Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media

  • Benzhong Zhao
  • , Chris MacMinn
  • , B. K. Primkulov
  • , Yu Chen
  • , A. J. Valocchi
  • , J. Zhao
  • , Q. Kang
  • , K. Bruning
  • , J. E. McClure
  • , C. T. Miller
  • , A. Fakhari
  • , D. Bolster
  • , T. Hiller
  • , M. Brinkmann
  • , L. Cueto-Felgueroso
  • , D. A. Cogswell
  • , R. Verma
  • , M. Prodanovic
  • , J. Maes
  • , S. Geiger
  • M. Vassvik, A. Hansen, E. Segre, Ran Holtzman, Yang, Z, C Yuan, B. Chareyre, Ruben Juanes
    • McMaster University
    • University of Oxford
    • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    • ETH Zürich
    • Los Alamos National Laboratory
    • University of North Carolina
    • Virginia Tech
    • University of Notre Dame
    • Leibniz Institute for Applied Geophysics
    • Saarland University
    • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    • Aramco Research Center-Boston
    • University of Texas at Austin
    • Heriot-Watt University
    • Norwegian University of Science and Technology
    • Weizmann Institute of Science Israel
    • Wuhan University
    • Grenoble Institute of Technology

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    111 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number201901619
    Pages (from-to)13799-13806
    Number of pages8
    JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
    Volume116
    Issue number28
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2019

    Keywords

    • Capillarity
    • Pattern formation
    • Porous media
    • Simulation
    • Wettability

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this