Comparison of vacuum glazing thermal performance predicted using two-and three-dimensional models and their experimental validation

Yueping Fang, Trevor Hyde, Neil Hewitt, Philip Eames, Brian Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract


Thermal performance of vacuum glazing predicted by using two-dimensional (2-D) finite element and three-dimensional (3-D) finite volume models are presented. In the 2-D model, the vacuum space, including the pillar arrays, was represented by a material whose effective thermal conductivity was determined from the specified vacuum space width, the heat conduction through the pillar array and the calculated radiation heat transfer between the two interior glass surfaces within the vacuum gap. In the 3-D model, the support pillar array was incorporated and modelled within the glazing unit directly. The predicted difference in overall heat transfer coefficients between the two models for the vacuum window simulated was less than 3%. A guarded hot box calorimeter was used to determine the experimental thermal performance of vacuum glazing. The experimentally determined overall heat transfer coefficient and temperature profiles along the central line of the vacuum glazing are in very good agreement with the predictions made using the 2-D and 3-D models.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1492-1498
Number of pages7
JournalSolar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Volume93
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Vacuum
Heat transfer coefficients
Heat radiation
Hot Temperature
Calorimeters
Heat conduction
Thermal conductivity
Glass
Temperature

Keywords

  • Thermal performance
  • Finite element model
  • Finite volume model
  • Vacuum glazing

Cite this

Comparison of vacuum glazing thermal performance predicted using two-and three-dimensional models and their experimental validation. / Fang, Yueping; Hyde, Trevor; Hewitt, Neil; Eames, Philip; Norton, Brian .

In: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 93, No. 9, 09.2009, p. 1492-1498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23cc543676ea4aeb93162d2a446e006d,
title = "Comparison of vacuum glazing thermal performance predicted using two-and three-dimensional models and their experimental validation",
abstract = "Thermal performance of vacuum glazing predicted by using two-dimensional (2-D) finite element and three-dimensional (3-D) finite volume models are presented. In the 2-D model, the vacuum space, including the pillar arrays, was represented by a material whose effective thermal conductivity was determined from the specified vacuum space width, the heat conduction through the pillar array and the calculated radiation heat transfer between the two interior glass surfaces within the vacuum gap. In the 3-D model, the support pillar array was incorporated and modelled within the glazing unit directly. The predicted difference in overall heat transfer coefficients between the two models for the vacuum window simulated was less than 3{\%}. A guarded hot box calorimeter was used to determine the experimental thermal performance of vacuum glazing. The experimentally determined overall heat transfer coefficient and temperature profiles along the central line of the vacuum glazing are in very good agreement with the predictions made using the 2-D and 3-D models.",
keywords = "Thermal performance, Finite element model, Finite volume model, Vacuum glazing",
author = "Yueping Fang and Trevor Hyde and Neil Hewitt and Philip Eames and Brian Norton",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.025",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "1492--1498",
journal = "Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells",
issn = "0927-0248",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of vacuum glazing thermal performance predicted using two-and three-dimensional models and their experimental validation

AU - Fang, Yueping

AU - Hyde, Trevor

AU - Hewitt, Neil

AU - Eames, Philip

AU - Norton, Brian

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Thermal performance of vacuum glazing predicted by using two-dimensional (2-D) finite element and three-dimensional (3-D) finite volume models are presented. In the 2-D model, the vacuum space, including the pillar arrays, was represented by a material whose effective thermal conductivity was determined from the specified vacuum space width, the heat conduction through the pillar array and the calculated radiation heat transfer between the two interior glass surfaces within the vacuum gap. In the 3-D model, the support pillar array was incorporated and modelled within the glazing unit directly. The predicted difference in overall heat transfer coefficients between the two models for the vacuum window simulated was less than 3%. A guarded hot box calorimeter was used to determine the experimental thermal performance of vacuum glazing. The experimentally determined overall heat transfer coefficient and temperature profiles along the central line of the vacuum glazing are in very good agreement with the predictions made using the 2-D and 3-D models.

AB - Thermal performance of vacuum glazing predicted by using two-dimensional (2-D) finite element and three-dimensional (3-D) finite volume models are presented. In the 2-D model, the vacuum space, including the pillar arrays, was represented by a material whose effective thermal conductivity was determined from the specified vacuum space width, the heat conduction through the pillar array and the calculated radiation heat transfer between the two interior glass surfaces within the vacuum gap. In the 3-D model, the support pillar array was incorporated and modelled within the glazing unit directly. The predicted difference in overall heat transfer coefficients between the two models for the vacuum window simulated was less than 3%. A guarded hot box calorimeter was used to determine the experimental thermal performance of vacuum glazing. The experimentally determined overall heat transfer coefficient and temperature profiles along the central line of the vacuum glazing are in very good agreement with the predictions made using the 2-D and 3-D models.

KW - Thermal performance

KW - Finite element model

KW - Finite volume model

KW - Vacuum glazing

U2 - 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.025

DO - 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.03.025

M3 - Article

VL - 93

SP - 1492

EP - 1498

JO - Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

JF - Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells

SN - 0927-0248

IS - 9

ER -