Corporate social disclosures: a user perspective on assurance

R. Wong, A. Millington

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    24 Citations (Scopus)
    87 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate corporate social disclosure (CSD) assurance from a stakeholder perspective within a study which encompasses both stakeholder preferences and demand drivers of CSD assurance. Design/methodology/approach – Stakeholder perceptions of and their demand for CSD assurance are examined through a questionnaire survey. The analysis is based on responses in an empirical study from 147 organisations which are investing, procuring and third-sector stakeholders. Findings – Overall, stakeholder comments suggest an emphasis on the importance of specialist environmental assurors and the role of trust. The demand for assurance is positively related to stakeholders’ assessment of the value of CSD and the use of information from information intermediaries such as responsible investment indices, and negatively related to stakeholder perceptions of CSD representational faithfulness. Research limitations/implications – This paper only draws on data from the UK. Similar research can be explored in a context outside the UK. Practical implications – Better understanding of stakeholder defined determinants of the demand for CSD assurance as well as their perceptions of CSD assurance will inform regulators and enable companies to better discharge accountability towards stakeholders. Originality/value – This is one of the few empirical studies that investigate CSD assurance and one of the first to focus on stakeholder perceptions of, and demand for, CSD assurance within a multiple stakeholder perspective, rather than practitioner or corporate perceptions of CSD assurance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)863-887
    JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
    Volume27
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Assurance
    Disclosure
    Stakeholders
    Empirical study
    Design methodology
    Responsible investment
    Investing
    Accountability
    Intermediaries
    Stakeholder approach
    Multiple stakeholders
    Third sector
    Questionnaire survey

    Bibliographical note

    "This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/428b032d-d234-480d-8e64-d83dedbe1066/1/ . Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited."

    Keywords

    • Stakeholders
    • Reporting
    • Social
    • Environmental
    • Assurance

    Cite this

    Corporate social disclosures: a user perspective on assurance. / Wong, R.; Millington, A.

    In: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2014, p. 863-887.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{cabcb4521a564a459876b00535bfeab3,
    title = "Corporate social disclosures: a user perspective on assurance",
    abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate corporate social disclosure (CSD) assurance from a stakeholder perspective within a study which encompasses both stakeholder preferences and demand drivers of CSD assurance. Design/methodology/approach – Stakeholder perceptions of and their demand for CSD assurance are examined through a questionnaire survey. The analysis is based on responses in an empirical study from 147 organisations which are investing, procuring and third-sector stakeholders. Findings – Overall, stakeholder comments suggest an emphasis on the importance of specialist environmental assurors and the role of trust. The demand for assurance is positively related to stakeholders’ assessment of the value of CSD and the use of information from information intermediaries such as responsible investment indices, and negatively related to stakeholder perceptions of CSD representational faithfulness. Research limitations/implications – This paper only draws on data from the UK. Similar research can be explored in a context outside the UK. Practical implications – Better understanding of stakeholder defined determinants of the demand for CSD assurance as well as their perceptions of CSD assurance will inform regulators and enable companies to better discharge accountability towards stakeholders. Originality/value – This is one of the few empirical studies that investigate CSD assurance and one of the first to focus on stakeholder perceptions of, and demand for, CSD assurance within a multiple stakeholder perspective, rather than practitioner or corporate perceptions of CSD assurance.",
    keywords = "Stakeholders, Reporting, Social, Environmental, Assurance",
    author = "R. Wong and A. Millington",
    note = "{"}This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/428b032d-d234-480d-8e64-d83dedbe1066/1/ . Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.{"}",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1108/AAAJ-06-2013-1389",
    language = "English",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "863--887",
    journal = "Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal",
    issn = "0951-3574",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Corporate social disclosures: a user perspective on assurance

    AU - Wong, R.

    AU - Millington, A.

    N1 - "This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/items/428b032d-d234-480d-8e64-d83dedbe1066/1/ . Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited."

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate corporate social disclosure (CSD) assurance from a stakeholder perspective within a study which encompasses both stakeholder preferences and demand drivers of CSD assurance. Design/methodology/approach – Stakeholder perceptions of and their demand for CSD assurance are examined through a questionnaire survey. The analysis is based on responses in an empirical study from 147 organisations which are investing, procuring and third-sector stakeholders. Findings – Overall, stakeholder comments suggest an emphasis on the importance of specialist environmental assurors and the role of trust. The demand for assurance is positively related to stakeholders’ assessment of the value of CSD and the use of information from information intermediaries such as responsible investment indices, and negatively related to stakeholder perceptions of CSD representational faithfulness. Research limitations/implications – This paper only draws on data from the UK. Similar research can be explored in a context outside the UK. Practical implications – Better understanding of stakeholder defined determinants of the demand for CSD assurance as well as their perceptions of CSD assurance will inform regulators and enable companies to better discharge accountability towards stakeholders. Originality/value – This is one of the few empirical studies that investigate CSD assurance and one of the first to focus on stakeholder perceptions of, and demand for, CSD assurance within a multiple stakeholder perspective, rather than practitioner or corporate perceptions of CSD assurance.

    AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate corporate social disclosure (CSD) assurance from a stakeholder perspective within a study which encompasses both stakeholder preferences and demand drivers of CSD assurance. Design/methodology/approach – Stakeholder perceptions of and their demand for CSD assurance are examined through a questionnaire survey. The analysis is based on responses in an empirical study from 147 organisations which are investing, procuring and third-sector stakeholders. Findings – Overall, stakeholder comments suggest an emphasis on the importance of specialist environmental assurors and the role of trust. The demand for assurance is positively related to stakeholders’ assessment of the value of CSD and the use of information from information intermediaries such as responsible investment indices, and negatively related to stakeholder perceptions of CSD representational faithfulness. Research limitations/implications – This paper only draws on data from the UK. Similar research can be explored in a context outside the UK. Practical implications – Better understanding of stakeholder defined determinants of the demand for CSD assurance as well as their perceptions of CSD assurance will inform regulators and enable companies to better discharge accountability towards stakeholders. Originality/value – This is one of the few empirical studies that investigate CSD assurance and one of the first to focus on stakeholder perceptions of, and demand for, CSD assurance within a multiple stakeholder perspective, rather than practitioner or corporate perceptions of CSD assurance.

    KW - Stakeholders

    KW - Reporting

    KW - Social

    KW - Environmental

    KW - Assurance

    U2 - 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2013-1389

    DO - 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2013-1389

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 863

    EP - 887

    JO - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

    JF - Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

    SN - 0951-3574

    IS - 5

    ER -