Abstract
When this article was first published, part of the first paragraph was italicized by mistake in the PDF version of the article. Also, the affiliations did contain information about the ESICM sections and groups that were not related to these affiliations. For clarity the acknowledgement section now displays the list of members of ESICM Sections and Groups who contributed to the article. Furthermore, Tables 2 and 4 suffered a typeset error which hinders comprehension. They have now been updated with a clear divide between consensus statements and checklist items. Authors are not responsible of these errors introduced during the publishing process. The original article has been updated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1412-1413 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Intensive Care Medicine |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 16 Jun 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: ESICM consensus-based recommendations for the management of very old patients in intensive care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Citations
- 1 Article
-
ESICM consensus-based recommendations for the management of very old patients in intensive care
Beil, M., Alberto, L., Bourne, R. S., Brummel, N. E., de Groot, B., de Lange, D. W., Elbers, P., Emmelot-Vonk, M., Flaatten, H., Freund, Y., Galazzi, A., Garcia-Martinez, A., Guidet, B., Holmerova, I., Jacobs, J. M., Joynt, G. M., Leaver, S., Leone, M., McNicholas, B. & McWilliams, D. & 12 others, , Feb 2025, In: Intensive Care Medicine. 51, 2, p. 287-301 15 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile16 Link opens in a new tab Citations (Scopus)9 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS