Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket

Hector Ulises Levatti, Mauro Innocente, H. Dawn Morgan, John Cherry, Nicholas Lavery, Shahid Mehmood, Ian Cameron, Johann Sienz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The design of critical components for aircrafts, cars or any other kind of machinery today is typically subject to two conflicting objectives, namely the maximisation of strength and the minimisation of weight. The conflicting nature of these two objectives makes it impossible to obtain a design that is optimal for both. The most common approach aiming for a single objective optimisation problem in aerospace is to maintain the weight minimisation as the objective, whilst setting strength requirements as constraints to be satisfied. However, manufacturing methods incorporate additional restrictions for an optimal design to be considered feasible, even when satisfying all constraints in the formulation of the optimisation problem. In this context, Additive Layer Manufacturing adds remarkably higher flexibility to the manufacturability of shape designs when compared with traditional processes. It is fair to note, however, that there are still some restrictions such as the infeasibility of building unsupported layers forming angles smaller than 45 degrees with respect to the underlying one. Nowadays, it is common practice to use a set of software tools to deal with these kinds of
problems, namely Computer Aided Design (CAD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and optimisation packages. The adequate use of these tools results in an increase in efficiency and quality of the final product. In this paper, a case study was undertaken consisting of a
turbine bracket from a General Electric challenge (Figure 5). A computational methodology is used, which consists of a topology optimisation considering an isotropic material at first instance, followed by the manual refinement of the resulting shape taking into account the manufacturability requirements. To this end, we used SolidWorks®2013 for the CAD, Ansys Workbench®14.0 for the FEA, and HyperWorks®11 for the topology optimisation. A future methodology will incorporate the automation of the shape optimisation stage, and perhaps the inclusion of the manufacturability restriction within the optimisation formulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)641-652
Number of pages12
JournalInImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact
Volume7
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Turbines
Shape optimization
Computer aided design
Finite element method
Optimal design
Machinery
Railroad cars
Automation
Aircraft

Cite this

Levatti, H. U., Innocente, M., Morgan, H. D., Cherry, J., Lavery, N., Mehmood, S., ... Sienz, J. (2016). Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket. InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact, 7(2), 641-652.

Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket. / Levatti, Hector Ulises; Innocente, Mauro; Morgan, H. Dawn; Cherry, John; Lavery, Nicholas; Mehmood, Shahid; Cameron, Ian; Sienz, Johann.

In: InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.05.2016, p. 641-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levatti, HU, Innocente, M, Morgan, HD, Cherry, J, Lavery, N, Mehmood, S, Cameron, I & Sienz, J 2016, 'Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket' InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 641-652.
Levatti, Hector Ulises ; Innocente, Mauro ; Morgan, H. Dawn ; Cherry, John ; Lavery, Nicholas ; Mehmood, Shahid ; Cameron, Ian ; Sienz, Johann. / Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket. In: InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 641-652.
@article{536774e3da5241408bacf6d177db8eed,
title = "Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket",
abstract = "The design of critical components for aircrafts, cars or any other kind of machinery today is typically subject to two conflicting objectives, namely the maximisation of strength and the minimisation of weight. The conflicting nature of these two objectives makes it impossible to obtain a design that is optimal for both. The most common approach aiming for a single objective optimisation problem in aerospace is to maintain the weight minimisation as the objective, whilst setting strength requirements as constraints to be satisfied. However, manufacturing methods incorporate additional restrictions for an optimal design to be considered feasible, even when satisfying all constraints in the formulation of the optimisation problem. In this context, Additive Layer Manufacturing adds remarkably higher flexibility to the manufacturability of shape designs when compared with traditional processes. It is fair to note, however, that there are still some restrictions such as the infeasibility of building unsupported layers forming angles smaller than 45 degrees with respect to the underlying one. Nowadays, it is common practice to use a set of software tools to deal with these kinds ofproblems, namely Computer Aided Design (CAD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and optimisation packages. The adequate use of these tools results in an increase in efficiency and quality of the final product. In this paper, a case study was undertaken consisting of aturbine bracket from a General Electric challenge (Figure 5). A computational methodology is used, which consists of a topology optimisation considering an isotropic material at first instance, followed by the manual refinement of the resulting shape taking into account the manufacturability requirements. To this end, we used SolidWorks{\circledR}2013 for the CAD, Ansys Workbench{\circledR}14.0 for the FEA, and HyperWorks{\circledR}11 for the topology optimisation. A future methodology will incorporate the automation of the shape optimisation stage, and perhaps the inclusion of the manufacturability restriction within the optimisation formulation.",
author = "Levatti, {Hector Ulises} and Mauro Innocente and Morgan, {H. Dawn} and John Cherry and Nicholas Lavery and Shahid Mehmood and Ian Cameron and Johann Sienz",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "641--652",
journal = "InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact",
issn = "2051-6002",
publisher = "Future Technology Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computational Methodology for Optimal Design of Additive Layer Manufactured Turbine Bracket

