Celebrations amongst challenges: Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the British Psychology Society

Sarah Riley, Joanna Brooks, Simon Goodman, Sharon Cahill, Peter Branney, Gareth J. Treharne, Cath Sullivan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article summarises the standpoint of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society regarding the current position of qualitative research in psychology in the United Kingdom. The article is in three
parts. Part one documents the historical development of the section, outlining its rationale, remit, and current activities. These activities aim to champion and develop qualitative methods in psychology, supporting high quality work
regardless of epistemological or ontological position. Part two considers the current context of our work, describing not only how qualitative methods are valued in the United Kingdom but also how this recognition is undermined, particularly through the operationalisation of our national research assessment (the Research Excellence Framework). We also consider the challenges that Open Science poses for qualitive researchers. Part three highlights some of the significant contributions of UK-based qualitative researchers to psychology, with a particular focus on feminist-informed research, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis, before pointing to future exciting possibilities based on research exploring the affordances of digital
technologies and innovative synthesising across epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries.
LanguageEnglish
Pages464-482
Number of pages19
JournalQualitative Research in Psychology
Volume16
Issue number3
Early online date22 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Psychology
Research
Research Personnel
Qualitative Research
United Kingdom

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • British Psychological Society
  • Open Science
  • QMiP
  • qualitative methods
  • Research Excellence Framework
  • United Kingdom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Celebrations amongst challenges : Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the British Psychology Society. / Riley, Sarah; Brooks, Joanna; Goodman, Simon; Cahill, Sharon; Branney, Peter; Treharne, Gareth J.; Sullivan, Cath .

In: Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2019, p. 464-482.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Riley, Sarah ; Brooks, Joanna ; Goodman, Simon ; Cahill, Sharon ; Branney, Peter ; Treharne, Gareth J. ; Sullivan, Cath . / Celebrations amongst challenges : Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the British Psychology Society. In: Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 464-482.
@article{b5dbd29223d44b1eaf5f074772388ccf,
title = "Celebrations amongst challenges: Considering the past, present and future of the qualitative methods in psychology section of the British Psychology Society",
abstract = "This article summarises the standpoint of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society regarding the current position of qualitative research in psychology in the United Kingdom. The article is in threeparts. Part one documents the historical development of the section, outlining its rationale, remit, and current activities. These activities aim to champion and develop qualitative methods in psychology, supporting high quality workregardless of epistemological or ontological position. Part two considers the current context of our work, describing not only how qualitative methods are valued in the United Kingdom but also how this recognition is undermined, particularly through the operationalisation of our national research assessment (the Research Excellence Framework). We also consider the challenges that Open Science poses for qualitive researchers. Part three highlights some of the significant contributions of UK-based qualitative researchers to psychology, with a particular focus on feminist-informed research, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis, before pointing to future exciting possibilities based on research exploring the affordances of digitaltechnologies and innovative synthesising across epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries.",
keywords = "British Psychological Society, Open Science, QMiP, qualitative methods, Research Excellence Framework, United Kingdom",
author = "Sarah Riley and Joanna Brooks and Simon Goodman and Sharon Cahill and Peter Branney and Treharne, {Gareth J.} and Cath Sullivan",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275 Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "464--482",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Psychology",
issn = "1478-0887",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Celebrations amongst challenges

T2 - Qualitative Research in Psychology

AU - Riley, Sarah

AU - Brooks, Joanna

AU - Goodman, Simon

AU - Cahill, Sharon

AU - Branney, Peter

AU - Treharne, Gareth J.

AU - Sullivan, Cath

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Qualitative Research in Psychology on 22/05/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This article summarises the standpoint of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society regarding the current position of qualitative research in psychology in the United Kingdom. The article is in threeparts. Part one documents the historical development of the section, outlining its rationale, remit, and current activities. These activities aim to champion and develop qualitative methods in psychology, supporting high quality workregardless of epistemological or ontological position. Part two considers the current context of our work, describing not only how qualitative methods are valued in the United Kingdom but also how this recognition is undermined, particularly through the operationalisation of our national research assessment (the Research Excellence Framework). We also consider the challenges that Open Science poses for qualitive researchers. Part three highlights some of the significant contributions of UK-based qualitative researchers to psychology, with a particular focus on feminist-informed research, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis, before pointing to future exciting possibilities based on research exploring the affordances of digitaltechnologies and innovative synthesising across epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries.

AB - This article summarises the standpoint of the Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section of the British Psychological Society regarding the current position of qualitative research in psychology in the United Kingdom. The article is in threeparts. Part one documents the historical development of the section, outlining its rationale, remit, and current activities. These activities aim to champion and develop qualitative methods in psychology, supporting high quality workregardless of epistemological or ontological position. Part two considers the current context of our work, describing not only how qualitative methods are valued in the United Kingdom but also how this recognition is undermined, particularly through the operationalisation of our national research assessment (the Research Excellence Framework). We also consider the challenges that Open Science poses for qualitive researchers. Part three highlights some of the significant contributions of UK-based qualitative researchers to psychology, with a particular focus on feminist-informed research, discourse analysis, and interpretative phenomenological analysis, before pointing to future exciting possibilities based on research exploring the affordances of digitaltechnologies and innovative synthesising across epistemologies and disciplinary boundaries.

KW - British Psychological Society

KW - Open Science

KW - QMiP

KW - qualitative methods

KW - Research Excellence Framework

KW - United Kingdom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066408159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275

DO - 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605275

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 464

EP - 482

JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology

JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology

SN - 1478-0887

IS - 3

ER -