Consequential Reasoning and the UN Security Council Sanctions Ombudsperson

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

This paper investigates the archives and work of the UN Security Council ombudsperson and traces the manifestations and effects of consequential reasoning in the execution of the ombudspersons legal duties. The paper identifies consequentialist considerations in the work of the ombdsperson that have institutional, administrative, and personal dimensions, which pull against the effectiveness and public legitimac of the role.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes
EventQueen Mary University of London-Erasmus School of Law Joint Conference - Rotterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 24 Nov 201624 Nov 2016

Conference

ConferenceQueen Mary University of London-Erasmus School of Law Joint Conference
CountryNetherlands
CityRotterdam
Period24/11/1624/11/16

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consequential Reasoning and the UN Security Council Sanctions Ombudsperson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this