Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an Urban drainage system

Matteo Rubinato, James Shucksmith, Adrian J. Saul, Will Shepherd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Urban drainage systems are frequently analysed using hydraulic modelling software packages such as InfoWorks CS or MIKE-Urban. The use of such modelling tools allows the evaluation of sewer capacity and the likelihood and impact of pluvial flood events. Models can also be used to plan major investments such as increasing storage capacity or the implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems. In spite of their widespread use, when applied to flooding the results of hydraulic models are rarely compared with field or laboratory (i.e. physical modelling) data. This is largely due to the time and expense required to collect reliable empirical data sets. This paper describes a laboratory facility which will enable an urban flood model to be verified and generic approaches to be built. Results are presented from the first phase of testing, which compares the sub-surface hydraulic performance of a physical scale model of a sewer network in Yorkshire, UK, with downscaled results from a calibrated 1D InfoWorks hydraulic model of the site. A variety of real rainfall events measured in the catchment over a period of 15 months (April 2008-June 2009) have been both hydraulically modelled and reproduced in the physical model. In most cases a comparison of flow hydrographs generated in both hydraulic and physical models shows good agreement in terms of velocities which pass through the system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)372-379
Number of pages8
JournalWater Science and Technology
Volume68
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

urban drainage
Drainage
Hydraulics
hydraulics
Hydraulic models
Sewers
modeling
Software packages
sewer network
Catchments
Rain
Data structures
comparison
drainage system
hydrograph
flooding
Testing
catchment
software
rainfall

Keywords

  • Hydraulic modelling
  • Physical scale modelling
  • Urban drainage
  • Urban flood risk

Cite this

Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an Urban drainage system. / Rubinato, Matteo; Shucksmith, James; Saul, Adrian J.; Shepherd, Will.

In: Water Science and Technology, Vol. 68, No. 2, 01.07.2013, p. 372-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rubinato, Matteo ; Shucksmith, James ; Saul, Adrian J. ; Shepherd, Will. / Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an Urban drainage system. In: Water Science and Technology. 2013 ; Vol. 68, No. 2. pp. 372-379.
@article{66b61d5a272f436280ef11c572bb5786,
title = "Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an Urban drainage system",
abstract = "Urban drainage systems are frequently analysed using hydraulic modelling software packages such as InfoWorks CS or MIKE-Urban. The use of such modelling tools allows the evaluation of sewer capacity and the likelihood and impact of pluvial flood events. Models can also be used to plan major investments such as increasing storage capacity or the implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems. In spite of their widespread use, when applied to flooding the results of hydraulic models are rarely compared with field or laboratory (i.e. physical modelling) data. This is largely due to the time and expense required to collect reliable empirical data sets. This paper describes a laboratory facility which will enable an urban flood model to be verified and generic approaches to be built. Results are presented from the first phase of testing, which compares the sub-surface hydraulic performance of a physical scale model of a sewer network in Yorkshire, UK, with downscaled results from a calibrated 1D InfoWorks hydraulic model of the site. A variety of real rainfall events measured in the catchment over a period of 15 months (April 2008-June 2009) have been both hydraulically modelled and reproduced in the physical model. In most cases a comparison of flow hydrographs generated in both hydraulic and physical models shows good agreement in terms of velocities which pass through the system.",
keywords = "Hydraulic modelling, Physical scale modelling, Urban drainage, Urban flood risk",
author = "Matteo Rubinato and James Shucksmith and Saul, {Adrian J.} and Will Shepherd",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2166/wst.2013.254",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "372--379",
journal = "Water Science and Technology",
issn = "0273-1223",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an Urban drainage system

AU - Rubinato, Matteo

AU - Shucksmith, James

AU - Saul, Adrian J.

AU - Shepherd, Will

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Urban drainage systems are frequently analysed using hydraulic modelling software packages such as InfoWorks CS or MIKE-Urban. The use of such modelling tools allows the evaluation of sewer capacity and the likelihood and impact of pluvial flood events. Models can also be used to plan major investments such as increasing storage capacity or the implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems. In spite of their widespread use, when applied to flooding the results of hydraulic models are rarely compared with field or laboratory (i.e. physical modelling) data. This is largely due to the time and expense required to collect reliable empirical data sets. This paper describes a laboratory facility which will enable an urban flood model to be verified and generic approaches to be built. Results are presented from the first phase of testing, which compares the sub-surface hydraulic performance of a physical scale model of a sewer network in Yorkshire, UK, with downscaled results from a calibrated 1D InfoWorks hydraulic model of the site. A variety of real rainfall events measured in the catchment over a period of 15 months (April 2008-June 2009) have been both hydraulically modelled and reproduced in the physical model. In most cases a comparison of flow hydrographs generated in both hydraulic and physical models shows good agreement in terms of velocities which pass through the system.

AB - Urban drainage systems are frequently analysed using hydraulic modelling software packages such as InfoWorks CS or MIKE-Urban. The use of such modelling tools allows the evaluation of sewer capacity and the likelihood and impact of pluvial flood events. Models can also be used to plan major investments such as increasing storage capacity or the implementation of sustainable urban drainage systems. In spite of their widespread use, when applied to flooding the results of hydraulic models are rarely compared with field or laboratory (i.e. physical modelling) data. This is largely due to the time and expense required to collect reliable empirical data sets. This paper describes a laboratory facility which will enable an urban flood model to be verified and generic approaches to be built. Results are presented from the first phase of testing, which compares the sub-surface hydraulic performance of a physical scale model of a sewer network in Yorkshire, UK, with downscaled results from a calibrated 1D InfoWorks hydraulic model of the site. A variety of real rainfall events measured in the catchment over a period of 15 months (April 2008-June 2009) have been both hydraulically modelled and reproduced in the physical model. In most cases a comparison of flow hydrographs generated in both hydraulic and physical models shows good agreement in terms of velocities which pass through the system.

KW - Hydraulic modelling

KW - Physical scale modelling

KW - Urban drainage

KW - Urban flood risk

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/comparison-between-infoworks-hydraulic-results-physical-model-urban-drainage-system

U2 - 10.2166/wst.2013.254

DO - 10.2166/wst.2013.254

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 372

EP - 379

JO - Water Science and Technology

JF - Water Science and Technology

SN - 0273-1223

IS - 2

ER -