This paper explores the dynamics of capitalism, imperialism, and nationalism to contextualise and explain “radical” food sovereignty. It defines the opportunities and constraints surrounding the dynamics of “radical” food sovereignty as an anti-capitalist, counter-hegemonic movement. The difficulties in subverting the state-capital nexus are explored with reference to the pink tide states in Latin America, particularly Bolivia and Ecuador. Such “left” populism, through neo-extractivist funded welfarism, has subverted “radical” food sovereignty movements. Growing contradictions of neo-extractivism presage the delegitimation of the peripheral state-capital nexus, a resurgence of right authoritarian populism, and a further round of counter-hegemonic protest.
|Number of pages||18|
|Journal||Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement|
|Early online date||19 Jun 2020|
|Publication status||Published - 2 Jul 2020|
Bibliographical noteThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Canadian Journal of Development Studies on 19/06/2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02255189.2020.1767543
Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
- agrarian resistance
- food sovereignty
ASJC Scopus subject areas