Case Comment - Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Comments on the Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes on whether a law firm's forced retirement of a partner at the age of 65, amounting to direct age discrimination under Directive 2000/78, was justified by a legitimate aim.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-27
Number of pages6
JournalCoventry Law Journal
Volume13
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • employment
  • equality
  • discrimination
  • Age Factors
  • European Union Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Case Comment - Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this