Codes of Ethics Content: UK and Australian Corporations

G. Wood, Georgina Whyatt, Michael Callaghan, Goran Svensson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose
This study aims to compare the content of the codes of ethics of the top 50 corporations in the UK and Australia.

Design/methodology/approach
The code of each of the 50 top companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and the 50 top companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange based on market capitalization was read against an updated version of a previous code content classification system.

Findings
This research provides valuable insights into the similarities and differences that exist between the expected ethical standards in corporations based in two historically linked and culturally related countries: corporate approaches that are worthy of comment.

Research limitations/implications
This paper does provide a sound basis for further investigation and cross-country comparisons of corporate codes of ethics.

Practical implications
The instrument used for classifying code content gives an insight into the top companies operating in the UK and Australia and what they consider important to cover within a code of ethics.

Social implications
In light of increasing societal expectations of corporate ethical standards, this research study offers improved understanding of/insight into the development of codes of ethics as a means to guide organizational behaviours/conduct.

Originality/value
This study proposes a contemporary instrument for the analysis of codes of ethics that has built upon the work of others over the past 30 years.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-687
Number of pages19
JournalEuropean Business Review
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Code of ethics
Ethical standards
Listed companies
London Stock Exchange
Design methodology
Organizational behaviour
Australian Stock Exchange
Classification system
Cross-country comparison
Market capitalization

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Content analysis
  • Corporate codes of ethics
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • United Kingdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Codes of Ethics Content: UK and Australian Corporations. / Wood, G.; Whyatt, Georgina; Callaghan, Michael; Svensson, Goran.

In: European Business Review, Vol. 31, No. 5, 02.08.2019, p. 669-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wood, G. ; Whyatt, Georgina ; Callaghan, Michael ; Svensson, Goran. / Codes of Ethics Content: UK and Australian Corporations. In: European Business Review. 2019 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 669-687.
@article{2051b9a95f8d415797a7bca53a1896b7,
title = "Codes of Ethics Content: UK and Australian Corporations",
abstract = "PurposeThis study aims to compare the content of the codes of ethics of the top 50 corporations in the UK and Australia.Design/methodology/approachThe code of each of the 50 top companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and the 50 top companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange based on market capitalization was read against an updated version of a previous code content classification system.FindingsThis research provides valuable insights into the similarities and differences that exist between the expected ethical standards in corporations based in two historically linked and culturally related countries: corporate approaches that are worthy of comment.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper does provide a sound basis for further investigation and cross-country comparisons of corporate codes of ethics.Practical implicationsThe instrument used for classifying code content gives an insight into the top companies operating in the UK and Australia and what they consider important to cover within a code of ethics.Social implicationsIn light of increasing societal expectations of corporate ethical standards, this research study offers improved understanding of/insight into the development of codes of ethics as a means to guide organizational behaviours/conduct.Originality/valueThis study proposes a contemporary instrument for the analysis of codes of ethics that has built upon the work of others over the past 30 years.",
keywords = "Australia, Content analysis, Corporate codes of ethics, Corporate social responsibility, United Kingdom",
author = "G. Wood and Georgina Whyatt and Michael Callaghan and Goran Svensson",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1108/EBR-04-2018-0081",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "669--687",
journal = "European Business Review",
issn = "0955-534X",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Codes of Ethics Content: UK and Australian Corporations

AU - Wood, G.

AU - Whyatt, Georgina

AU - Callaghan, Michael

AU - Svensson, Goran

PY - 2019/8/2

Y1 - 2019/8/2

N2 - PurposeThis study aims to compare the content of the codes of ethics of the top 50 corporations in the UK and Australia.Design/methodology/approachThe code of each of the 50 top companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and the 50 top companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange based on market capitalization was read against an updated version of a previous code content classification system.FindingsThis research provides valuable insights into the similarities and differences that exist between the expected ethical standards in corporations based in two historically linked and culturally related countries: corporate approaches that are worthy of comment.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper does provide a sound basis for further investigation and cross-country comparisons of corporate codes of ethics.Practical implicationsThe instrument used for classifying code content gives an insight into the top companies operating in the UK and Australia and what they consider important to cover within a code of ethics.Social implicationsIn light of increasing societal expectations of corporate ethical standards, this research study offers improved understanding of/insight into the development of codes of ethics as a means to guide organizational behaviours/conduct.Originality/valueThis study proposes a contemporary instrument for the analysis of codes of ethics that has built upon the work of others over the past 30 years.

AB - PurposeThis study aims to compare the content of the codes of ethics of the top 50 corporations in the UK and Australia.Design/methodology/approachThe code of each of the 50 top companies listed on the London Stock Exchange and the 50 top companies listed on the Australian Stock Exchange based on market capitalization was read against an updated version of a previous code content classification system.FindingsThis research provides valuable insights into the similarities and differences that exist between the expected ethical standards in corporations based in two historically linked and culturally related countries: corporate approaches that are worthy of comment.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper does provide a sound basis for further investigation and cross-country comparisons of corporate codes of ethics.Practical implicationsThe instrument used for classifying code content gives an insight into the top companies operating in the UK and Australia and what they consider important to cover within a code of ethics.Social implicationsIn light of increasing societal expectations of corporate ethical standards, this research study offers improved understanding of/insight into the development of codes of ethics as a means to guide organizational behaviours/conduct.Originality/valueThis study proposes a contemporary instrument for the analysis of codes of ethics that has built upon the work of others over the past 30 years.

KW - Australia

KW - Content analysis

KW - Corporate codes of ethics

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073069086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/EBR-04-2018-0081

DO - 10.1108/EBR-04-2018-0081

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 669

EP - 687

JO - European Business Review

JF - European Business Review

SN - 0955-534X

IS - 5

ER -