Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education

Lee Jerome; Joel Busher; Megan A. Armstrong; Tufyal Choudhury; Raquel da Silva; Alex Elwick; Giuditta Fontana; Natalie James; James Lewis; Jenny Robson; Hans Svennevig; Paul Thomas

Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education

Lee Jerome, Joel Busher, Megan A. Armstrong, Tufyal Choudhury, Raquel da Silva, Alex Elwick, Giuditta Fontana, Natalie James, James Lewis, Jenny Robson, Hans Svennevig, Paul Thomas

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

This chapter reflects on the key conclusions from across the previous
chapters. First, it discusses how the Prevent Duty has become normalised
in schools, colleges and early years provision, as professionals
incorporated it into existing structures and processes—both in the curriculum
and through safeguarding. Second, it discusses how, whilst some professionals
might have unconsciously reproduced potentially harmful
stereotypes and simplistic assumptions about terrorism and extremism,
others have consciously worked to mitigate the possible negative effects of
the Duty, and have used the curriculum to further develop values education
and opportunities for critical discussion. Third, the chapter reflects on
the implications of the apparent banalisation of Prevent within education,
and how this may or may not intersect with processes of securitisation.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	The Prevent Duty in Education
Subtitle of host publication	Impact, Enactment and Implications
Editors	Joel Busher, Lee Jerome
Place of Publication	Cham
Publisher	Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Chapter	9
Pages	159-170
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-030-45559-0
ISBN (Print)	978-3-030-45558-3
Publication status	Published - 27 Jul 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-45559-0_9Licence: CC BY

Cite this

Jerome, L., Busher, J., Armstrong, M. A., Choudhury, T., da Silva, R., Elwick, A., Fontana, G., James, N., Lewis, J., Robson, J., Svennevig, H., & Thomas, P. (2020). Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education. In J. Busher, & L. Jerome (Eds.), The Prevent Duty in Education : Impact, Enactment and Implications (pp. 159-170). Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-45559-0_9

Conclusion : Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education. / Jerome, Lee; Busher, Joel; Armstrong, Megan A.; Choudhury, Tufyal; da Silva, Raquel; Elwick, Alex; Fontana, Giuditta; James, Natalie; Lewis, James; Robson, Jenny; Svennevig, Hans; Thomas, Paul.

The Prevent Duty in Education : Impact, Enactment and Implications. ed. / Joel Busher; Lee Jerome. Cham : Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2020. p. 159-170.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Jerome, L, Busher, J, Armstrong, MA, Choudhury, T, da Silva, R, Elwick, A, Fontana, G, James, N, Lewis, J, Robson, J, Svennevig, H & Thomas, P 2020, Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education. in J Busher & L Jerome (eds), The Prevent Duty in Education : Impact, Enactment and Implications. Palgrave Pivot, Cham, Cham, pp. 159-170. <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-45559-0_9>

Jerome, Lee ; Busher, Joel ; Armstrong, Megan A. ; Choudhury, Tufyal ; da Silva, Raquel ; Elwick, Alex ; Fontana, Giuditta ; James, Natalie ; Lewis, James ; Robson, Jenny ; Svennevig, Hans ; Thomas, Paul. / Conclusion : Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education. The Prevent Duty in Education : Impact, Enactment and Implications. editor / Joel Busher ; Lee Jerome. Cham : Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2020. pp. 159-170

@inbook{8085008c12ba430cabcb44df3508ad2f,

title = "Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education",

abstract = "This chapter reflects on the key conclusions from across the previouschapters. First, it discusses how the Prevent Duty has become normalisedin schools, colleges and early years provision, as professionalsincorporated it into existing structures and processes—both in the curriculumand through safeguarding. Second, it discusses how, whilst some professionalsmight have unconsciously reproduced potentially harmfulstereotypes and simplistic assumptions about terrorism and extremism,others have consciously worked to mitigate the possible negative effects ofthe Duty, and have used the curriculum to further develop values educationand opportunities for critical discussion. Third, the chapter reflects onthe implications of the apparent banalisation of Prevent within education,and how this may or may not intersect with processes of securitisation.",

author = "Lee Jerome and Joel Busher and Armstrong, {Megan A.} and Tufyal Choudhury and {da Silva}, Raquel and Alex Elwick and Giuditta Fontana and Natalie James and James Lewis and Jenny Robson and Hans Svennevig and Paul Thomas",

year = "2020",

month = jul,

day = "27",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-45558-3",

pages = "159--170",

editor = "Joel Busher and Lee Jerome",

booktitle = "The Prevent Duty in Education",

publisher = "Palgrave Pivot, Cham",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conclusion

T2 - Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education

AU - Jerome, Lee

AU - Busher, Joel

AU - Armstrong, Megan A.

AU - Choudhury, Tufyal

AU - da Silva, Raquel

AU - Elwick, Alex

AU - Fontana, Giuditta

AU - James, Natalie

AU - Lewis, James

AU - Robson, Jenny

AU - Svennevig, Hans

AU - Thomas, Paul

PY - 2020/7/27

Y1 - 2020/7/27

N2 - This chapter reflects on the key conclusions from across the previouschapters. First, it discusses how the Prevent Duty has become normalisedin schools, colleges and early years provision, as professionalsincorporated it into existing structures and processes—both in the curriculumand through safeguarding. Second, it discusses how, whilst some professionalsmight have unconsciously reproduced potentially harmfulstereotypes and simplistic assumptions about terrorism and extremism,others have consciously worked to mitigate the possible negative effects ofthe Duty, and have used the curriculum to further develop values educationand opportunities for critical discussion. Third, the chapter reflects onthe implications of the apparent banalisation of Prevent within education,and how this may or may not intersect with processes of securitisation.

AB - This chapter reflects on the key conclusions from across the previouschapters. First, it discusses how the Prevent Duty has become normalisedin schools, colleges and early years provision, as professionalsincorporated it into existing structures and processes—both in the curriculumand through safeguarding. Second, it discusses how, whilst some professionalsmight have unconsciously reproduced potentially harmfulstereotypes and simplistic assumptions about terrorism and extremism,others have consciously worked to mitigate the possible negative effects ofthe Duty, and have used the curriculum to further develop values educationand opportunities for critical discussion. Third, the chapter reflects onthe implications of the apparent banalisation of Prevent within education,and how this may or may not intersect with processes of securitisation.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-030-45558-3

SP - 159

EP - 170

BT - The Prevent Duty in Education

A2 - Busher, Joel

A2 - Jerome, Lee

PB - Palgrave Pivot, Cham

CY - Cham

ER -

Conclusion: Reflections on the First Five Years of the Prevent Duty in Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Further Education

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this