Critical healthcare management studies: green shoots

Martin Kitchener, Aoife M McDermott, Simon Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – While critical approaches have enriched research in proximate fields, their impact has been less marked in studies of healthcare management. In response, the 2016 Organizational Behaviour in Health Care Conference hosted its first-ever session dedicated to the emergent field of critical healthcare management studies (CHMSs). The purpose of this paper is to present five papers selected from that conference. Design/methodology/approach – Inthisintroductory paper, the authors frame the contributions as “green shoots” in a field of CHMS which contains four main furrows of activity: questioning the taken-for-granted; moving beyond instrumentalism; reflexivity and meanings in research; and challenging structures of domination (Kitchener and Thomas, 2016). The authors conclude by presenting an agenda for further cultivating the field of CHMS. Findings – The papers evidence the value of CHMS, and provide insight into the benefits of broadening theoretical and methodological approaches in pursuit of critical insights. Researchlimitations/implications–CHMSworkstoexplicatethemultipleandcompetingideologiesand interests inherent in healthcare. As pragmaticimperatives push the provision of health and social care out of the organisational contexts and into private space, there is a particular need to simultaneously understand, and critically interrogate, the implications of new, as well as existing, forms of care. Practical implications – This paper reviews, frames and details practical next steps in developing CHMS. These include: enhanced engagement with a wider range of actors than is currently the norm in mainstream healthcare management research; a broadening of theoretical and methodological lenses; support for critical approaches among editors and reviewers; and enhanced communication of critical research via its incorporation into education and training programmes. Originality/value – The paper contributes to an emerging stream of CHMS research, and works to consolidate next steps for the field. Keywords Reflexivity, Critical healthcare management studies, Questioning the taken-for-granted, Beyond instrumentalism, Structures of domination Paper type Research paper
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)530-541
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Health Organization and Management
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Delivery of Health Care
Research
Management studies
Health care management
Education
Health Services Research
Lenses
Healthcare

Keywords

  • Reflexivity
  • Critical healthcare management studies
  • Questioning the taken-for-granted
  • Beyond instrumentalism
  • Structures of domination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Critical healthcare management studies : green shoots. / Kitchener, Martin; McDermott, Aoife M; Cooper, Simon.

In: Journal of Health Organization and Management, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.10.2017, p. 530-541.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kitchener, Martin ; McDermott, Aoife M ; Cooper, Simon. / Critical healthcare management studies : green shoots. In: Journal of Health Organization and Management. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 530-541.
@article{1f0cc20945f5468286d8e6eb90e29137,
title = "Critical healthcare management studies: green shoots",
abstract = "Purpose – While critical approaches have enriched research in proximate fields, their impact has been less marked in studies of healthcare management. In response, the 2016 Organizational Behaviour in Health Care Conference hosted its first-ever session dedicated to the emergent field of critical healthcare management studies (CHMSs). The purpose of this paper is to present five papers selected from that conference. Design/methodology/approach – Inthisintroductory paper, the authors frame the contributions as “green shoots” in a field of CHMS which contains four main furrows of activity: questioning the taken-for-granted; moving beyond instrumentalism; reflexivity and meanings in research; and challenging structures of domination (Kitchener and Thomas, 2016). The authors conclude by presenting an agenda for further cultivating the field of CHMS. Findings – The papers evidence the value of CHMS, and provide insight into the benefits of broadening theoretical and methodological approaches in pursuit of critical insights. Researchlimitations/implications–CHMSworkstoexplicatethemultipleandcompetingideologiesand interests inherent in healthcare. As pragmaticimperatives push the provision of health and social care out of the organisational contexts and into private space, there is a particular need to simultaneously understand, and critically interrogate, the implications of new, as well as existing, forms of care. Practical implications – This paper reviews, frames and details practical next steps in developing CHMS. These include: enhanced engagement with a wider range of actors than is currently the norm in mainstream healthcare management research; a broadening of theoretical and methodological lenses; support for critical approaches among editors and reviewers; and enhanced communication of critical research via its incorporation into education and training programmes. Originality/value – The paper contributes to an emerging stream of CHMS research, and works to consolidate next steps for the field. Keywords Reflexivity, Critical healthcare management studies, Questioning the taken-for-granted, Beyond instrumentalism, Structures of domination Paper type Research paper",
keywords = "Reflexivity, Critical healthcare management studies, Questioning the taken-for-granted, Beyond instrumentalism, Structures of domination",
author = "Martin Kitchener and McDermott, {Aoife M} and Simon Cooper",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JHOM-07-2017-0187",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "530--541",
journal = "Journal of Health, Organisation and Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical healthcare management studies

