Case study: A safety and usability evaluation of two different carphone designs

Andrew M. Parkes; Nicholas Ward

doi:10.1504/IJVD.2001.001927

Case study: A safety and usability evaluation of two different carphone designs

Andrew M. Parkes, Nicholas Ward

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a case study of a comprehensive evaluation methodology to compare to types of carphone design. In this study a traditional phone interface was compared to a 'satellite' interface design which moved the controls to the hand position near the wheel and moved the visual display higher on the dashboard in line with the driver forward sight line. Evaluation measures were based on subjective and objective data related to ease of learning, usability and safety. The evaluation indicated that whereas there was no unanimous advantage for the new system across all measures, the design of the 'satellite' system was preferred to the traditional design and had a greater safety benefit in terms of a reduction of total 'eyes-off-road' time. The results of the evaluation are discussed in terms of the applied methodology.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	12-29
Number of pages	18
Journal	International Journal of Vehicle Design
Volume	26
Issue number	1 SPEC. ISS
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVD.2001.001927
Publication status	Published - 26 Jun 2001
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Carphones
Driver behaviour
Evaluation methods
User-centred design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Mechanical Engineering
Automotive Engineering

Access to Document

10.1504/IJVD.2001.001927

Cite this

@article{e25f95de47dd46569f175c83bfec0458,

title = "Case study: A safety and usability evaluation of two different carphone designs",

abstract = "This paper presents a case study of a comprehensive evaluation methodology to compare to types of carphone design. In this study a traditional phone interface was compared to a 'satellite' interface design which moved the controls to the hand position near the wheel and moved the visual display higher on the dashboard in line with the driver forward sight line. Evaluation measures were based on subjective and objective data related to ease of learning, usability and safety. The evaluation indicated that whereas there was no unanimous advantage for the new system across all measures, the design of the 'satellite' system was preferred to the traditional design and had a greater safety benefit in terms of a reduction of total 'eyes-off-road' time. The results of the evaluation are discussed in terms of the applied methodology.",

keywords = "Carphones, Driver behaviour, Evaluation methods, User-centred design",

author = "Parkes, {Andrew M.} and Nicholas Ward",

year = "2001",

month = jun,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1504/IJVD.2001.001927",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "12--29",

journal = "International Journal of Vehicle Design",

issn = "0143-3369",

publisher = "Inderscience",

number = "1 SPEC. ISS",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case study

T2 - A safety and usability evaluation of two different carphone designs

AU - Parkes, Andrew M.

AU - Ward, Nicholas

PY - 2001/6/26

Y1 - 2001/6/26

N2 - This paper presents a case study of a comprehensive evaluation methodology to compare to types of carphone design. In this study a traditional phone interface was compared to a 'satellite' interface design which moved the controls to the hand position near the wheel and moved the visual display higher on the dashboard in line with the driver forward sight line. Evaluation measures were based on subjective and objective data related to ease of learning, usability and safety. The evaluation indicated that whereas there was no unanimous advantage for the new system across all measures, the design of the 'satellite' system was preferred to the traditional design and had a greater safety benefit in terms of a reduction of total 'eyes-off-road' time. The results of the evaluation are discussed in terms of the applied methodology.

AB - This paper presents a case study of a comprehensive evaluation methodology to compare to types of carphone design. In this study a traditional phone interface was compared to a 'satellite' interface design which moved the controls to the hand position near the wheel and moved the visual display higher on the dashboard in line with the driver forward sight line. Evaluation measures were based on subjective and objective data related to ease of learning, usability and safety. The evaluation indicated that whereas there was no unanimous advantage for the new system across all measures, the design of the 'satellite' system was preferred to the traditional design and had a greater safety benefit in terms of a reduction of total 'eyes-off-road' time. The results of the evaluation are discussed in terms of the applied methodology.

KW - Carphones

KW - Driver behaviour

KW - Evaluation methods

KW - User-centred design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034970090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJVD.2001.001927

DO - 10.1504/IJVD.2001.001927

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034970090

VL - 26

SP - 12

EP - 29

JO - International Journal of Vehicle Design

JF - International Journal of Vehicle Design

SN - 0143-3369

IS - 1 SPEC. ISS

ER -

Case study: A safety and usability evaluation of two different carphone designs

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this