Collating and validating indigenous and local knowledge to apply multiple knowledge systems to an environmental challenge: A case-study of pollinators in India

Barbara M. Smith, Priyadarshini Chakrabarti Basu, Arnob Chatterjee, Soumik Chatterjee, Uday Kumar Dey, Lynn V. Dicks, Bhagirath Giri, Supratim Laha, Rabindra Kumar Majhi, Parthiba Basu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is an important role for indigenous and local knowledge in a Multiple Evidence Base to make decisions about the use of biodiversity and its management. This is important both to ensure that the knowledge base is complete (comprising both scientific and local knowledge) and to facilitate participation in the decision making process. We present a novel method to gather evidence in which we used a peer-to-peer validation process among farmers that we suggest is analogous to scientific peer review. We used a case-study approach to trial the process focussing on pollinator decline in India. Pollinator decline is a critical challenge for which there is a growing evidence base, however, this is not the case world–wide. In the state of Orissa, India, there are no validated scientific studies that record historical pollinator abundance, therefore local knowledge can contribute substantially and may indeed be the principle component of the available knowledge base. Our aim was to collate and validate local knowledge in preparation for integration with scientific knowledge from other regions, for the purpose of producing a Multiple Evidence Base to develop conservation strategies for pollinators. Farmers reported that vegetable crop yields were declining in many areas of Orissa and that the abundance of important insect crop pollinators has declined sharply across the study area in the last 10–25 years, particularly Apis cerana, Amegilla sp. and Xylocopa sp. Key pollinators for commonly grown crops were identified; both Apris cerana and Xylocopa sp. were ranked highly as pollinators by farmer participants. Crop yield declines were attributed to soil quality, water management, pests, climate change, overuse of chemical inputs and lack of agronomic expertise. Pollinator declines were attributed to the quantity and number of pesticides used. Farmers suggested that fewer pesticides, more natural habitat and the introduction of hives would support pollinator populations. This process of knowledge creation was supported by participants, which led to this paper being co-authored by both scientists and farmers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-28
Number of pages9
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume211
Issue numberA
Early online date11 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

indigenous knowledge
traditional knowledge
pollinating insects
pollinator
case studies
India
farmers
peers
Xylocopa
crop yield
Amegilla
pesticides
pesticide
vegetable yield
Apis cerana
crop
historical record
vegetable crops
crops
soil quality

Keywords

  • India
  • Indigenous knowledge
  • Local knowledge
  • Peer review
  • Pollinators
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Collating and validating indigenous and local knowledge to apply multiple knowledge systems to an environmental challenge : A case-study of pollinators in India. / Smith, Barbara M.; Basu, Priyadarshini Chakrabarti; Chatterjee, Arnob; Chatterjee, Soumik; Dey, Uday Kumar; Dicks, Lynn V.; Giri, Bhagirath; Laha, Supratim; Majhi, Rabindra Kumar; Basu, Parthiba.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 211, No. A, 01.07.2017, p. 20-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Barbara M. ; Basu, Priyadarshini Chakrabarti ; Chatterjee, Arnob ; Chatterjee, Soumik ; Dey, Uday Kumar ; Dicks, Lynn V. ; Giri, Bhagirath ; Laha, Supratim ; Majhi, Rabindra Kumar ; Basu, Parthiba. / Collating and validating indigenous and local knowledge to apply multiple knowledge systems to an environmental challenge : A case-study of pollinators in India. In: Biological Conservation. 2017 ; Vol. 211, No. A. pp. 20-28.
@article{f492d17e529a4a11b41f4e117336f9a2,
title = "Collating and validating indigenous and local knowledge to apply multiple knowledge systems to an environmental challenge: A case-study of pollinators in India",
abstract = "There is an important role for indigenous and local knowledge in a Multiple Evidence Base to make decisions about the use of biodiversity and its management. This is important both to ensure that the knowledge base is complete (comprising both scientific and local knowledge) and to facilitate participation in the decision making process. We present a novel method to gather evidence in which we used a peer-to-peer validation process among farmers that we suggest is analogous to scientific peer review. We used a case-study approach to trial the process focussing on pollinator decline in India. Pollinator decline is a critical challenge for which there is a growing evidence base, however, this is not the case world–wide. In the state of Orissa, India, there are no validated scientific studies that record historical pollinator abundance, therefore local knowledge can contribute substantially and may indeed be the principle component of the available knowledge base. Our aim was to collate and validate local knowledge in preparation for integration with scientific knowledge from other regions, for the purpose of producing a Multiple Evidence Base to develop conservation strategies for pollinators. Farmers reported that vegetable crop yields were declining in many areas of Orissa and that the abundance of important insect crop pollinators has declined sharply across the study area in the last 10–25 years, particularly Apis cerana, Amegilla sp. and Xylocopa sp. Key pollinators for commonly grown crops were identified; both Apris cerana and Xylocopa sp. were ranked highly as pollinators by farmer participants. Crop yield declines were attributed to soil quality, water management, pests, climate change, overuse of chemical inputs and lack of agronomic expertise. Pollinator declines were attributed to the quantity and number of pesticides used. Farmers suggested that fewer pesticides, more natural habitat and the introduction of hives would support pollinator populations. This process of knowledge creation was supported by participants, which led to this paper being co-authored by both scientists and farmers.",
keywords = "India, Indigenous knowledge, Local knowledge, Peer review, Pollinators, Validation",
author = "Smith, {Barbara M.} and Basu, {Priyadarshini Chakrabarti} and Arnob Chatterjee and Soumik Chatterjee and Dey, {Uday Kumar} and Dicks, {Lynn V.} and Bhagirath Giri and Supratim Laha and Majhi, {Rabindra Kumar} and Parthiba Basu",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.032",
language = "English",
volume = "211",
pages = "20--28",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "A",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collating and validating indigenous and local knowledge to apply multiple knowledge systems to an environmental challenge

