plural noun spelling

Helen L. Breadmore, Andrew C. Olson, Andrea Krott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examines deaf and hearing children's spelling of plural nouns. Severe literacy impairments are well documented in the deaf, which are believed to be a consequence of phonological awareness limitations. Fifty deaf (mean chronological age 13;10 years, mean reading age 7;5 years) and 50 reading-age-matched hearing children produced spellings of regular, semiregular, and irregular plural nouns in Experiment 1 and nonword plurals in Experiment 2. Deaf children performed reading-age appropriately on rule-based (regular and semiregular) plurals but were significantly less accurate at spelling irregular plurals. Spelling of plural nonwords and spelling error analyses revealed clear evidence for use of morphology. Deaf children used morphological generalization to a greater degree than their reading-age-matched hearing counterparts. Also, hearing children combined use of phonology and morphology to guide spelling, whereas deaf children appeared to use morphology without phonological mediation. Therefore, use of morphology in spelling can be independent of phonology and is available to the deaf despite limited experience with spoken language. Indeed, deaf children appear to be learning about morphology from the orthography. Education on more complex morphological generalization and exceptions may be highly beneficial not only for the deaf but also for other populations with phonological awareness limitations.

LanguageEnglish
Pages2169-2192
Number of pages24
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume65
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hearing
Reading
Language
Learning
Education
Population

Keywords

  • Deaf
  • Inflection
  • Literacy development
  • Morphology
  • Spelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Deaf and hearing children's plural noun spelling. / Breadmore, Helen L.; Olson, Andrew C.; Krott, Andrea.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 11, 11.2012, p. 2169-2192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Breadmore, Helen L. ; Olson, Andrew C. ; Krott, Andrea. / Deaf and hearing children's plural noun spelling. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 65, No. 11. pp. 2169-2192.
@article{b753f48d412c40c99b50ec7133c02e4a,
title = "Deaf and hearing children's plural noun spelling",
abstract = "The present study examines deaf and hearing children's spelling of plural nouns. Severe literacy impairments are well documented in the deaf, which are believed to be a consequence of phonological awareness limitations. Fifty deaf (mean chronological age 13;10 years, mean reading age 7;5 years) and 50 reading-age-matched hearing children produced spellings of regular, semiregular, and irregular plural nouns in Experiment 1 and nonword plurals in Experiment 2. Deaf children performed reading-age appropriately on rule-based (regular and semiregular) plurals but were significantly less accurate at spelling irregular plurals. Spelling of plural nonwords and spelling error analyses revealed clear evidence for use of morphology. Deaf children used morphological generalization to a greater degree than their reading-age-matched hearing counterparts. Also, hearing children combined use of phonology and morphology to guide spelling, whereas deaf children appeared to use morphology without phonological mediation. Therefore, use of morphology in spelling can be independent of phonology and is available to the deaf despite limited experience with spoken language. Indeed, deaf children appear to be learning about morphology from the orthography. Education on more complex morphological generalization and exceptions may be highly beneficial not only for the deaf but also for other populations with phonological awareness limitations.",
keywords = "Deaf, Inflection, Literacy development, Morphology, Spelling",
author = "Breadmore, {Helen L.} and Olson, {Andrew C.} and Andrea Krott",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2012.684694",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "2169--2192",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deaf and hearing children's plural noun spelling

AU - Breadmore, Helen L.

AU - Olson, Andrew C.

AU - Krott, Andrea

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - The present study examines deaf and hearing children's spelling of plural nouns. Severe literacy impairments are well documented in the deaf, which are believed to be a consequence of phonological awareness limitations. Fifty deaf (mean chronological age 13;10 years, mean reading age 7;5 years) and 50 reading-age-matched hearing children produced spellings of regular, semiregular, and irregular plural nouns in Experiment 1 and nonword plurals in Experiment 2. Deaf children performed reading-age appropriately on rule-based (regular and semiregular) plurals but were significantly less accurate at spelling irregular plurals. Spelling of plural nonwords and spelling error analyses revealed clear evidence for use of morphology. Deaf children used morphological generalization to a greater degree than their reading-age-matched hearing counterparts. Also, hearing children combined use of phonology and morphology to guide spelling, whereas deaf children appeared to use morphology without phonological mediation. Therefore, use of morphology in spelling can be independent of phonology and is available to the deaf despite limited experience with spoken language. Indeed, deaf children appear to be learning about morphology from the orthography. Education on more complex morphological generalization and exceptions may be highly beneficial not only for the deaf but also for other populations with phonological awareness limitations.

AB - The present study examines deaf and hearing children's spelling of plural nouns. Severe literacy impairments are well documented in the deaf, which are believed to be a consequence of phonological awareness limitations. Fifty deaf (mean chronological age 13;10 years, mean reading age 7;5 years) and 50 reading-age-matched hearing children produced spellings of regular, semiregular, and irregular plural nouns in Experiment 1 and nonword plurals in Experiment 2. Deaf children performed reading-age appropriately on rule-based (regular and semiregular) plurals but were significantly less accurate at spelling irregular plurals. Spelling of plural nonwords and spelling error analyses revealed clear evidence for use of morphology. Deaf children used morphological generalization to a greater degree than their reading-age-matched hearing counterparts. Also, hearing children combined use of phonology and morphology to guide spelling, whereas deaf children appeared to use morphology without phonological mediation. Therefore, use of morphology in spelling can be independent of phonology and is available to the deaf despite limited experience with spoken language. Indeed, deaf children appear to be learning about morphology from the orthography. Education on more complex morphological generalization and exceptions may be highly beneficial not only for the deaf but also for other populations with phonological awareness limitations.

KW - Deaf

KW - Inflection

KW - Literacy development

KW - Morphology

KW - Spelling

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2012.684694

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2012.684694

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 2169

EP - 2192

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

T2 - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 11

ER -