Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine

Ritchie Daniel, Hongming Xu, Chongming Wang, Dave Richardson, Shijin Shuai

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dual-injection strategies in spark-ignition (SI) engines allow the in-cylinder blending of two different fuels at any blend ratio, when simultaneously combining port fuel injection (PFI) and direct-injection (DI). This offers increased flexibility and the potential to optimize the combustion process depending on the engine requirement and fuel availability. Until now, little or no research evidence exists on the experimental comparison of dual-injection to DI in the combustion of gasoline-biofuel blends. Therefore, in this work the authors evaluate this comparison using a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). The differences in performance are examined using D25 (25% DMF in gasoline, by volume) in a single cylinder SI research engine operating at 1500. rpm and varying load (3.5-8.5. bar IMEP). All tests were carried out at stoichiometry (λ= 1) using the cross-over theory of the carbon monoxide and oxygen emissions concentrations. The current results are promising for dual-injection. The improved mixture preparation compared to DI results in lower combustion durations and higher in-cylinder pressures. This gives rise to higher indicated thermal efficiencies and lower fuel consumption rates compared to the same blend (D25) in DI (up to 4% and 3.2%, respectively). More significantly, the lower fuel consumption rate with dual-injection (on a volumetric basis), is up to 1.2% lower than with gasoline in homogenous DI (GDI) up to 8. bar IMEP, despite the use of a lower energy density biofuel. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationApplied Energy
PublisherElsevier
Pages59-68
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9781498703093
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Publication series

NameApplied Energy
Volume98

Fingerprint

Injections
Gasoline
Biofuels
2,5-dimethylfuran
Carbon Monoxide
Research
Hot Temperature
Oxygen
Pressure

Keywords

  • 2,5-Dimethylfuran
  • Biofuel
  • Cross-over theory
  • DMF
  • Dual-injection

Cite this

Daniel, R., Xu, H., Wang, C., Richardson, D., & Shuai, S. (2012). Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine. In Applied Energy (pp. 59-68). (Applied Energy; Vol. 98). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.073

Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine. / Daniel, Ritchie; Xu, Hongming; Wang, Chongming; Richardson, Dave; Shuai, Shijin.

Applied Energy. Elsevier, 2012. p. 59-68 (Applied Energy; Vol. 98).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Daniel, R, Xu, H, Wang, C, Richardson, D & Shuai, S 2012, Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine. in Applied Energy. Applied Energy, vol. 98, Elsevier, pp. 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.073
Daniel, Ritchie ; Xu, Hongming ; Wang, Chongming ; Richardson, Dave ; Shuai, Shijin. / Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine. Applied Energy. Elsevier, 2012. pp. 59-68 (Applied Energy).
@inbook{81a9e56cd75b412782e812c88725a4ad,
title = "Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine",
abstract = "Dual-injection strategies in spark-ignition (SI) engines allow the in-cylinder blending of two different fuels at any blend ratio, when simultaneously combining port fuel injection (PFI) and direct-injection (DI). This offers increased flexibility and the potential to optimize the combustion process depending on the engine requirement and fuel availability. Until now, little or no research evidence exists on the experimental comparison of dual-injection to DI in the combustion of gasoline-biofuel blends. Therefore, in this work the authors evaluate this comparison using a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). The differences in performance are examined using D25 (25{\%} DMF in gasoline, by volume) in a single cylinder SI research engine operating at 1500. rpm and varying load (3.5-8.5. bar IMEP). All tests were carried out at stoichiometry (λ= 1) using the cross-over theory of the carbon monoxide and oxygen emissions concentrations. The current results are promising for dual-injection. The improved mixture preparation compared to DI results in lower combustion durations and higher in-cylinder pressures. This gives rise to higher indicated thermal efficiencies and lower fuel consumption rates compared to the same blend (D25) in DI (up to 4{\%} and 3.2{\%}, respectively). More significantly, the lower fuel consumption rate with dual-injection (on a volumetric basis), is up to 1.2{\%} lower than with gasoline in homogenous DI (GDI) up to 8. bar IMEP, despite the use of a lower energy density biofuel. {\circledC} 2012 Elsevier Ltd.",
keywords = "2,5-Dimethylfuran, Biofuel, Cross-over theory, DMF, Dual-injection",
author = "Ritchie Daniel and Hongming Xu and Chongming Wang and Dave Richardson and Shijin Shuai",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.073",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781498703093",
series = "Applied Energy",
publisher = "Elsevier",
pages = "59--68",
booktitle = "Applied Energy",
address = "Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Combustion performance of 2,5-dimethylfuran blends using dual-injection compared to direct-injection in a SI engine

AU - Daniel, Ritchie

AU - Xu, Hongming

AU - Wang, Chongming

AU - Richardson, Dave

AU - Shuai, Shijin

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Dual-injection strategies in spark-ignition (SI) engines allow the in-cylinder blending of two different fuels at any blend ratio, when simultaneously combining port fuel injection (PFI) and direct-injection (DI). This offers increased flexibility and the potential to optimize the combustion process depending on the engine requirement and fuel availability. Until now, little or no research evidence exists on the experimental comparison of dual-injection to DI in the combustion of gasoline-biofuel blends. Therefore, in this work the authors evaluate this comparison using a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). The differences in performance are examined using D25 (25% DMF in gasoline, by volume) in a single cylinder SI research engine operating at 1500. rpm and varying load (3.5-8.5. bar IMEP). All tests were carried out at stoichiometry (λ= 1) using the cross-over theory of the carbon monoxide and oxygen emissions concentrations. The current results are promising for dual-injection. The improved mixture preparation compared to DI results in lower combustion durations and higher in-cylinder pressures. This gives rise to higher indicated thermal efficiencies and lower fuel consumption rates compared to the same blend (D25) in DI (up to 4% and 3.2%, respectively). More significantly, the lower fuel consumption rate with dual-injection (on a volumetric basis), is up to 1.2% lower than with gasoline in homogenous DI (GDI) up to 8. bar IMEP, despite the use of a lower energy density biofuel. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - Dual-injection strategies in spark-ignition (SI) engines allow the in-cylinder blending of two different fuels at any blend ratio, when simultaneously combining port fuel injection (PFI) and direct-injection (DI). This offers increased flexibility and the potential to optimize the combustion process depending on the engine requirement and fuel availability. Until now, little or no research evidence exists on the experimental comparison of dual-injection to DI in the combustion of gasoline-biofuel blends. Therefore, in this work the authors evaluate this comparison using a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). The differences in performance are examined using D25 (25% DMF in gasoline, by volume) in a single cylinder SI research engine operating at 1500. rpm and varying load (3.5-8.5. bar IMEP). All tests were carried out at stoichiometry (λ= 1) using the cross-over theory of the carbon monoxide and oxygen emissions concentrations. The current results are promising for dual-injection. The improved mixture preparation compared to DI results in lower combustion durations and higher in-cylinder pressures. This gives rise to higher indicated thermal efficiencies and lower fuel consumption rates compared to the same blend (D25) in DI (up to 4% and 3.2%, respectively). More significantly, the lower fuel consumption rate with dual-injection (on a volumetric basis), is up to 1.2% lower than with gasoline in homogenous DI (GDI) up to 8. bar IMEP, despite the use of a lower energy density biofuel. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

KW - 2,5-Dimethylfuran

KW - Biofuel

KW - Cross-over theory

KW - DMF

KW - Dual-injection

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.073

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.073

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781498703093

T3 - Applied Energy

SP - 59

EP - 68

BT - Applied Energy

PB - Elsevier

ER -