Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry

Matt Hill, Chris Talbot, Michael Puddiford, Mike Price

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise using self-regulated and imposed power outputs distributed between the arms and legs.

METHODS: Ten males (age 21.7 ± 3.4 years) initially undertook incremental arm-crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CYC) tests to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (Wpeak). Two subsequent tests involved 20-min combined arm-leg ergometry (ALE) trials, using imposed and self-regulated protocols, both of which aimed to elicit an exercising heart rate of 160 beats min-1. During the imposed trial, arm and leg intensity were set at 40% of each ergometer-specific Wpeak. During the self-regulated trial, participants were asked to self-regulate cadence and resistance to achieve the target heart rate. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), pulmonary ventilation ([Formula: see text]), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded continuously.

RESULTS: As expected, there were no differences between imposed and self-regulated trials for HR, [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] (all P ≥ 0.05). However, central RPE and local RPE for the arms were lower during self-regulated compared imposed trials (P ≤ 0.05). Lower RPE during the self-regulated trial was related to preferential adjustments in how the arms (33 ± 5% Wpeak) and legs (46 ± 5% Wpeak) contributed to the exercise intensity.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that despite similar metabolic and cardiovascular strain elicited by imposed and self-regulated ALE, the latter was perceived to be less strenuous, which is related to participants doing more work with the legs and less work with the arms to achieve the target intensity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1011-1019
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume118
Issue number5
Early online date6 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

Fingerprint

Ergometry
Leg
Arm
Heart Rate
Pulmonary Ventilation
Oxygen

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7

Keywords

  • Combined arm–leg ergometer
  • Arm-cranking
  • Concurrent exercise
  • Whole-body exercise
  • Energy expenditure

Cite this

Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry. / Hill, Matt; Talbot, Chris; Puddiford, Michael; Price, Mike.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 118, No. 5, 05.2018, p. 1011-1019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d81034e7a2a4bf4973eda9c8bc84978,
title = "Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry",
abstract = "PURPOSE: This study compared cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise using self-regulated and imposed power outputs distributed between the arms and legs.METHODS: Ten males (age 21.7 ± 3.4 years) initially undertook incremental arm-crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CYC) tests to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (Wpeak). Two subsequent tests involved 20-min combined arm-leg ergometry (ALE) trials, using imposed and self-regulated protocols, both of which aimed to elicit an exercising heart rate of 160 beats min-1. During the imposed trial, arm and leg intensity were set at 40{\%} of each ergometer-specific Wpeak. During the self-regulated trial, participants were asked to self-regulate cadence and resistance to achieve the target heart rate. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), pulmonary ventilation ([Formula: see text]), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded continuously.RESULTS: As expected, there were no differences between imposed and self-regulated trials for HR, [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] (all P ≥ 0.05). However, central RPE and local RPE for the arms were lower during self-regulated compared imposed trials (P ≤ 0.05). Lower RPE during the self-regulated trial was related to preferential adjustments in how the arms (33 ± 5{\%} Wpeak) and legs (46 ± 5{\%} Wpeak) contributed to the exercise intensity.CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that despite similar metabolic and cardiovascular strain elicited by imposed and self-regulated ALE, the latter was perceived to be less strenuous, which is related to participants doing more work with the legs and less work with the arms to achieve the target intensity.",
keywords = "Combined arm–leg ergometer, Arm-cranking, Concurrent exercise, Whole-body exercise, Energy expenditure",
author = "Matt Hill and Chris Talbot and Michael Puddiford and Mike Price",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7",
language = "English",
volume = "118",
pages = "1011--1019",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to self-regulated and imposed submaximal arm-leg ergometry

AU - Hill, Matt

AU - Talbot, Chris

AU - Puddiford, Michael

AU - Price, Mike

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7

PY - 2018/5

Y1 - 2018/5

N2 - PURPOSE: This study compared cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise using self-regulated and imposed power outputs distributed between the arms and legs.METHODS: Ten males (age 21.7 ± 3.4 years) initially undertook incremental arm-crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CYC) tests to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (Wpeak). Two subsequent tests involved 20-min combined arm-leg ergometry (ALE) trials, using imposed and self-regulated protocols, both of which aimed to elicit an exercising heart rate of 160 beats min-1. During the imposed trial, arm and leg intensity were set at 40% of each ergometer-specific Wpeak. During the self-regulated trial, participants were asked to self-regulate cadence and resistance to achieve the target heart rate. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), pulmonary ventilation ([Formula: see text]), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded continuously.RESULTS: As expected, there were no differences between imposed and self-regulated trials for HR, [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] (all P ≥ 0.05). However, central RPE and local RPE for the arms were lower during self-regulated compared imposed trials (P ≤ 0.05). Lower RPE during the self-regulated trial was related to preferential adjustments in how the arms (33 ± 5% Wpeak) and legs (46 ± 5% Wpeak) contributed to the exercise intensity.CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that despite similar metabolic and cardiovascular strain elicited by imposed and self-regulated ALE, the latter was perceived to be less strenuous, which is related to participants doing more work with the legs and less work with the arms to achieve the target intensity.

AB - PURPOSE: This study compared cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise using self-regulated and imposed power outputs distributed between the arms and legs.METHODS: Ten males (age 21.7 ± 3.4 years) initially undertook incremental arm-crank ergometry (ACE) and cycle ergometry (CYC) tests to volitional exhaustion to determine peak power output (Wpeak). Two subsequent tests involved 20-min combined arm-leg ergometry (ALE) trials, using imposed and self-regulated protocols, both of which aimed to elicit an exercising heart rate of 160 beats min-1. During the imposed trial, arm and leg intensity were set at 40% of each ergometer-specific Wpeak. During the self-regulated trial, participants were asked to self-regulate cadence and resistance to achieve the target heart rate. Heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]), pulmonary ventilation ([Formula: see text]), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded continuously.RESULTS: As expected, there were no differences between imposed and self-regulated trials for HR, [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] (all P ≥ 0.05). However, central RPE and local RPE for the arms were lower during self-regulated compared imposed trials (P ≤ 0.05). Lower RPE during the self-regulated trial was related to preferential adjustments in how the arms (33 ± 5% Wpeak) and legs (46 ± 5% Wpeak) contributed to the exercise intensity.CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that despite similar metabolic and cardiovascular strain elicited by imposed and self-regulated ALE, the latter was perceived to be less strenuous, which is related to participants doing more work with the legs and less work with the arms to achieve the target intensity.

KW - Combined arm–leg ergometer

KW - Arm-cranking

KW - Concurrent exercise

KW - Whole-body exercise

KW - Energy expenditure

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7

DO - 10.1007/s00421-018-3838-7

M3 - Article

VL - 118

SP - 1011

EP - 1019

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 5

ER -