Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media

Benzhong Zhao, Chris MacMinn, B. K. Primkulov, Yu Chen, A. J. Valocchi, J. Zhao, Q. Kang, K. Bruning, J. E. McClure, C. T. Miller, A. Fakhari, D. Bolster, T. Hiller, M. Brinkmann, L. Cueto-Felgueroso, D. A. Cogswell, R. Verma, M. Prodanovic, J. Maes, S. Geiger & 8 others M. Vassvik, A. Hansen, E. Segre, Ran Holtzman, Yang, Z, C Yuan, B. Chareyre, Ruben Juanes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.

Original languageEnglish
Article number201901619
Pages (from-to)13799-13806
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume116
Issue number28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

multiphase flow
porous medium
benchmarking
wettability
comparison
geometry
fluid
modeling
experiment

Keywords

  • Capillarity
  • Pattern formation
  • Porous media
  • Simulation
  • Wettability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Zhao, B., MacMinn, C., Primkulov, B. K., Chen, Y., Valocchi, A. J., Zhao, J., ... Juanes, R. (2019). Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(28), 13799-13806. [201901619]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116

Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. / Zhao, Benzhong; MacMinn, Chris; Primkulov, B. K.; Chen, Yu; Valocchi, A. J.; Zhao, J.; Kang, Q.; Bruning, K.; McClure, J. E.; Miller, C. T.; Fakhari, A.; Bolster, D.; Hiller, T.; Brinkmann, M.; Cueto-Felgueroso, L.; Cogswell, D. A.; Verma, R.; Prodanovic, M.; Maes, J.; Geiger, S.; Vassvik, M.; Hansen, A.; Segre, E.; Holtzman, Ran; Yang, Z; Yuan, C; Chareyre, B.; Juanes, Ruben.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 116, No. 28, 201901619, 21.06.2019, p. 13799-13806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhao, B, MacMinn, C, Primkulov, BK, Chen, Y, Valocchi, AJ, Zhao, J, Kang, Q, Bruning, K, McClure, JE, Miller, CT, Fakhari, A, Bolster, D, Hiller, T, Brinkmann, M, Cueto-Felgueroso, L, Cogswell, DA, Verma, R, Prodanovic, M, Maes, J, Geiger, S, Vassvik, M, Hansen, A, Segre, E, Holtzman, R, Yang, Z, Yuan, C, Chareyre, B & Juanes, R 2019, 'Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 116, no. 28, 201901619, pp. 13799-13806. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901619116
Zhao, Benzhong ; MacMinn, Chris ; Primkulov, B. K. ; Chen, Yu ; Valocchi, A. J. ; Zhao, J. ; Kang, Q. ; Bruning, K. ; McClure, J. E. ; Miller, C. T. ; Fakhari, A. ; Bolster, D. ; Hiller, T. ; Brinkmann, M. ; Cueto-Felgueroso, L. ; Cogswell, D. A. ; Verma, R. ; Prodanovic, M. ; Maes, J. ; Geiger, S. ; Vassvik, M. ; Hansen, A. ; Segre, E. ; Holtzman, Ran ; Yang, Z ; Yuan, C ; Chareyre, B. ; Juanes, Ruben. / Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019 ; Vol. 116, No. 28. pp. 13799-13806.
@article{32097de49ac748d58c12efe5cb5d39d2,
title = "Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media",
abstract = "Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.",
keywords = "Capillarity, Pattern formation, Porous media, Simulation, Wettability",
author = "Benzhong Zhao and Chris MacMinn and Primkulov, {B. K.} and Yu Chen and Valocchi, {A. J.} and J. Zhao and Q. Kang and K. Bruning and McClure, {J. E.} and Miller, {C. T.} and A. Fakhari and D. Bolster and T. Hiller and M. Brinkmann and L. Cueto-Felgueroso and Cogswell, {D. A.} and R. Verma and M. Prodanovic and J. Maes and S. Geiger and M. Vassvik and A. Hansen and E. Segre and Ran Holtzman and {Yang, Z} and C Yuan and B. Chareyre and Ruben Juanes",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1901619116",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "13799--13806",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
publisher = "National Academy of Sciences",
number = "28",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehensive comparison of pore-scale models for multiphase flow in porous media

AU - Zhao, Benzhong

AU - MacMinn, Chris

AU - Primkulov, B. K.

AU - Chen, Yu

AU - Valocchi, A. J.

AU - Zhao, J.

AU - Kang, Q.

AU - Bruning, K.

AU - McClure, J. E.

AU - Miller, C. T.

AU - Fakhari, A.

AU - Bolster, D.

AU - Hiller, T.

AU - Brinkmann, M.

AU - Cueto-Felgueroso, L.

AU - Cogswell, D. A.

AU - Verma, R.

AU - Prodanovic, M.

AU - Maes, J.

AU - Geiger, S.

AU - Vassvik, M.

AU - Hansen, A.

AU - Segre, E.

AU - Holtzman, Ran

AU - Yang, Z, null

AU - Yuan, C

AU - Chareyre, B.

AU - Juanes, Ruben

PY - 2019/6/21

Y1 - 2019/6/21

N2 - Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.

AB - Multiphase flows in porous media are important in many natural and industrial processes. Pore-scale models for multiphase flows have seen rapid development in recent years and are becoming increasingly useful as predictive tools in both academic and industrial applications. However, quantitative comparisons between different pore-scale models, and between these models and experimental data, are lacking. Here, we perform an objective comparison of a variety of state-of-the-art pore-scale models, including lattice Boltzmann, stochastic rotation dynamics, volume-of-fluid, level-set, phase-field, and pore-network models. As the basis for this comparison, we use a dataset from recent microfluidic experiments with precisely controlled pore geometry and wettability conditions, which offers an unprecedented benchmarking opportunity. We compare the results of the 14 participating teams both qualitatively and quantitatively using several standard metrics, such as fractal dimension, finger width, and displacement efficiency. We find that no single method excels across all conditions and that thin films and corner flow present substantial modeling and computational challenges.

KW - Capillarity

KW - Pattern formation

KW - Porous media

KW - Simulation

KW - Wettability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068539209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1901619116

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1901619116

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 13799

EP - 13806

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 28

M1 - 201901619

ER -