Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Criteria-Led Discharge—Patient Safety and Satisfaction, Length of Stay, and Facilitators for Implementation: A Systematic Review Update

  • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
  • NHS England – Midlands

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:
Delayed patient discharge affects patient safety, care quality, and hospital flow. Criteria-led discharge (CLD) enables appropriately trained health care professionals to discharge selected patients against predefined clinical criteria, potentially improving timeliness.

Purpose:
The purpose of this updated systematic review was to assess outcomes including CLD safety, patient satisfaction, length of stay (LOS), and implementation factors.

Methods:
A systematic review was conducted. CINAHL and Medline were searched from 2018 to 2025.

Results:
Thirteen studies spanning adult and pediatric settings were included. CLD was consistently safe when supported by clear criteria, protocols, and safety-netting; readmission findings were mixed. Most studies reported reduced LOS, earlier discharge, and improved flow. Evidence on patient satisfaction was limited. Key facilitators included staff training, organizational support, and integration of CLD into routine processes.

Conclusion:
CLD is a safe intervention that improves discharge efficiency and LOS with growing applicability across nonelective pathways and potential scalability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-Press)
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nursing Care Quality
Volume(In-Press)
Early online date11 Aug 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Aug 2026

Keywords

  • patient discharge
  • patient flow
  • patient readmissions
  • safety netting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criteria-Led Discharge—Patient Safety and Satisfaction, Length of Stay, and Facilitators for Implementation: A Systematic Review Update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this