Constructing Conflict and Co-operation: The Rhetoric of Coalition Bargaining

Judi Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The central contention of this article is that coalition bargaining is permeated by the competing imperatives of unity and distinctiveness, and that rhetoric is key to managing these. Drawing on Kenneth Burke’s ‘new rhetoric’, the article distinguishes three forms of identification and division – ideological, instrumental and interpersonal – at work within coalition bargaining. This framework is applied to the negotiations on electoral reform that preceded the formation of the UK coalition government in 2010. The analysis reveals that, through the rhetoric of identification, senior Conservatives and Liberal Democrats
discovered ideological common ground on the equalization of constituency boundaries, together with a shared interest in promising to hold a referendum on AV, and thus succeeded in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on this contentious issue.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-324
Number of pages10
JournalParty Politics
Volume25
Issue number3
Early online date12 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

coalition
rhetoric
referendum
reform

Keywords

  • coalition bargaining
  • Conservative-Liberal
  • Democratic government
  • electoral reform
  • identification
  • rhetoric

Cite this

Constructing Conflict and Co-operation: The Rhetoric of Coalition Bargaining. / Atkins, Judi.

In: Party Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3, 05.2019, p. 315-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c551ffabc55f43a9bd83f3362e9034cb,
title = "Constructing Conflict and Co-operation: The Rhetoric of Coalition Bargaining",
abstract = "The central contention of this article is that coalition bargaining is permeated by the competing imperatives of unity and distinctiveness, and that rhetoric is key to managing these. Drawing on Kenneth Burke’s ‘new rhetoric’, the article distinguishes three forms of identification and division – ideological, instrumental and interpersonal – at work within coalition bargaining. This framework is applied to the negotiations on electoral reform that preceded the formation of the UK coalition government in 2010. The analysis reveals that, through the rhetoric of identification, senior Conservatives and Liberal Democratsdiscovered ideological common ground on the equalization of constituency boundaries, together with a shared interest in promising to hold a referendum on AV, and thus succeeded in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on this contentious issue.",
keywords = "coalition bargaining, Conservative-Liberal, Democratic government, electoral reform, identification, rhetoric",
author = "Judi Atkins",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1354068817713998",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "315--324",
journal = "Party Politics",
issn = "1354-0688",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing Conflict and Co-operation: The Rhetoric of Coalition Bargaining

AU - Atkins, Judi

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - The central contention of this article is that coalition bargaining is permeated by the competing imperatives of unity and distinctiveness, and that rhetoric is key to managing these. Drawing on Kenneth Burke’s ‘new rhetoric’, the article distinguishes three forms of identification and division – ideological, instrumental and interpersonal – at work within coalition bargaining. This framework is applied to the negotiations on electoral reform that preceded the formation of the UK coalition government in 2010. The analysis reveals that, through the rhetoric of identification, senior Conservatives and Liberal Democratsdiscovered ideological common ground on the equalization of constituency boundaries, together with a shared interest in promising to hold a referendum on AV, and thus succeeded in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on this contentious issue.

AB - The central contention of this article is that coalition bargaining is permeated by the competing imperatives of unity and distinctiveness, and that rhetoric is key to managing these. Drawing on Kenneth Burke’s ‘new rhetoric’, the article distinguishes three forms of identification and division – ideological, instrumental and interpersonal – at work within coalition bargaining. This framework is applied to the negotiations on electoral reform that preceded the formation of the UK coalition government in 2010. The analysis reveals that, through the rhetoric of identification, senior Conservatives and Liberal Democratsdiscovered ideological common ground on the equalization of constituency boundaries, together with a shared interest in promising to hold a referendum on AV, and thus succeeded in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement on this contentious issue.

KW - coalition bargaining

KW - Conservative-Liberal

KW - Democratic government

KW - electoral reform

KW - identification

KW - rhetoric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041394158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1354068817713998

DO - 10.1177/1354068817713998

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 315

EP - 324

JO - Party Politics

JF - Party Politics

SN - 1354-0688

IS - 3

ER -