T2 - green shoots

AU - Kitchener, Martin

AU - McDermott, Aoife M

AU - Cooper, Simon

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Purpose – While critical approaches have enriched research in proximate fields, their impact has been less marked in studies of healthcare management. In response, the 2016 Organizational Behaviour in Health Care Conference hosted its first-ever session dedicated to the emergent field of critical healthcare management studies (CHMSs). The purpose of this paper is to present five papers selected from that conference. Design/methodology/approach – Inthisintroductory paper, the authors frame the contributions as “green shoots” in a field of CHMS which contains four main furrows of activity: questioning the taken-for-granted; moving beyond instrumentalism; reflexivity and meanings in research; and challenging structures of domination (Kitchener and Thomas, 2016). The authors conclude by presenting an agenda for further cultivating the field of CHMS. Findings – The papers evidence the value of CHMS, and provide insight into the benefits of broadening theoretical and methodological approaches in pursuit of critical insights. Researchlimitations/implications–CHMSworkstoexplicatethemultipleandcompetingideologiesand interests inherent in healthcare. As pragmaticimperatives push the provision of health and social care out of the organisational contexts and into private space, there is a particular need to simultaneously understand, and critically interrogate, the implications of new, as well as existing, forms of care. Practical implications – This paper reviews, frames and details practical next steps in developing CHMS. These include: enhanced engagement with a wider range of actors than is currently the norm in mainstream healthcare management research; a broadening of theoretical and methodological lenses; support for critical approaches among editors and reviewers; and enhanced communication of critical research via its incorporation into education and training programmes. Originality/value – The paper contributes to an emerging stream of CHMS research, and works to consolidate next steps for the field. Keywords Reflexivity, Critical healthcare management studies, Questioning the taken-for-granted, Beyond instrumentalism, Structures of domination Paper type Research paper

AB - Purpose – While critical approaches have enriched research in proximate fields, their impact has been less marked in studies of healthcare management. In response, the 2016 Organizational Behaviour in Health Care Conference hosted its first-ever session dedicated to the emergent field of critical healthcare management studies (CHMSs). The purpose of this paper is to present five papers selected from that conference. Design/methodology/approach – Inthisintroductory paper, the authors frame the contributions as “green shoots” in a field of CHMS which contains four main furrows of activity: questioning the taken-for-granted; moving beyond instrumentalism; reflexivity and meanings in research; and challenging structures of domination (Kitchener and Thomas, 2016). The authors conclude by presenting an agenda for further cultivating the field of CHMS. Findings – The papers evidence the value of CHMS, and provide insight into the benefits of broadening theoretical and methodological approaches in pursuit of critical insights. Researchlimitations/implications–CHMSworkstoexplicatethemultipleandcompetingideologiesand interests inherent in healthcare. As pragmaticimperatives push the provision of health and social care out of the organisational contexts and into private space, there is a particular need to simultaneously understand, and critically interrogate, the implications of new, as well as existing, forms of care. Practical implications – This paper reviews, frames and details practical next steps in developing CHMS. These include: enhanced engagement with a wider range of actors than is currently the norm in mainstream healthcare management research; a broadening of theoretical and methodological lenses; support for critical approaches among editors and reviewers; and enhanced communication of critical research via its incorporation into education and training programmes. Originality/value – The paper contributes to an emerging stream of CHMS research, and works to consolidate next steps for the field. Keywords Reflexivity, Critical healthcare management studies, Questioning the taken-for-granted, Beyond instrumentalism, Structures of domination Paper type Research paper

KW - Reflexivity

KW - Critical healthcare management studies

KW - Questioning the taken-for-granted

KW - Beyond instrumentalism

KW - Structures of domination

U2 - 10.1108/JHOM-07-2017-0187

DO - 10.1108/JHOM-07-2017-0187

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 530

EP - 541

JO - Journal of Health, Organisation and Management

JF - Journal of Health, Organisation and Management

SN - 1477-7266

IS - 5

ER -