Comparative analysis of political systems and ethnic mobilization: Assimilation versus exclusion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The success of minority nationalisms and their claim to autonomy is primarily dependent on the popular support they receive from their constituencies. Aspirations of minority groups demanding self-rule are also accepted as democratic because of this popular consent. The unsuccessful autonomy referendums in both Puerto Rico and Corsica, however, deviated from this trend leaving questions behind about where and when autonomy is likely to be a democratic and realistic solution. The article elaborates on five variables explaining popular support for ethnonationalism and questions their reliability across the cases of Quebec, Flanders and Western Thrace. Experimenting with the most different systems design (the Mill’s method of agreement), this article concludes that minority nationalism is stronger in political systems of ethnic differentiation than assimilation. The article also verifies this in the contrasting cases of Corsica and Puerto Rico where the nationalist factions failed to mobilize their ethnic constituency because of their political culture being divided by the political systems of integration and assimilation.

Publisher Statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)557-576
Number of pages20
JournalComparative European Politics
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date30 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

ethnic mobilization
assimilation
political system
exclusion
Puerto Rico
autonomy
minority
faction
referendum
political culture
nationalism
ethnicity
trend
Group

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7

Keywords

  • autonomy referendums
  • ethnic mobilization
  • political systems
  • assimilation
  • exclusion

Cite this

Comparative analysis of political systems and ethnic mobilization : Assimilation versus exclusion. / Kuzu, Durukan.

In: Comparative European Politics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 06.2017, p. 557-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee020791e41344fc8a36b8aa23ca3720,
title = "Comparative analysis of political systems and ethnic mobilization: Assimilation versus exclusion",
abstract = "The success of minority nationalisms and their claim to autonomy is primarily dependent on the popular support they receive from their constituencies. Aspirations of minority groups demanding self-rule are also accepted as democratic because of this popular consent. The unsuccessful autonomy referendums in both Puerto Rico and Corsica, however, deviated from this trend leaving questions behind about where and when autonomy is likely to be a democratic and realistic solution. The article elaborates on five variables explaining popular support for ethnonationalism and questions their reliability across the cases of Quebec, Flanders and Western Thrace. Experimenting with the most different systems design (the Mill’s method of agreement), this article concludes that minority nationalism is stronger in political systems of ethnic differentiation than assimilation. The article also verifies this in the contrasting cases of Corsica and Puerto Rico where the nationalist factions failed to mobilize their ethnic constituency because of their political culture being divided by the political systems of integration and assimilation.Publisher Statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7",
keywords = "autonomy referendums, ethnic mobilization, political systems, assimilation, exclusion",
author = "Durukan Kuzu",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "557--576",
journal = "Comparative European Politics",
issn = "1472-4790",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of political systems and ethnic mobilization

T2 - Assimilation versus exclusion

AU - Kuzu, Durukan

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - The success of minority nationalisms and their claim to autonomy is primarily dependent on the popular support they receive from their constituencies. Aspirations of minority groups demanding self-rule are also accepted as democratic because of this popular consent. The unsuccessful autonomy referendums in both Puerto Rico and Corsica, however, deviated from this trend leaving questions behind about where and when autonomy is likely to be a democratic and realistic solution. The article elaborates on five variables explaining popular support for ethnonationalism and questions their reliability across the cases of Quebec, Flanders and Western Thrace. Experimenting with the most different systems design (the Mill’s method of agreement), this article concludes that minority nationalism is stronger in political systems of ethnic differentiation than assimilation. The article also verifies this in the contrasting cases of Corsica and Puerto Rico where the nationalist factions failed to mobilize their ethnic constituency because of their political culture being divided by the political systems of integration and assimilation.Publisher Statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7

AB - The success of minority nationalisms and their claim to autonomy is primarily dependent on the popular support they receive from their constituencies. Aspirations of minority groups demanding self-rule are also accepted as democratic because of this popular consent. The unsuccessful autonomy referendums in both Puerto Rico and Corsica, however, deviated from this trend leaving questions behind about where and when autonomy is likely to be a democratic and realistic solution. The article elaborates on five variables explaining popular support for ethnonationalism and questions their reliability across the cases of Quebec, Flanders and Western Thrace. Experimenting with the most different systems design (the Mill’s method of agreement), this article concludes that minority nationalism is stronger in political systems of ethnic differentiation than assimilation. The article also verifies this in the contrasting cases of Corsica and Puerto Rico where the nationalist factions failed to mobilize their ethnic constituency because of their political culture being divided by the political systems of integration and assimilation.Publisher Statement: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7

KW - autonomy referendums

KW - ethnic mobilization

KW - political systems

KW - assimilation

KW - exclusion

U2 - 10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7

DO - 10.1057/s41295-016-0004-7

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 557

EP - 576

JO - Comparative European Politics

JF - Comparative European Politics

SN - 1472-4790

IS - 4

ER -