Critical factors for insolvency prediction: towards a theoretical model for the construction industry

Hafiz A. Alaka, Lukumon O. Oyedele, Hakeem A. Owolabi, Azeez A. Oyedele, Olugbenga O. Akinade, Muhammad Bilal, Saheed O. Ajayi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many construction industry insolvency prediction model (CI-IPM) studies have arbitrarily employed or simply adopted from previous studies different insolvency factors, without justification, leading to poorly performing CI-IPMs. This is due to the absence of a framework for selection of relevant factors. To identify the most important insolvency factors for a high-performance CI-IPM, this study used three approaches. Firstly, systematic review was used to identify all existing factors. Secondly, frequency of factor use and accuracy of models in the reviewed studies were analysed to establish the important factors. Finally, using a questionnaire survey of CI professionals, the importance levels of factors were validated using the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and significant index ranking. The findings show that the important quantitative factors are profitability, liquidity, leverage, management efficiency and cash flow. While important qualitative factors are management/owner characteristics, internal strategy, management decision making, macroeconomic firm characteristics and sustainability. These factors, which align with existing insolvency-related theories, including Porter's five competitive forces and Mintzberg's 5Ps (plan, ploy, pattern, position and perspective) of strategy, were used to develop a theoretical framework. This study contributes to the debate on the need to amalgamate qualitative and quantitative factors to develop a valid CI-IPM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-49
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Construction Management
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Construction industry
Sustainable development
Profitability
Decision making
Prediction
Critical factors
Factors
Insolvency

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Construction Management on 10th May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546

Keywords

  • construction industry
  • construction industry insolvency factors
  • failure
  • financial ratios
  • insolvency prediction model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Alaka, H. A., Oyedele, L. O., Owolabi, H. A., Oyedele, A. A., Akinade, O. O., Bilal, M., & Ajayi, S. O. (2017). Critical factors for insolvency prediction: towards a theoretical model for the construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 17(1), 25-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546

Critical factors for insolvency prediction : towards a theoretical model for the construction industry. / Alaka, Hafiz A.; Oyedele, Lukumon O.; Owolabi, Hakeem A.; Oyedele, Azeez A.; Akinade, Olugbenga O.; Bilal, Muhammad; Ajayi, Saheed O.

In: International Journal of Construction Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 25-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alaka, Hafiz A. ; Oyedele, Lukumon O. ; Owolabi, Hakeem A. ; Oyedele, Azeez A. ; Akinade, Olugbenga O. ; Bilal, Muhammad ; Ajayi, Saheed O. / Critical factors for insolvency prediction : towards a theoretical model for the construction industry. In: International Journal of Construction Management. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 25-49.
@article{bfcf7fbbd8c0429c82cd2de2b2cf25b6,
title = "Critical factors for insolvency prediction: towards a theoretical model for the construction industry",
abstract = "Many construction industry insolvency prediction model (CI-IPM) studies have arbitrarily employed or simply adopted from previous studies different insolvency factors, without justification, leading to poorly performing CI-IPMs. This is due to the absence of a framework for selection of relevant factors. To identify the most important insolvency factors for a high-performance CI-IPM, this study used three approaches. Firstly, systematic review was used to identify all existing factors. Secondly, frequency of factor use and accuracy of models in the reviewed studies were analysed to establish the important factors. Finally, using a questionnaire survey of CI professionals, the importance levels of factors were validated using the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and significant index ranking. The findings show that the important quantitative factors are profitability, liquidity, leverage, management efficiency and cash flow. While important qualitative factors are management/owner characteristics, internal strategy, management decision making, macroeconomic firm characteristics and sustainability. These factors, which align with existing insolvency-related theories, including Porter's five competitive forces and Mintzberg's 5Ps (plan, ploy, pattern, position and perspective) of strategy, were used to develop a theoretical framework. This study contributes to the debate on the need to amalgamate qualitative and quantitative factors to develop a valid CI-IPM.",
keywords = "construction industry, construction industry insolvency factors, failure, financial ratios, insolvency prediction model",
author = "Alaka, {Hafiz A.} and Oyedele, {Lukumon O.} and Owolabi, {Hakeem A.} and Oyedele, {Azeez A.} and Akinade, {Olugbenga O.} and Muhammad Bilal and Ajayi, {Saheed O.}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Construction Management on 10th May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "25--49",
journal = "International Journal of Construction Management",
issn = "1562-3599",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Critical factors for insolvency prediction

T2 - towards a theoretical model for the construction industry

AU - Alaka, Hafiz A.

AU - Oyedele, Lukumon O.

AU - Owolabi, Hakeem A.

AU - Oyedele, Azeez A.

AU - Akinade, Olugbenga O.

AU - Bilal, Muhammad

AU - Ajayi, Saheed O.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Construction Management on 10th May 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - Many construction industry insolvency prediction model (CI-IPM) studies have arbitrarily employed or simply adopted from previous studies different insolvency factors, without justification, leading to poorly performing CI-IPMs. This is due to the absence of a framework for selection of relevant factors. To identify the most important insolvency factors for a high-performance CI-IPM, this study used three approaches. Firstly, systematic review was used to identify all existing factors. Secondly, frequency of factor use and accuracy of models in the reviewed studies were analysed to establish the important factors. Finally, using a questionnaire survey of CI professionals, the importance levels of factors were validated using the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and significant index ranking. The findings show that the important quantitative factors are profitability, liquidity, leverage, management efficiency and cash flow. While important qualitative factors are management/owner characteristics, internal strategy, management decision making, macroeconomic firm characteristics and sustainability. These factors, which align with existing insolvency-related theories, including Porter's five competitive forces and Mintzberg's 5Ps (plan, ploy, pattern, position and perspective) of strategy, were used to develop a theoretical framework. This study contributes to the debate on the need to amalgamate qualitative and quantitative factors to develop a valid CI-IPM.

AB - Many construction industry insolvency prediction model (CI-IPM) studies have arbitrarily employed or simply adopted from previous studies different insolvency factors, without justification, leading to poorly performing CI-IPMs. This is due to the absence of a framework for selection of relevant factors. To identify the most important insolvency factors for a high-performance CI-IPM, this study used three approaches. Firstly, systematic review was used to identify all existing factors. Secondly, frequency of factor use and accuracy of models in the reviewed studies were analysed to establish the important factors. Finally, using a questionnaire survey of CI professionals, the importance levels of factors were validated using the Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient and significant index ranking. The findings show that the important quantitative factors are profitability, liquidity, leverage, management efficiency and cash flow. While important qualitative factors are management/owner characteristics, internal strategy, management decision making, macroeconomic firm characteristics and sustainability. These factors, which align with existing insolvency-related theories, including Porter's five competitive forces and Mintzberg's 5Ps (plan, ploy, pattern, position and perspective) of strategy, were used to develop a theoretical framework. This study contributes to the debate on the need to amalgamate qualitative and quantitative factors to develop a valid CI-IPM.

KW - construction industry

KW - construction industry insolvency factors

KW - failure

KW - financial ratios

KW - insolvency prediction model

U2 - 10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546

DO - 10.1080/15623599.2016.1166546

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 25

EP - 49

JO - International Journal of Construction Management

JF - International Journal of Construction Management

SN - 1562-3599

IS - 1

ER -