Comparative Neurological and Behavioral Assessment of Central and Peripheral Stimulation Technologies for Induced Pain and Cognitive Tasks

  • Muhammad Danish Mujib
  • , Ahmad Zahid Rao
  • , Muhammad Abul Hasan
  • , Ayesha Ikhlaq
  • , Hira Shahid
  • , Nargis Bano
  • , Muhammad Usman Mustafa
  • , Faisal Mukhtar
  • , Mehrun Nisa
  • , Saad Ahmed Qazi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)
    33 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Pain is a multifaceted, multisystem disorder that adversely affects neuro-psychological processes. This study compares the effectiveness of central stimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation—tDCS over F3/F4) and peripheral stimulation (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation—TENS over the median nerve) in pain inhibition during a cognitive task in healthy volunteers and to observe potential neuro-cognitive improvements. Eighty healthy participants underwent a comprehensive experimental protocol, including cognitive assessments, the Cold Pressor Test (CPT) for pain induction, and tDCS/TENS administration. EEG recordings were conducted pre- and post-intervention across all conditions. The protocol for this study was categorized into four groups: G1 (control), G2 (TENS), G3 (anodal-tDCS), and G4 (cathodal-tDCS). Paired t-tests (p < 0.05) were conducted to compare Pre-Stage, Post-Stage, and neuromodulation conditions, with t-values providing insights into effect magnitudes. The result showed a reduction in pain intensity with TENS (p = 0.002, t-value = −5.34) and cathodal-tDCS (p = 0.023, t-value = −5.08) and increased pain tolerance with TENS (p = 0.009, t-value = 4.98) and cathodal-tDCS (p = 0.001, t-value = 5.78). Anodal-tDCS (p = 0.041, t-value = 4.86) improved cognitive performance. The EEG analysis revealed distinct neural oscillatory patterns across the groups. Specifically, G2 and G4 showed delta-power reductions, while G3 observed an increase. Moreover, G2 exhibited increased theta-power in the occipital region during CPT and Post-Stages. In the alpha-band, G2, G3, and G4 had reductions Post-Stage, while G1 and G3 increased. Additionally, beta-power increased in the frontal region for G2 and G3, contrasting with a reduction in G4. Furthermore, gamma-power globally increased during CPT1, with G1, G2, and G3 showing reductions Post-Stage, while G4 displayed a global decrease. The findings confirm the efficacy of TENS and tDCS as possible non-drug therapeutic alternatives for cognition with alleviation from pain.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number1269
    Number of pages18
    JournalBiomedicines
    Volume12
    Issue number6
    Early online date6 Jun 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

    Bibliographical note

    © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

    Keywords

    • Stroop task
    • cognition
    • data analysis
    • feature extraction
    • pain
    • physiology
    • signal transduction
    • transcranial direct current stimulation
    • transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
    • Medicine (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Neurological and Behavioral Assessment of Central and Peripheral Stimulation Technologies for Induced Pain and Cognitive Tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this