Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines

P. L. Delafin, T. Nishino, A. Kolios, L. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A Double Multiple Streamtube model, a free-wake vortex model (both widely used for vertical axis wind turbine design) and RANS CFD simulations are used in this work to predict the performance of the 17 m Vertical Axis Wind Turbine, field tested by Sandia National Laboratories. The three-dimensional, full scale calculations are compared with the experiments in terms of power coefficient, power and instantaneous turbine torque to assess the validity of each model. Additionally, the two aerodynamic models and RANS CFD are compared to each other in terms of thrust and lateral force. The two models and CFD agree well with the experiments at the turbine optimal tip speed ratio. However, away from the optimal tip speed ratio, the streamtube model significantly deviates from the experimental data and from the other numerical models. RANS CFD gives a good agreement with the experiments, slightly underestimating the power coefficient at every tip speed ratio tested. The vortex model proves to be a useful tool with a better accuracy than the streamtube model and a much lower computational cost compared to RANS CFD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)564-575
Number of pages12
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume109
Early online date21 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wind turbines
Aerodynamics
Computational fluid dynamics
Vortex flow
Turbines
Experiments
Numerical models
Torque
Costs

Keywords

  • 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics
  • Darrieus turbine
  • Double multiple streamtube
  • Free-wake vortex
  • Instantaneous torque

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines. / Delafin, P. L.; Nishino, T.; Kolios, A.; Wang, L.

In: Renewable Energy, Vol. 109, 08.2017, p. 564-575.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1952410f9bc84448ab81d65d7ba4515b,
title = "Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines",
abstract = "A Double Multiple Streamtube model, a free-wake vortex model (both widely used for vertical axis wind turbine design) and RANS CFD simulations are used in this work to predict the performance of the 17 m Vertical Axis Wind Turbine, field tested by Sandia National Laboratories. The three-dimensional, full scale calculations are compared with the experiments in terms of power coefficient, power and instantaneous turbine torque to assess the validity of each model. Additionally, the two aerodynamic models and RANS CFD are compared to each other in terms of thrust and lateral force. The two models and CFD agree well with the experiments at the turbine optimal tip speed ratio. However, away from the optimal tip speed ratio, the streamtube model significantly deviates from the experimental data and from the other numerical models. RANS CFD gives a good agreement with the experiments, slightly underestimating the power coefficient at every tip speed ratio tested. The vortex model proves to be a useful tool with a better accuracy than the streamtube model and a much lower computational cost compared to RANS CFD.",
keywords = "3D Computational Fluid Dynamics, Darrieus turbine, Double multiple streamtube, Free-wake vortex, Instantaneous torque",
author = "Delafin, {P. L.} and T. Nishino and A. Kolios and L. Wang",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.065",
language = "English",
volume = "109",
pages = "564--575",
journal = "Renewable Energy",
issn = "0960-1481",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of low-order aerodynamic models and RANS CFD for full scale 3D vertical axis wind turbines

AU - Delafin, P. L.

AU - Nishino, T.

AU - Kolios, A.

AU - Wang, L.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - A Double Multiple Streamtube model, a free-wake vortex model (both widely used for vertical axis wind turbine design) and RANS CFD simulations are used in this work to predict the performance of the 17 m Vertical Axis Wind Turbine, field tested by Sandia National Laboratories. The three-dimensional, full scale calculations are compared with the experiments in terms of power coefficient, power and instantaneous turbine torque to assess the validity of each model. Additionally, the two aerodynamic models and RANS CFD are compared to each other in terms of thrust and lateral force. The two models and CFD agree well with the experiments at the turbine optimal tip speed ratio. However, away from the optimal tip speed ratio, the streamtube model significantly deviates from the experimental data and from the other numerical models. RANS CFD gives a good agreement with the experiments, slightly underestimating the power coefficient at every tip speed ratio tested. The vortex model proves to be a useful tool with a better accuracy than the streamtube model and a much lower computational cost compared to RANS CFD.

AB - A Double Multiple Streamtube model, a free-wake vortex model (both widely used for vertical axis wind turbine design) and RANS CFD simulations are used in this work to predict the performance of the 17 m Vertical Axis Wind Turbine, field tested by Sandia National Laboratories. The three-dimensional, full scale calculations are compared with the experiments in terms of power coefficient, power and instantaneous turbine torque to assess the validity of each model. Additionally, the two aerodynamic models and RANS CFD are compared to each other in terms of thrust and lateral force. The two models and CFD agree well with the experiments at the turbine optimal tip speed ratio. However, away from the optimal tip speed ratio, the streamtube model significantly deviates from the experimental data and from the other numerical models. RANS CFD gives a good agreement with the experiments, slightly underestimating the power coefficient at every tip speed ratio tested. The vortex model proves to be a useful tool with a better accuracy than the streamtube model and a much lower computational cost compared to RANS CFD.

KW - 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics

KW - Darrieus turbine

KW - Double multiple streamtube

KW - Free-wake vortex

KW - Instantaneous torque

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.065

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.065

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 564

EP - 575

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

SN - 0960-1481

ER -