AU - Levatti, Hector Ulises

AU - Innocente, Mauro

AU - Morgan, H. Dawn

AU - Cherry, John

AU - Lavery, Nicholas

AU - Mehmood, Shahid

AU - Cameron, Ian

AU - Sienz, Johann

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - The design of critical components for aircrafts, cars or any other kind of machinery today is typically subject to two conflicting objectives, namely the maximisation of strength and the minimisation of weight. The conflicting nature of these two objectives makes it impossible to obtain a design that is optimal for both. The most common approach aiming for a single objective optimisation problem in aerospace is to maintain the weight minimisation as the objective, whilst setting strength requirements as constraints to be satisfied. However, manufacturing methods incorporate additional restrictions for an optimal design to be considered feasible, even when satisfying all constraints in the formulation of the optimisation problem. In this context, Additive Layer Manufacturing adds remarkably higher flexibility to the manufacturability of shape designs when compared with traditional processes. It is fair to note, however, that there are still some restrictions such as the infeasibility of building unsupported layers forming angles smaller than 45 degrees with respect to the underlying one. Nowadays, it is common practice to use a set of software tools to deal with these kinds ofproblems, namely Computer Aided Design (CAD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and optimisation packages. The adequate use of these tools results in an increase in efficiency and quality of the final product. In this paper, a case study was undertaken consisting of aturbine bracket from a General Electric challenge (Figure 5). A computational methodology is used, which consists of a topology optimisation considering an isotropic material at first instance, followed by the manual refinement of the resulting shape taking into account the manufacturability requirements. To this end, we used SolidWorks®2013 for the CAD, Ansys Workbench®14.0 for the FEA, and HyperWorks®11 for the topology optimisation. A future methodology will incorporate the automation of the shape optimisation stage, and perhaps the inclusion of the manufacturability restriction within the optimisation formulation.

AB - The design of critical components for aircrafts, cars or any other kind of machinery today is typically subject to two conflicting objectives, namely the maximisation of strength and the minimisation of weight. The conflicting nature of these two objectives makes it impossible to obtain a design that is optimal for both. The most common approach aiming for a single objective optimisation problem in aerospace is to maintain the weight minimisation as the objective, whilst setting strength requirements as constraints to be satisfied. However, manufacturing methods incorporate additional restrictions for an optimal design to be considered feasible, even when satisfying all constraints in the formulation of the optimisation problem. In this context, Additive Layer Manufacturing adds remarkably higher flexibility to the manufacturability of shape designs when compared with traditional processes. It is fair to note, however, that there are still some restrictions such as the infeasibility of building unsupported layers forming angles smaller than 45 degrees with respect to the underlying one. Nowadays, it is common practice to use a set of software tools to deal with these kinds ofproblems, namely Computer Aided Design (CAD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and optimisation packages. The adequate use of these tools results in an increase in efficiency and quality of the final product. In this paper, a case study was undertaken consisting of aturbine bracket from a General Electric challenge (Figure 5). A computational methodology is used, which consists of a topology optimisation considering an isotropic material at first instance, followed by the manual refinement of the resulting shape taking into account the manufacturability requirements. To this end, we used SolidWorks®2013 for the CAD, Ansys Workbench®14.0 for the FEA, and HyperWorks®11 for the topology optimisation. A future methodology will incorporate the automation of the shape optimisation stage, and perhaps the inclusion of the manufacturability restriction within the optimisation formulation.

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 641

EP - 652

JO - InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact

JF - InImpact: The Journal of Innovation Impact

SN - 2051-6002

IS - 2

ER -