Comparisons Across Higher Education Contexts: Findings from Collaboratively Adapting an Interfaith Diversity Study

Renee Bowling, B. Ashley Staples, Matthew Mayhew, Alyssa Rockenbach, Mathew Guest, Kristin Aune, Lucy Peacock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Understanding campus climates for interfaith learning and development in higher education supports universities in achieving their missions of producing global leaders and ensuring equitable access to and experiences of campus life for students of diverse religious, spiritual, and nonreligious worldviews. The Interfaith Diversity Experiences and Attitudes Longitudinal Survey (IDEALS) was a mixed-method study designed to explore these issues in the United States; recently, U.K. researchers collaborated with U.S. principal investigators to collaboratively adapt IDEALS to the U.K. higher education environment. First, using the interfaith learning and development framework as a guide, the authors outline what aspects of the national and institutional contexts the adaptation process considered and how it produced the context-specific data. Second, the relational contexts for interfaith learning were explored using a multiple case study approach, which resulted in cross-context assertions about how students in both countries perceived their campus climates, engaged across worldview difference, and encountered insensitivity about worldviews during their university experience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-Press)
JournalComparative Education Review
Volume(In-Press)
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 26 Sept 2025

Funding

FundersFunder number
Porticus UK

    Keywords

    • US
    • UK
    • International
    • Higher Education
    • Worldview
    • Religion
    • Spirituality
    • Diversity

    Themes

    • Peace and Conflict
    • Faith and Peaceful Relations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparisons Across Higher Education Contexts: Findings from Collaboratively Adapting an Interfaith Diversity Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this