Contract cheating & the market in essays

D. Rigby; M. Burton; K. Belcombe; I. Bateman; Abay Mulatu

doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019

Contract cheating & the market in essays

D. Rigby, M. Burton, K. Belcombe, I. Bateman, Abay Mulatu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We conduct the first empirical economic investigation of the decision to cheat by university students. We investigate student demand for essays, using hypothetical discrete choice experiments in conjunction with consequential Holt–Laury gambles to derive subjects’ risk preferences. Students’ stated willingness to participate in the essay market, and their valuation of purchased essays, vary with the characteristics of student and institutional environment. Risk preferring students, those working in a non-native language, and those believing they will attain a lower grade are willing to pay more. Purchase likelihoods and essay valuations decline as the probability of detection and associated penalty increase.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	23-37
Journal	Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Volume	111
Early online date	26 Dec 2014
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019
Publication status	Published - Mar 2015
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives license

Keywords

Cheating
Choice experiment
Mixed logit
Risk preference
Gamble
Asymmetric information

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

1-s2Final published version, 1.02 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Abay Mulatu
- Research Centre for Financial & Corporate Integrity - Associate Professor Academic
Person: Teaching and Research

Cite this

@article{a0c62c816d604643aa1093e059754919,

title = "Contract cheating & the market in essays",

abstract = "We conduct the first empirical economic investigation of the decision to cheat by university students. We investigate student demand for essays, using hypothetical discrete choice experiments in conjunction with consequential Holt–Laury gambles to derive subjects{\textquoteright} risk preferences. Students{\textquoteright} stated willingness to participate in the essay market, and their valuation of purchased essays, vary with the characteristics of student and institutional environment. Risk preferring students, those working in a non-native language, and those believing they will attain a lower grade are willing to pay more. Purchase likelihoods and essay valuations decline as the probability of detection and associated penalty increase. ",

keywords = "Cheating, Choice experiment, Mixed logit, Risk preference, Gamble, Asymmetric information",

author = "D. Rigby and M. Burton and K. Belcombe and I. Bateman and Abay Mulatu",

note = "Under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives license",

year = "2015",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019",

language = "English",

volume = "111",

pages = "23--37",

journal = "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization",

issn = "0167-2681",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contract cheating & the market in essays

AU - Rigby, D.

AU - Burton, M.

AU - Belcombe, K.

AU - Bateman, I.

AU - Mulatu, Abay

N1 - Under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives license

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - We conduct the first empirical economic investigation of the decision to cheat by university students. We investigate student demand for essays, using hypothetical discrete choice experiments in conjunction with consequential Holt–Laury gambles to derive subjects’ risk preferences. Students’ stated willingness to participate in the essay market, and their valuation of purchased essays, vary with the characteristics of student and institutional environment. Risk preferring students, those working in a non-native language, and those believing they will attain a lower grade are willing to pay more. Purchase likelihoods and essay valuations decline as the probability of detection and associated penalty increase.

AB - We conduct the first empirical economic investigation of the decision to cheat by university students. We investigate student demand for essays, using hypothetical discrete choice experiments in conjunction with consequential Holt–Laury gambles to derive subjects’ risk preferences. Students’ stated willingness to participate in the essay market, and their valuation of purchased essays, vary with the characteristics of student and institutional environment. Risk preferring students, those working in a non-native language, and those believing they will attain a lower grade are willing to pay more. Purchase likelihoods and essay valuations decline as the probability of detection and associated penalty increase.

KW - Cheating

KW - Choice experiment

KW - Mixed logit

KW - Risk preference

KW - Gamble

KW - Asymmetric information

U2 - 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019

M3 - Article

SN - 0167-2681

VL - 111

SP - 23

EP - 37

JO - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

JF - Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

ER -

Contract cheating & the market in essays

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Profiles

Abay Mulatu

Cite this