Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty: Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments

Katharina Gangl, Daniela Pfabigan, Claus Lamm, Erich Kirchler, Eva Hofmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cooperation in social systems such as tax honesty is of central importance in our modern societies. However, we know little about cognitive and neural processes driving decisions to evade or pay taxes. This study focuses on the impact of perceived tax authority and examines the mental chronometry mirrored in ERP data allowing a deeper understanding about why humans cooperate in tax systems. We experimentally manipulated coercive and legitimate authority and studied its impact on cooperation and underlying cognitive (experiment 1, 2) and neuronal (experiment 2) processes. Experiment 1 showed that in a condition of coercive authority, tax payments are lower, decisions are faster and participants report more rational reasoning and enforced compliance, however, less voluntary cooperation than in a condition of legitimate authority. Experiment 2 confirmed most results, but did not find a difference in payments or self-reported rational reasoning. Moreover, legitimate authority led to heightened cognitive control (expressed by increased MFN amplitudes) and disrupted attention processing (expressed by decreased P300 amplitudes) compared to coercive authority. To conclude, the neuronal data surprisingly revealed that legitimate authority may led to higher decision conflict and thus to higher cognitive demands in tax decisions than coercive authority.

Publisher Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1108-1117
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Volume12
Issue number7
Early online date11 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Taxes
Licensure
Compliance
Reproduction

Keywords

  • taxpaying
  • cognitive control
  • social decision-making
  • MFN
  • P300
  • P2

Cite this

Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty : Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments. / Gangl, Katharina; Pfabigan, Daniela; Lamm, Claus; Kirchler, Erich; Hofmann, Eva.

In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Vol. 12, No. 7, 07.2017, p. 1108-1117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gangl, Katharina ; Pfabigan, Daniela ; Lamm, Claus ; Kirchler, Erich ; Hofmann, Eva. / Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty : Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments. In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2017 ; Vol. 12, No. 7. pp. 1108-1117.
@article{5fc93065dc18491c9762f0fe75fc72ea,
title = "Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty: Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments",
abstract = "Cooperation in social systems such as tax honesty is of central importance in our modern societies. However, we know little about cognitive and neural processes driving decisions to evade or pay taxes. This study focuses on the impact of perceived tax authority and examines the mental chronometry mirrored in ERP data allowing a deeper understanding about why humans cooperate in tax systems. We experimentally manipulated coercive and legitimate authority and studied its impact on cooperation and underlying cognitive (experiment 1, 2) and neuronal (experiment 2) processes. Experiment 1 showed that in a condition of coercive authority, tax payments are lower, decisions are faster and participants report more rational reasoning and enforced compliance, however, less voluntary cooperation than in a condition of legitimate authority. Experiment 2 confirmed most results, but did not find a difference in payments or self-reported rational reasoning. Moreover, legitimate authority led to heightened cognitive control (expressed by increased MFN amplitudes) and disrupted attention processing (expressed by decreased P300 amplitudes) compared to coercive authority. To conclude, the neuronal data surprisingly revealed that legitimate authority may led to higher decision conflict and thus to higher cognitive demands in tax decisions than coercive authority.Publisher Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited",
keywords = "taxpaying, cognitive control, social decision-making, MFN, P300, P2",
author = "Katharina Gangl and Daniela Pfabigan and Claus Lamm and Erich Kirchler and Eva Hofmann",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1093/scan/nsx029",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1108--1117",
journal = "Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience",
issn = "1749-5024",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty

T2 - Evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments

AU - Gangl, Katharina

AU - Pfabigan, Daniela

AU - Lamm, Claus

AU - Kirchler, Erich

AU - Hofmann, Eva

PY - 2017/7

Y1 - 2017/7

N2 - Cooperation in social systems such as tax honesty is of central importance in our modern societies. However, we know little about cognitive and neural processes driving decisions to evade or pay taxes. This study focuses on the impact of perceived tax authority and examines the mental chronometry mirrored in ERP data allowing a deeper understanding about why humans cooperate in tax systems. We experimentally manipulated coercive and legitimate authority and studied its impact on cooperation and underlying cognitive (experiment 1, 2) and neuronal (experiment 2) processes. Experiment 1 showed that in a condition of coercive authority, tax payments are lower, decisions are faster and participants report more rational reasoning and enforced compliance, however, less voluntary cooperation than in a condition of legitimate authority. Experiment 2 confirmed most results, but did not find a difference in payments or self-reported rational reasoning. Moreover, legitimate authority led to heightened cognitive control (expressed by increased MFN amplitudes) and disrupted attention processing (expressed by decreased P300 amplitudes) compared to coercive authority. To conclude, the neuronal data surprisingly revealed that legitimate authority may led to higher decision conflict and thus to higher cognitive demands in tax decisions than coercive authority.Publisher Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

AB - Cooperation in social systems such as tax honesty is of central importance in our modern societies. However, we know little about cognitive and neural processes driving decisions to evade or pay taxes. This study focuses on the impact of perceived tax authority and examines the mental chronometry mirrored in ERP data allowing a deeper understanding about why humans cooperate in tax systems. We experimentally manipulated coercive and legitimate authority and studied its impact on cooperation and underlying cognitive (experiment 1, 2) and neuronal (experiment 2) processes. Experiment 1 showed that in a condition of coercive authority, tax payments are lower, decisions are faster and participants report more rational reasoning and enforced compliance, however, less voluntary cooperation than in a condition of legitimate authority. Experiment 2 confirmed most results, but did not find a difference in payments or self-reported rational reasoning. Moreover, legitimate authority led to heightened cognitive control (expressed by increased MFN amplitudes) and disrupted attention processing (expressed by decreased P300 amplitudes) compared to coercive authority. To conclude, the neuronal data surprisingly revealed that legitimate authority may led to higher decision conflict and thus to higher cognitive demands in tax decisions than coercive authority.Publisher Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

KW - taxpaying

KW - cognitive control

KW - social decision-making

KW - MFN

KW - P300

KW - P2

U2 - 10.1093/scan/nsx029

DO - 10.1093/scan/nsx029

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1108

EP - 1117

JO - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

JF - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

SN - 1749-5024

IS - 7

ER -