T2 - A case-study of pollinators in India

AU - Smith, Barbara M.

AU - Basu, Priyadarshini Chakrabarti

AU - Chatterjee, Arnob

AU - Chatterjee, Soumik

AU - Dey, Uday Kumar

AU - Dicks, Lynn V.

AU - Giri, Bhagirath

AU - Laha, Supratim

AU - Majhi, Rabindra Kumar

AU - Basu, Parthiba

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - There is an important role for indigenous and local knowledge in a Multiple Evidence Base to make decisions about the use of biodiversity and its management. This is important both to ensure that the knowledge base is complete (comprising both scientific and local knowledge) and to facilitate participation in the decision making process. We present a novel method to gather evidence in which we used a peer-to-peer validation process among farmers that we suggest is analogous to scientific peer review. We used a case-study approach to trial the process focussing on pollinator decline in India. Pollinator decline is a critical challenge for which there is a growing evidence base, however, this is not the case world–wide. In the state of Orissa, India, there are no validated scientific studies that record historical pollinator abundance, therefore local knowledge can contribute substantially and may indeed be the principle component of the available knowledge base. Our aim was to collate and validate local knowledge in preparation for integration with scientific knowledge from other regions, for the purpose of producing a Multiple Evidence Base to develop conservation strategies for pollinators. Farmers reported that vegetable crop yields were declining in many areas of Orissa and that the abundance of important insect crop pollinators has declined sharply across the study area in the last 10–25 years, particularly Apis cerana, Amegilla sp. and Xylocopa sp. Key pollinators for commonly grown crops were identified; both Apris cerana and Xylocopa sp. were ranked highly as pollinators by farmer participants. Crop yield declines were attributed to soil quality, water management, pests, climate change, overuse of chemical inputs and lack of agronomic expertise. Pollinator declines were attributed to the quantity and number of pesticides used. Farmers suggested that fewer pesticides, more natural habitat and the introduction of hives would support pollinator populations. This process of knowledge creation was supported by participants, which led to this paper being co-authored by both scientists and farmers.

AB - There is an important role for indigenous and local knowledge in a Multiple Evidence Base to make decisions about the use of biodiversity and its management. This is important both to ensure that the knowledge base is complete (comprising both scientific and local knowledge) and to facilitate participation in the decision making process. We present a novel method to gather evidence in which we used a peer-to-peer validation process among farmers that we suggest is analogous to scientific peer review. We used a case-study approach to trial the process focussing on pollinator decline in India. Pollinator decline is a critical challenge for which there is a growing evidence base, however, this is not the case world–wide. In the state of Orissa, India, there are no validated scientific studies that record historical pollinator abundance, therefore local knowledge can contribute substantially and may indeed be the principle component of the available knowledge base. Our aim was to collate and validate local knowledge in preparation for integration with scientific knowledge from other regions, for the purpose of producing a Multiple Evidence Base to develop conservation strategies for pollinators. Farmers reported that vegetable crop yields were declining in many areas of Orissa and that the abundance of important insect crop pollinators has declined sharply across the study area in the last 10–25 years, particularly Apis cerana, Amegilla sp. and Xylocopa sp. Key pollinators for commonly grown crops were identified; both Apris cerana and Xylocopa sp. were ranked highly as pollinators by farmer participants. Crop yield declines were attributed to soil quality, water management, pests, climate change, overuse of chemical inputs and lack of agronomic expertise. Pollinator declines were attributed to the quantity and number of pesticides used. Farmers suggested that fewer pesticides, more natural habitat and the introduction of hives would support pollinator populations. This process of knowledge creation was supported by participants, which led to this paper being co-authored by both scientists and farmers.

KW - India

KW - Indigenous knowledge

KW - Local knowledge

KW - Peer review

KW - Pollinators

KW - Validation

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.032

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.032

M3 - Article

VL - 211

SP - 20

EP - 28

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - A

ER -