Conclusion

Robbert Kivits; Sukanlaya Sawang

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_7

Conclusion

Robbert Kivits, Sukanlaya Sawang

College of Business & Law

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

The last chapter had set out an overview of the stakeholders identified in the Adelaide airport stakeholder network. The three main metrics are discussed, salience, frames of reference, and network centrality. The chapter has indicated to a degree of how complex and intricate the data involved is. There is no relation between either one of the main metrics, which presents evidence that the context and environment to the Adelaide stakeholder arena is indeed complex and multifaceted. After reading this case study, one cannot look at the data and pick ‘the most important’ stakeholder, nor ‘the least important’ stakeholder. In fact, the data is so complex that it defies categorization. This implicates that stakeholder engagement within complex and dynamic environments, such as airports, requires a more contingent, and specialized approach, and one which is based on each stakeholder being considered separately. The information compiled using the three pronged approach of the three component stakeholder analysis is for that purpose a rich source of reference that can assist in drafting meaningful and personalized engagement policies.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	The Dynamism of Stakeholder Engagement
Subtitle of host publication	A Case Study of the Aviation Industry
Editors	Robbert Kivits, Sukanlaya Sawang
Publisher	SpringerOpen
Chapter	7
Pages	77-79
Number of pages	3
Edition	1
ISBN (Electronic)	978-3-030-70428-5
ISBN (Print)	978-3-030-70430-8, 978-3-030-70427-8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_7
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 1 Apr 2021

Publication series

Name	Contributions to Management Science
ISSN (Print)	1431-1941
ISSN (Electronic)	2197-716X

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements The research that has been the underpinning of the work presented was carried out with financial support from the Commonwealth of Australia through the Australia Research Council Linkage Grants, No. 0775225, the Airport Metropolis Research Project. Other work from this research has been published in prior papers; ‘Three component stakeholder analysis’ (Kivits 2011) and ‘Aviation planning policy in Australia Identifying frames of reference’ (Kivits and Charles 2015). Great care has been taken to ensure minimal overlap with the research papers, and only where required for the understanding of the story has material been duplicated and referenced.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Business and International Management
Strategy and Management
Management Science and Operations Research
Marketing
Management of Technology and Innovation

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_7

Cite this

@inbook{0cf1496236c6407eb5fdeb98692ea932,

title = "Conclusion",

abstract = "The last chapter had set out an overview of the stakeholders identified in the Adelaide airport stakeholder network. The three main metrics are discussed, salience, frames of reference, and network centrality. The chapter has indicated to a degree of how complex and intricate the data involved is. There is no relation between either one of the main metrics, which presents evidence that the context and environment to the Adelaide stakeholder arena is indeed complex and multifaceted. After reading this case study, one cannot look at the data and pick {\textquoteleft}the most important{\textquoteright} stakeholder, nor {\textquoteleft}the least important{\textquoteright} stakeholder. In fact, the data is so complex that it defies categorization. This implicates that stakeholder engagement within complex and dynamic environments, such as airports, requires a more contingent, and specialized approach, and one which is based on each stakeholder being considered separately. The information compiled using the three pronged approach of the three component stakeholder analysis is for that purpose a rich source of reference that can assist in drafting meaningful and personalized engagement policies.",

author = "Robbert Kivits and Sukanlaya Sawang",

note = "Funding Information: Acknowledgements The research that has been the underpinning of the work presented was carried out with financial support from the Commonwealth of Australia through the Australia Research Council Linkage Grants, No. 0775225, the Airport Metropolis Research Project. Other work from this research has been published in prior papers; {\textquoteleft}Three component stakeholder analysis{\textquoteright} (Kivits 2011) and {\textquoteleft}Aviation planning policy in Australia Identifying frames of reference{\textquoteright} (Kivits and Charles 2015). Great care has been taken to ensure minimal overlap with the research papers, and only where required for the understanding of the story has material been duplicated and referenced. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.",

year = "2021",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_7",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-030-70430-8",

series = "Contributions to Management Science",

publisher = "SpringerOpen",

pages = "77--79",

editor = "Robbert Kivits and Sawang, {Sukanlaya }",

booktitle = "The Dynamism of Stakeholder Engagement",

address = "United Kingdom",

edition = "1",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Conclusion

AU - Kivits, Robbert

AU - Sawang, Sukanlaya

N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgements The research that has been the underpinning of the work presented was carried out with financial support from the Commonwealth of Australia through the Australia Research Council Linkage Grants, No. 0775225, the Airport Metropolis Research Project. Other work from this research has been published in prior papers; ‘Three component stakeholder analysis’ (Kivits 2011) and ‘Aviation planning policy in Australia Identifying frames of reference’ (Kivits and Charles 2015). Great care has been taken to ensure minimal overlap with the research papers, and only where required for the understanding of the story has material been duplicated and referenced. Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

PY - 2021/4/1

Y1 - 2021/4/1

N2 - The last chapter had set out an overview of the stakeholders identified in the Adelaide airport stakeholder network. The three main metrics are discussed, salience, frames of reference, and network centrality. The chapter has indicated to a degree of how complex and intricate the data involved is. There is no relation between either one of the main metrics, which presents evidence that the context and environment to the Adelaide stakeholder arena is indeed complex and multifaceted. After reading this case study, one cannot look at the data and pick ‘the most important’ stakeholder, nor ‘the least important’ stakeholder. In fact, the data is so complex that it defies categorization. This implicates that stakeholder engagement within complex and dynamic environments, such as airports, requires a more contingent, and specialized approach, and one which is based on each stakeholder being considered separately. The information compiled using the three pronged approach of the three component stakeholder analysis is for that purpose a rich source of reference that can assist in drafting meaningful and personalized engagement policies.

AB - The last chapter had set out an overview of the stakeholders identified in the Adelaide airport stakeholder network. The three main metrics are discussed, salience, frames of reference, and network centrality. The chapter has indicated to a degree of how complex and intricate the data involved is. There is no relation between either one of the main metrics, which presents evidence that the context and environment to the Adelaide stakeholder arena is indeed complex and multifaceted. After reading this case study, one cannot look at the data and pick ‘the most important’ stakeholder, nor ‘the least important’ stakeholder. In fact, the data is so complex that it defies categorization. This implicates that stakeholder engagement within complex and dynamic environments, such as airports, requires a more contingent, and specialized approach, and one which is based on each stakeholder being considered separately. The information compiled using the three pronged approach of the three component stakeholder analysis is for that purpose a rich source of reference that can assist in drafting meaningful and personalized engagement policies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103621567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_7

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85103621567

SN - 978-3-030-70430-8

SN - 978-3-030-70427-8

T3 - Contributions to Management Science

SP - 77

EP - 79

BT - The Dynamism of Stakeholder Engagement

A2 - Kivits, Robbert

A2 - Sawang, Sukanlaya

PB - SpringerOpen

ER -

Conclusion

Abstract

Publication series

Bibliographical note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this