TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiovascular autonomic control in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and pharmacologic therapy
AU - Nunan, D
AU - Sandercock, GR
AU - George, RS
AU - Jakovljevic, DG
AU - Donovan, G
AU - Bougard, R
AU - Yacoub, MH
AU - Brodie, DA
AU - Birks, EJ
PY - 2013/10
Y1 - 2013/10
N2 - Objectives
The objective of the study is to determine cardiac autonomic control in patients undergoing assessment for and/or LVAD therapy.
Methods
Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured in 17 explanted LVAD, 17 implanted LVAD and 23 NYHA III–IV classified chronic heart failure (CHF) patients and ten healthy matched controls under three conditions: supine free breathing, standing and supine controlled breathing. Five measures of HRV were assessed: mean R–R interval (mR–R), high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) spectral power, LF in normalised units (LFnu), and LF to HF (LF:HF) ratio.
Results
Repeat measures ANOVA showed significant (p < 0.05) differences in HRV between all three conditions within groups. Lower values were observed in CHF for LF(in log natural units) compared with explanted patients (− 1.4 [95% CI − 2.6 to − 0.7], p = 0.04) and controls (− 2.1 [− 3.5 to − 0.7], p = 0.001) and for LF:HF compared with implanted patients under paced breathing conditions ( z = − 2.7, p = 0.007) and controls in standing ( z = − 2.9, p = 0.004) and paced breathing conditions ( z = − 2.3, p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were seen between explanted, implanted and control groups under any condition.
Conclusions
Patients implanted with an LVAD and explanted from a LVAD following myocardial recovery demonstrate a more normal dynamic response to autonomic stimuli and have a lower HRV risk profile compared to CHF patients.
AB - Objectives
The objective of the study is to determine cardiac autonomic control in patients undergoing assessment for and/or LVAD therapy.
Methods
Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured in 17 explanted LVAD, 17 implanted LVAD and 23 NYHA III–IV classified chronic heart failure (CHF) patients and ten healthy matched controls under three conditions: supine free breathing, standing and supine controlled breathing. Five measures of HRV were assessed: mean R–R interval (mR–R), high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) spectral power, LF in normalised units (LFnu), and LF to HF (LF:HF) ratio.
Results
Repeat measures ANOVA showed significant (p < 0.05) differences in HRV between all three conditions within groups. Lower values were observed in CHF for LF(in log natural units) compared with explanted patients (− 1.4 [95% CI − 2.6 to − 0.7], p = 0.04) and controls (− 2.1 [− 3.5 to − 0.7], p = 0.001) and for LF:HF compared with implanted patients under paced breathing conditions ( z = − 2.7, p = 0.007) and controls in standing ( z = − 2.9, p = 0.004) and paced breathing conditions ( z = − 2.3, p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were seen between explanted, implanted and control groups under any condition.
Conclusions
Patients implanted with an LVAD and explanted from a LVAD following myocardial recovery demonstrate a more normal dynamic response to autonomic stimuli and have a lower HRV risk profile compared to CHF patients.
KW - Bridge-to-recovery
KW - Reverse remodelling
KW - Heart rate variability
KW - Prognosis
UR - http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23896543
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.075
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.075
M3 - Article
C2 - 23896543
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 168
SP - 4145
EP - 4149
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -