Criteria guiding segmentation implementation: Reviewing the evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The benefits which market segmentation offers are well established, yet businesses continue to report implementation difficulties. Many complain about a paucity of practical assistance for those carrying out segmentation studies. The most common guidance available consists of simple checklists of criteria, such as those presented by Kotler who states that segments should be measurable, accessible, substantial and actionable. Despite widespread recognition of these criteria, such lists are limited in two ways. First, it is difficult to judge the completeness of such lists and second, insufficient guidance is given on exactly how and when the criteria should be applied. This paper comprehensively reviews and classifies the literature on segmentation criteria. The classification scheme highlights the diversity of published criteria and pinpoints when in the segmentation process they should be applied. A model is developed which illustrates the relationship between different types of segmentation criteria. The model highlights the contrasts and overlaps between different areas of the literature and helps set a research agenda. The paper concludes that criteria focusing solely on segmentation output provide insufficient implementation guidance. Three types of criteria are needed, focusing before, during and after the segmentation process. While the market segmentation literature gives considerable attention to the during and after stages, the discussion is confusing. Segmentation success factors which can be applied before the process begins are hardly considered at all.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-129
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Strategic Marketing
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reviewing
Segmentation
Guidance
Market segmentation
Check list
Success factors
Completeness
Classification schemes
Research agenda

Keywords

  • Implementation
  • Segmentation
  • Segmentation criteria
  • Success factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Strategy and Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

Criteria guiding segmentation implementation : Reviewing the evidence. / Dibb, Sally.

In: Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.01.1999, p. 107-129.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c108984ca9649e08a47dd1ae9f2b01e,
title = "Criteria guiding segmentation implementation: Reviewing the evidence",
abstract = "The benefits which market segmentation offers are well established, yet businesses continue to report implementation difficulties. Many complain about a paucity of practical assistance for those carrying out segmentation studies. The most common guidance available consists of simple checklists of criteria, such as those presented by Kotler who states that segments should be measurable, accessible, substantial and actionable. Despite widespread recognition of these criteria, such lists are limited in two ways. First, it is difficult to judge the completeness of such lists and second, insufficient guidance is given on exactly how and when the criteria should be applied. This paper comprehensively reviews and classifies the literature on segmentation criteria. The classification scheme highlights the diversity of published criteria and pinpoints when in the segmentation process they should be applied. A model is developed which illustrates the relationship between different types of segmentation criteria. The model highlights the contrasts and overlaps between different areas of the literature and helps set a research agenda. The paper concludes that criteria focusing solely on segmentation output provide insufficient implementation guidance. Three types of criteria are needed, focusing before, during and after the segmentation process. While the market segmentation literature gives considerable attention to the during and after stages, the discussion is confusing. Segmentation success factors which can be applied before the process begins are hardly considered at all.",
keywords = "Implementation, Segmentation, Segmentation criteria, Success factors",
author = "Sally Dibb",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/096525499346477",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "107--129",
journal = "Journal of Strategic Marketing",
issn = "0965-254X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Criteria guiding segmentation implementation

T2 - Reviewing the evidence

AU - Dibb, Sally

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - The benefits which market segmentation offers are well established, yet businesses continue to report implementation difficulties. Many complain about a paucity of practical assistance for those carrying out segmentation studies. The most common guidance available consists of simple checklists of criteria, such as those presented by Kotler who states that segments should be measurable, accessible, substantial and actionable. Despite widespread recognition of these criteria, such lists are limited in two ways. First, it is difficult to judge the completeness of such lists and second, insufficient guidance is given on exactly how and when the criteria should be applied. This paper comprehensively reviews and classifies the literature on segmentation criteria. The classification scheme highlights the diversity of published criteria and pinpoints when in the segmentation process they should be applied. A model is developed which illustrates the relationship between different types of segmentation criteria. The model highlights the contrasts and overlaps between different areas of the literature and helps set a research agenda. The paper concludes that criteria focusing solely on segmentation output provide insufficient implementation guidance. Three types of criteria are needed, focusing before, during and after the segmentation process. While the market segmentation literature gives considerable attention to the during and after stages, the discussion is confusing. Segmentation success factors which can be applied before the process begins are hardly considered at all.

AB - The benefits which market segmentation offers are well established, yet businesses continue to report implementation difficulties. Many complain about a paucity of practical assistance for those carrying out segmentation studies. The most common guidance available consists of simple checklists of criteria, such as those presented by Kotler who states that segments should be measurable, accessible, substantial and actionable. Despite widespread recognition of these criteria, such lists are limited in two ways. First, it is difficult to judge the completeness of such lists and second, insufficient guidance is given on exactly how and when the criteria should be applied. This paper comprehensively reviews and classifies the literature on segmentation criteria. The classification scheme highlights the diversity of published criteria and pinpoints when in the segmentation process they should be applied. A model is developed which illustrates the relationship between different types of segmentation criteria. The model highlights the contrasts and overlaps between different areas of the literature and helps set a research agenda. The paper concludes that criteria focusing solely on segmentation output provide insufficient implementation guidance. Three types of criteria are needed, focusing before, during and after the segmentation process. While the market segmentation literature gives considerable attention to the during and after stages, the discussion is confusing. Segmentation success factors which can be applied before the process begins are hardly considered at all.

KW - Implementation

KW - Segmentation

KW - Segmentation criteria

KW - Success factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916967873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/096525499346477

DO - 10.1080/096525499346477

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 107

EP - 129

JO - Journal of Strategic Marketing

JF - Journal of Strategic Marketing

SN - 0965-254X

IS - 2

ER -